God, Freedom, and Evil
PHIL 4830-001
Wes
Morriston
Department of Philosophy
Hellems 280
303-492-8297
Wes.Morriston@Colorado.EDU
Office
hours: TR 3:30-5:00 and by appt.
Description
This course will deal with several
interconnected problems and questions.
GOD
How strong are the traditional arguments for
and against the existence of God?
We'll use David Hume's classic Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
as a vehicle for our discussion of this question, but we won't limit ourselves
to arguments and information that were available to Hume.
GOD
AND MORALITY
Is God needed to provide a ÒfoundationÓ for
morality? Or is God subject to an
independent standard of morality?
What about some of the more questionable divine commands in the
Bible? Is it at all plausible to
think that a perfect being would tell anyone to do such things?
EVIL
If God exists and is as powerful and good
and wise as people say, why is there so much evil in the world? Why, for example, do bad things happen
to good people? A challenging argument
against the existence of God is
suggested by these questions.
According to this argument, an omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good
God would not allow the amount and variety of evil that actually exists.
FREEDOM
One of the most popular theistic responses
to the argument from evil is the Òfree will defense.Ó Focusing specifically on
the evil that human beings do to one another, the free will defense asserts
that God places great value on the freedom to choose between good and evil. This commonly held view raises a number
of new issues. What is free
will? Are human beings free in the
required sense? If so, to what degree
does that get God off the hook?
FREEDOM AND FOREKNOWLEDGE
If God exists and has complete and
infallible foreknowledge, can anyone be free in the sense required for a free
will defense? We'll take a close
look at the classical argument for saying that the answer is NO, and at the
various ÒmovesÓ that are available to those who disagree.
A
ÒNON-DUALÓ PERSPECTIVE
We'll take a brief look at an alternative
stance that provides a striking contrast to Western style theism. Stephen Mitchell's Zen-inspired
interpretation of the biblical book of Job, along with his personal ÒanswerÓ to
the problem of evil in the ÒZen Judaism,Ó a partly autobiographical story, will
be the subject of extended discussion. The central issue here will be whether
the right kind of ÒenlightenmentÓ undercuts the questions and problems inspired
by Western theism – putting us in a position where we can see the world, and
even love it, without judging it, viewing it from a point of view that lies
beyond the ÒdualitiesÓ of good and evil, right and wrong.
Assigned texts
David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion
Marilyn and Robert Adams, eds., The Problem
of Evil
The
Book of Job (tr.
& ed. by Raymond Scheindlin)
A number of other required readings will be
available online.
Course requirements
Regular
attendance and participation
(twenty five percent of your course grade)
Being there, making an occasional comment, asking
helpful questions, listening carefully to what others have to say and
responding appropriately are all valuable contributions to the class. This
includes the final examination period, which will be devoted to the viewing of
a movie, followed by a short discussion.
Weekly
short reaction papers (twenty
five percent)
Each Tuesday, you will hand in a short paper
reacting to some issue or argument discussed in class the previous week. Papers should take a position on the
issue you have chosen to address and should give a reason for taking that
position. Papers should be
double-spaced and no more than one
page in length.
First
paper (twenty
five percent) due in class on Thursday, October 17, 2008.
A four to six
page paper on a choice of assigned topics. Topics will be drawn from the subjects we have
discussed in the first half of the course. Papers should have a clear thesis,
give an argument for that thesis, and show an awareness of possible objections
and an ability to deal with those objections.
These are not
research papers. Additional background reading for the paper is not required.
Second
paper (twenty
five percent) due at the beginning of the final exam period.
A four to six
page paper. You
will develop your own topic in consultation with me. You should have settled on
a definite topic by the beginning of the last week of classes. Otherwise, the
instructions are the same as those for the midterm paper.
Final
exam period (Sat.,
Dec. 13, 10:30am – 1:00pm)
During the exam period, we'll view Ingmar BergmanÕs
The Seventh Seal and have a short
discussion of it. Then we'll say goodbye.
Outline of topics/readings
The concept of God
A general discussion of
the Western concept of God – ranging from ÒFirst CauseÓ to ÒPerfect
BeingÓ – and contrasting it with alternative conceptions.
God and the foundations of morality
Craig vs.
Sinnott-Armstrong, A debate on whether the existence of God is needed for
objective moral truth
(http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/craig-sinnott-armstrong.pdf:
username and password required)
Genesis, chapter 22 (the Òbinding of IsaacÓ)
Kierkegaard, ÒCan there
be a teleological suspension of the ethical?Ó (From Fear and Trembling, http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/fear-trembling.pdf:
username and password required)
C. Stephen Evans,
selections from KierkegaardÕs Ethic of
Love (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/CStephenEvans.pdf:
username and password required)
Adams, ÒAbraham's
DilemmaÓ (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/abraham.html:
username and password required)
Genocide and doctrine of biblical inerrancy
Deuteronomy 7 and 20,
25:17-19, Numbers 25 & 31, 1 Samuel 15
http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/genocide-passages.pdf
William Lane Craig,
ÒSlaughter of the CanaanitesÓ
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5767
Wes Morriston, ÒDid God Command Genocide? A Problem for the Biblical
InerrantistÓ
http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/god-genocide.pdf
What about Hell?
Marilyn McCord Adams, ÒThe Problem of Hell: A Problem of Evil for ChristiansÓ
(to be posted online)
Michael J. Murray, ÒHeaven and
HellÓ (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/Murray-hell.pdf:
username and password required)
Why do the righteous suffer?
The book of Job (Scheindlin
translation)
Eleonore Stump on Job
Stump, ÒAquinas on the Sufferings
of JobÓ (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/Stump-Aquinas.pdf:
username and password required)
Stump, ÒSecond-person Accounts of
the Problem of EvilÓ (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/Stump-whirlwind.pdf:
username and password required)
Beyond Good and Evil? A non-Western, non-dual dissolution of the problem
of evil
Mitchell, Introduction to
his translation of book of Job (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/job-stuff/job-mitchell.html:
username and password required)
Mitchell, ÒZen JudaismÓ
(from Meetings with the Archangel
– IÕll make copies available.)
Intelligent design?
Hume, Dialogues, II - VIII
An article on the
Òfine-tuningÓ argument by Robin Collins (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/lad/Collins-fine-tuning-paper-revised-for-web.pdf:
username and password required)
Why is there anything at all?
Hume, Dialogues, IX
Hume on the problem of evil
Hume, Dialogues, X – XII
More readings on the
problem of evil
Mackie, "Evil and
Omnipotence" (Adams, p. 23)
Plantinga, "God,
Evil and the Metaphysics of Freedom" (Adams, p. 83-91 only, supplemented by some notes that
IÕll give you)
Divine foreknowledge and human freedom
David Hunt (http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/wes/5600/foreknow-5600.pdf:
username and password required)
More on the problem of evil
William Rowe, "The
Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism" (Adams, p. 126)
Stephen Wykstra,
"The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments from Suffering: On Avoiding
the Evils of 'Appearance'" (Adams, p. 138)
Hick, "Soul-Making
and Suffering" (Adams, p. 168)
Diogenes Allen,
"Natural Evil and the Love of God" (Adams, p. 189)
Evil and GodÕs love for individual persons
Robert Adams, ÒMust God
Create the Best?Ó (A PDF file will be circulated.)
Marilyn Adams,
"Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God" (Adams, p. 209)