CU Boulder Receives the Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement
The American Council on Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching announced on Jan. 12, 2026 that the University of Colorado Boulder has received the 2026 Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement, an honor shared by only 277 institutions nationwide.
In their acceptance notice, ACE and the Carnegie Foundation noted that CU Boulder advanced community engagement with clarity and distinction during a period of significant federal policy and funding shifts. The reviewers highlighted the university’s excellent alignment of mission, leadership, and resources in supporting dynamic partnerships that address urgent societal challenges.
The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education is the nation’s leading framework for categorizing diverse higher education institutions through Elective and Universal Classifications. Universal Classifications are organizational groupings and labels that are given to all degree-granting institutions in the United States. Institutions receive their classifications based on data they have reported to federal sources, including the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Science Foundation. CU Boulder is classified as a Doctoral University: Very High Research Activity or, colloquially, an R1.
The Carnegie Elective Classification for Community Engagement recognizes colleges and universities that have made extraordinary commitments to realizing their public purpose through reciprocal and mutually beneficial engagement with the communities they serve.
Community engagement describes collaboration between institutions of higher education and their larger communities (local, regional/state, national, global) for the mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources in a context of partnership and reciprocity. The purpose of community engagement is the partnership of college and university knowledge and resources with those of the public and private sectors to:
- enrich scholarship, research and creative activity;
- enhance curriculum, teaching and learning;
- prepare educated, engaged citizens;
- strengthen democratic values and civic responsibility;
- address critical societal issues; and contribute to the public good.
The Elective Classification is not an award, but rather evidence-based documentation of institutional policy and practices that center community engagement in areas such as institutional culture and mission, curricular and co-curricular programming, continuous improvement activities and the recruitment and reward of faculty, staff and students. As such, it requires a large body of evidence of meaningful and sustained institutional investment of systems and structures that support individuals, groups and communities to work with each other for mutual benefit and in a context of reciprocal partnership.
Institutions are successful in achieving classification to the extent that they demonstrate that community engagement is enacted and supported by the institution specifically, including—but not limited to—the activity and commitment of individual faculty, staff and students. Institutional commitment and excellence are demonstrated through systems and structures that are deep, pervasive and integrated.
- Deep engagement demonstrates systems, structures, behaviors, and outcomes that appropriately positions all partners—students, faculty, staff, community members—as co-educators, co-learners, and co-generators of knowledge; and it involves professional development that builds the capacity of all partners to undertake it in high quality, contextualized, and continuously improving ways. How has an institutional commitment to community engagement helped transition its partnerships beyond transactional exchanges to generate new, transformative possibilities among partners through reciprocal and mutually beneficial partnerships?
- Pervasiveness is demonstrated by the extent to which community engagement is part of the plans, activities, and outcomes across the academic institution, such as within academic units, student services, communications, business affairs, and other relevant areas. Is community engagement a far-reaching activity such that it is practiced, valued, and supported across many or all units and divisions with the potential to transform institution-wide cultures and systems?
- Integration is demonstrated by the extent to which community engagement is embedded into the core, strategic, and academic purposes and structures of the institution. How do commitments to the principles and practices of community engagement align with, inform, and influence institutional priorities and initiatives, such as student success, faculty and staff scholarship (broadly defined), and public and community service and how they are selected, enacted, and assessed?
For more information, please see the 2026 First Time Documentation Guide to the Application.
The Carnegie framework is the national standard by which higher education community engagement is assessed and recognized. Campuses that receive the classification are nationally recognized leaders in community engagement and exemplars of higher education’s mission of contributing to the public good. By attaining the classification, CU Boulder would join 55% of its public AAU peers.
“The classification is a unique opportunity to shine a light on our engaged scholars and how they embody CU Boulder’s mission and tradition serving Colorado and beyond.”
– CU Boulder Chancellor Justin Schwartz
The application will provide a robust and detailed picture of the many ways CU Boulder engages with regional, national and international communities, as well as opportunities to support, capture and expand outreach and engaged scholarship moving forward.
Chancellor Schwartz has charged the Office for Public and Community-Engaged Scholarship, the Research and Innovation Office and the Office for Government and Community Engagement with forming a committee to guide the application process.
CU Boulder Committee
Committee Chairs
Katie Kleinhesselink
Community Program Manager
Office for Public and Community-Engaged Scholarship
Alicia Adelman
Research Development Officer & Prestigious Nominations Manager, Research Development
Research and Innovation Office
Committee Members
Kirk Ambrose
Founding Director
Center for Teaching and Learning
Office of Government and Community Engagement
Roudy Hildreth
Executive Director
CU Engage
Ka Yong Kleiner
Director of Strategic Initiatives
Office of Faculty Affairs
Gretchen Minekime
Assistant Director of Communications
Office for Public and Community-Engaged Scholarship
Kirsten Schuchman
Associate Vice Chancellor for Public Policy
Office of Government and Community Engagement
Lisa Schwartz
Community Program Manager
Office for Public and Community-Engaged Scholarship
Erika Swain
Assistant Director for Academic Compliance and Authorization, Academic Affairs
Lane Washington
Senior Advisor to the Vice Chancellor, Interim Assistant Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs
Division of Student Affairs
Student Research Assistants
Chandler Dungan
Sophomore
Masters of the Environment
Sam Gebrewahd
Senior
Information Science
- About PACES
- Funding and Resources
Funding and Resources
Funding OpportunitiesProfessional Development & ResourcesCU Boulder Community Engagement - Initiatives and Programs
Initiatives and Programs
PACES Initiatives and Programs
"Our campus has a proud tradition, going back to its founding, of partnership with communities around Colorado and beyond.
Seeking the prestigious Carnegie elective classification will require CU Boulder to conduct a rapid and rigorous assessment of how and where community-engaged work happens across our campus. I’m eager to learn where our collective strengths lie, and how we can amplify those to benefit Colorado. Thank you in advance to all of those who will work hard on this important campuswide effort."
— CU Boulder Chancellor Justin Schwartz
