OTPIC Officially Retired
As of December 2, 2005, the Online Training Program on Intractable Conflict (OTPIC) has been officially retired, and is no longer open to new registrations.
The successor to OTPIC is a course called Dealing Constructively with Intractable Conflicts (DCIC). The new curriculum is built around one of our major projects, Beyond Intractability, and offers a much more extensive and informative set of learning materials than that available through OTPIC.
International Online Training Program On Intractable Conflict
Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, USA
Opening Page | Glossary | Menu Shortcut Page
Conflicts are extremely complicated processes with large numbers of actors using many different strategies to pursue many different objectives over a long period of time. The ability of people to deal constructively with these conflicts is largely determined by how well they understand the situation. If the parties do not understand who else is involved, what they're doing, and why, it is very easy for them to adopt strategies that are unlikely to succeed. Unfortunately, the communication and information gathering needed to provide needed information are expensive and time consuming. If the parties do not work efficiently they may not have the resources needed to obtain critically needed information. There is also a problem of resource commitments. Often the parties decide that they know all they need to know and that their resources should be devoted to confrontation and not further communication. While there may be times when this is a defensible position, the parties often break off potentially beneficial communication.
For example, resource limits often mean that the parties do not have the time to get to know each other in a personal and in-depth way. Inevitably choices will have to be made about what information is and is not worth pursuing and when the parties know enough to act sensibly. For this reason, efficiency is extremely important. It is easy to waste time gathering more information than needed in some areas and then not having the information needed for higher priority projects.
There is also a tendency for people to spend more time than necessary communicating with friends and supporters (who tell them what they already know) and not enough time talking to more critical people (opponents, for example) who are willing to say things that they need to know--even if they are not pleasant to hear. All too often people pursue communication strategies that only tell them what they want to hear. For example, people opposing construction of a new factory may spend all of their their time talking with friends and supporters about the factory's evils and strategies for defeating the project. They may not talk with proponents of the project to find out what the actual plans are, or to suggest possible changes that could make the plant's construction a win-win opportunity for all sides. As a result, the disputants are unlikely to ever understand one another sufficiently to explore possible compromises.
In cases where published information sources are tightly controlled by governments committed to the suppression and dissent. a variety of alternative communication strategies may be useful. In some cases this may involve the creation and use of a communication system in exile through which supporters in the international community can exchange information and develop and implement strategies for confronting injustice.
Other Scoping Problems
Copyright ©1998 Conflict Research Consortium -- Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org