Individual Grant Proposal: One Page
Methodology & Strategy
200 word maximum: Explain the method(s)/strategy used in this project, including justification for your approach. Also justify international travel, if your project requires it.
50 word maximum: Note any experience, training and/or coursework required to complete this project and explain how you have prepared.
100 words maximum: Comment on your mentee's ability to perform this project, highlighting relevant coursework, experience with methods and/or materials, and other relevant certifications and qualifications.
Unlike an Assistantship proposal, Individual Grants have two prompts for the “methodology and strategy” section. You have more space to explain but still avoid overly detailed and technical descriptions of methods. Be sure to explain how you have the training and skills needed for the project or how you will learn them. You might still have limited experience when applying for an Individual Grant, but reviewers need to see how you will gain the skills needed.
Learning Objectives
100 word maximum: Describe how this project advances your personal, academic and/or professional goals, including how it fits within your degree plan.
100 words maximum: Respond to your mentee's learning goals, commenting on 1) how you and/or an additional supervisor will support these objectives and 2) how this project will advance their academic and/or professional goals?
UROP prioritizes student learning objectives over project outcomes even in Individual Grant proposals, so you should also clearly state what you will learn beyond the results of the project.
Timeline
150 word maximum: Outline the major phases of your project, providing a timeline of activities.
Optional: Provide additional information about this project timeline.
Avoid overcrowding the timeline with details more suitable for other portions of the proposal. Be sure your timeline aligns to the grant term to which you are applying (summer or academic year). Students submitting proposals for projects continuing into the academic year might have similar proposals in their applications, but the timelines should be distinct.