“Addiction: Agency and Attachment”

Editor: Rebecca Lemon, University of Southern California

This proposed special issue investigates the topic and phenomenon of addiction. Addiction is at the forefront of global conversations on biopolitics, with pundits debating the role of big pharmaceuticals in the rise of the opiate crisis, or the prejudicial criminalization of certain illicit drugs in contrast to the legalization of others. Even as addiction is a modern geopolitical phenomenon, it also has a long history, one that is only beginning to be mined. Accounts of addiction have productively concentrated on the modern period, linking the explosion of drugs to empire, global trade, and the formation of an addict identity, while scholars have also, recently, begun to push the study of addiction back in time, to explore the period before the 1800 watershed “discovery” of addiction. This special issue will continue this expansive study of addiction across geographical, disciplinary and historical boundaries, to consider the variety of accounts of addiction in literary and historical texts. In particular, this issue will emphasize the literary text offers a unique site for the expression of addictive desires and practices: given the challenge of tracking the phenomenon of addiction in medical or legal archives, literature offers a site for phenomenological accounts of what addiction feels like, and how it affects a community.

This special issue will investigate addiction’s range on three levels.

  • First, at the level of methodology, scholars from a wide range of disciplines pose, and answer differently, questions about addiction: literary critics, historians, theologians, sociologists, psychologists, medical scientists, legal scholars, fiction writers, and poets all grapple with the conundrum of addiction. This issue seeks to bring together such a diverse group of scholars and methods.
  • Second, addiction’s range is epistemological, evident in the variety of understandings of what constitutes addiction itself: the addict might experience a compulsive relationship to a substance or activity; or the addict might be a devotee, flourishing through attachment to God or a vocation. The addict might be a beloved, relinquishing agency in surrendering to another; or the addict might be an individual making a rational choice, only to be overcome by his or her choice of addictive object. Essays in this issue will take up these paradoxes and differences in defining addiction.
  • Third, reassessing addiction offers an opportunity to rethink agency and attachment. Addiction hinges on a model of attachment that challenges current valorizations of self-sovereignty. Considering addiction’s poles of attachment and isolation, connection and self-sovereignty, this issue will offer a reconsideration of modes of agency in modern and early modern life, inviting essays that meditate on agency more generally.

Essays of roughly 7,000-8,000 words are invited from scholars in all fields. Interested authors should feel free to contact the editor: Rebecca Lemon, Department of English, University of Southern California (rlemon@usc.edu).

Potential contributors should submit an article abstract/proposal by September 1, 2020, though it would be a good idea to contact one or both editors in advance. The completed article is expected by January 1, 2021. Time permitting, editors may share accepted contributions with co-contributors, encouraging authors to hold critical conversations. While the editor invites standard-length, single-author academic articles, she is open to other methods of critical inquiry related to the issue’s theme: position papers, clusters, roundtable discussions, book reviews, interviews, dialogues, and so on.

Essays will undergo peer review. All submissions should adhere to the Chicago-style endnote citation format. Submissions should be uploaded to ELN’s peer-review website: https://www.editorialmanager.com/eln/default.aspx.


“Trauma and Horror”

Editor: Kelly Hurley, University of Colorado at Boulder

Later nineteenth-century psychology appropriated the medical term trauma, used to denote a wound derived from the violent piercing of the skin, to describe a violent breaching of subjectivity. Thus trauma came to refer to the violation of psychic boundaries (often conjoined with a physical violation as in the case of railway and industrial accidents), the event that caused the breach, and the long-term aftereffects of the breach. The event instantiating psychic trauma is so shocking, so devastating, that the ego’s defenses are broken down, and the subject is powerless to resist the overwhelming impressions that flood its barriers or to manage the swell of affective distress that results.

The abreaction or working-through of trauma should be furthered by the most painstakingly accurate representation of its inception and effects. However, contemporary trauma theorists have described the difficulty, perhaps impossibility, of a “true” representation of traumatic events, given that the very experience of trauma involves the derangement or shattering of the subjective apparatus designed to process it. Traumatic events can only be understood belatedly and imperfectly; they give rise to repetitive dreams and uncontrollable flashbacks, and generate narratives characterized by disjunction and distortion, including the interpolation of fantasy elements. Thus the most faithful accounts of traumatic events, perversely, can only be rendered by means of narrative breaks and refusals, hyperbole and other modes of distortion, and displacement at one or more removes.

One genre that can be said to generate such perversely accurate representations of trauma is Horror. Horror specializes in hyperbolic scenarios of human subjects in the throes of excruciating physical and psychic pain, and develops these scenarios by means of phantasmatic images and hallucinatory narrative sequences. As a further complication, Horror invites its reader or spectator into a pleasurable relationship with trauma, offering up trauma as a compelling spectacle to be consumed and even enjoyed. This special issue invites essays that explore Horror’s strategies for representing personal and historical trauma, Horror’s ability (or failure, or refusal) to abreact trauma, and the paradoxical appeal of a popular genre devoted to the unpleasure of shock, violence, and psychic disorientation.

Other topics might include:

— Horror consumption as a form of traumatophilia, whereby the subject wilfully seeks out traumatic encounters that threaten to swamp or pulverize the boundaries of the psyche.

— Ecohorror and the post-apocalypse, from Mary Shelley to the Strugatsky brothers to Jeff VanderMeer.

— Horror as a genre that elicits “empathic unsettlement” (LaCapra 2001), as opposed to aversion, disgust, or other forms of denial, in its consumer.

— Critiques of Horror as an exploitative or “pornographic” genre, particularly in its representations of war, genocide, and other large-scale atrocities.

This CFP understands Horror as a capacious genre that may overlap or intersect with other fantastic genres such as Gothic, Science Fiction, Kaidan, the Weird, and so forth. It welcomes discussions of literature, film, television, graphic novels, visual arts, music, and other cultural forms, and essays that discuss national and/or regional traditions of Horror as well as individual texts. It also solicits essays that discuss the phenomenon of violent de-subjectification during earlier periods, and propose discursive antecedents (clinical, sociomedical, philosophical, religious) to the later-modern trauma paradigm.

Essays are due by September 1, 2020. They can be of varying lengths, including position papers and longer research articles. Please use Chicago-style formatting, and submit double-spaced, 12-point font, .docx files to the special issue editor, Kelly Hurley, kelly.hurley@colorado.edu. Please omit identifying information from all pages except the cover page, as we use a blind review format. Send all inquiries to Kelly Hurley.


Call for Special Issue Proposals (Open Topic)

English Language Notes

English Language Notes (ELN) is a journal devoted to special topics in all fields of literary and cultural studies. ELN is published twice a year, in April and October.  Since its founding in 1963, English Language Notes, under the sponsorship of the University of Colorado at Boulder, has provided a respected forum for criticism and scholarship in every field of English studies to a broad audience of academics and general readers. It has been unique both in its breadth of audience and subject matter and in its emphasis on shorter articles of wider interest than typical scholarly writing. The journal is particularly determined to revive and reenergize its traditional commitment to shorter notes, roundtable discussions, collaborative, interdisciplinary, and transhistorical work and all forms of scholarly innovation.

Winner of the Council of Editors of Learned Journals Phoenix Award in 2008, ELN has revamped its content to produce a unique forum for cutting-edge debate and exchange among leading figures in the field.  Beginning in Spring 2018, ELN is published by Duke Journals, in print form and online at Duke Journals website and Project Muse.

English Language Notes is accepting special issue proposals, beginning with the 60.2 (October 2022) issue.  Please include a rationale for the proposed topic, CV for each editor (if you are collaborating), and an overview of possible contributors and clusters, and send it to our Senior Editor, Nan Goodman at nan.goodman@colorado.edu.  Please also write with any questions.

Our journal is peer-reviewed and the production process at Duke UP requires that all deadlines be met. All special issues will be available through Project Muse, Duke UP Journals website, and in print.   All proposals will be reviewed and approved by the ELN editorial collective. For more information, see http://www.colorado.edu/english-language-notes/