Ness, T., Langlois, V. J., Novick, J. M., & Kim, A.E. (In Press). Theta-band neural oscillations reflect cognitive control during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
Kim, A. E., McKnight, S. M., & Miyake, A. (2024). How variable are the classic ERP effects during sentence processing? A systematic resampling analysis of the N400 and P600 effects. Cortex, 177, 130-149.
Langlois, V. J., Ness, T., Kim, A. E., & Novick, J. M. (2024). Does cognitive control modulate referential ambiguity resolution? A remote visual world study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-15.
Ness, T., Langlois, V. J., Kim, A. E., & Novick, J. M. (2023). The State of Cognitive Control in Language Processing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231197122
Ovans, Z., Hsu, N. S., Bell-Souder, D., Gilley, P., Novick, J. M., & Kim, A. E. (2022). Cognitive control states influence real-time sentence processing as reflected in the P600 ERP. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(8). 939-947.
Ovans, Z., Hsu, N. S., Bell-Souder, D., Gilley, P., Novick, J. M., & Kim, A. E. (2022). Cognitive control states influence real-time sentence processing as reflected in the P600 ERP. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 37(8), 939-947.
Kim, A. E., Oines, L., & Miyake, A. (2017). Individual Differences in Verbal Working Memory Underlie a Tradeoff Between Semantic and Structural Processing Difficulty During Language Comprehension: An ERP Investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000457
Sikos, L., Duffield, C. J., & Kim, A. E. (2016). Grammatical predictions reveal influences of semantic attraction in online sentence comprehension: evidence from speeded forced-choice sentence continuations. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-19. [PDF]
Sikos, L., & Kim, A. (submitted). Conflict between discourse-driven event representations and syntactic cues during sentence processing: An ERP study. [contact Dr. Kim for copy of manuscript]
Kim, A., Oines, L., & Sikos, L. (2015). Prediction during sentence comprehension is more than a sum of lexical associations: the role of event knowledge. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1102950 [PDF]
Hartshorne, J, Snedeker, J., Liem Azar, S. Y. M, & Kim, A.. (2015). The neural computation of scalar implicature. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30(5), 620-634. DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2014.981195 [PDF]
Narasimhan, B., Duffield, C., & Kim, A. (2015). Competing motivations in information: New and old ordering. In I. Toivonen, P. Csuri, E. Van Der Zee (Eds.), Structures in the Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kim, A. & Gilley, P (2013). Rapid effects of syntactic prediction during language understanding in visual cortex. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(45). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00045. [PDF and online access]
Kim, A. & Strakova, J. (2012). Concurrent effects of lexical status and letter-rotation during early stages of visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs. Brain Research. 1468, 52-62. [PDF]
Kim, A. & Lai, V. (2012). Rapid interactions between lexical-semantic and word-form analysis during word recognition in context: evidence from ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(5), 1104-1112. [PDF]
Thothathiri, M., Kim, A., Trueswell, J., Thompson-Schill, S. (2012). Parametric effects of syntactic-semantic conflict in Broca's area during sentence processing. Brain and Language, 120 (3), 259-264. [PDF]
Chatham, C. H., Claus, E. D., Kim, A., Curran, T., Banich M. T., & Munakata, Y. (2012). Cognitive control reflects context monitoring, not motoric stopping, in response inhibition. PLoS ONE, 7(2). [PDF]
Osterhout, L, Kim, A., & Kuperberg, G. (2012). The neurobiology of sentence comprehension. To appear in M. Spivey, M. Joanaisse, & K. McRae (Eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [PDF]
Kim, A. & Sikos, L. (2011). Conflict and surrender during sentence processing: An ERP study of syntax-semantics interaction. Brain & Language, 118, 15-22. [PDF]
Sikos, L., Brown, S. W., Michaelis, L. A., and Palmer, M., & A. Kim (2009). Figurative Language: Meaning is often more than just a sum of the parts. In Proceedings of the 2008 AAAI Symposium on Biologically-Inspired Cognitive Architectures, AAAI Technical Report FS-08-04. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. [contact Dr. Kim for copy of manuscript]
Molinaro, N., Kim, A., Vespignani,F., & Job, R. (2008). Anaphoric agreement violation: An ERP analysis of its interpretation. Cognition, 106(2), 963-74. [PDF]
Kim, A. & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205-225. [PDF]
Dell, G. & Kim, A.E. (2005). Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech. In Hartsuiker, R. J., Bastiaanse, R., Postma, A., & Wijnen, F. N. K. (Eds.), Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004) Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience 7(7), 703-704. [PDF]
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Kim, A., Greenwald, R., Inoue K. (2004). Sentences in the brain: Event-related potentials as real-time reflections of sentence comprehension and language learning. To appear in M. Carreiras & C. Clifton, Jr. (eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond. Psychology Press. [PDF]
Novick, J. Kim, A.E., & Trueswell, J. (2003). Studying the grammatical aspects of word recognition: Lexical priming, parsing and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(1), 57-75. [PDF]
Kim, A.E., Srinivas, B., & Trueswell, J.C. (2002). The convergence of lexicalist perspectives in psycholinguistics and computational linguistics. In S. Stevenson and P. Merlo (Eds.) The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing, John Benjamins. [PDF]
Trueswell, J.C. & Kim, A.E. (1998). How to prune a garden-path by nipping it in the bud: Fast-priming of verb argument structures. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 102-123. [PDF]