New York Times Bestseller!!
No. 21 In March, 2007  
God: The Failed Hypothesis

How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist

Prometheus Books 2007

See Jacket

God coverSomehow the notion has arisen that science has nothing to say about a supreme being that much of humanity worships as the source of all reality. Yet, in recent years theologians and theistic scientists have claimed that modern science provides evidence for the proposition that God exists. If scientific arguments for the existence of God are to be allowed into intellectual discourse, then those against his existence also have a legitimate place.
 
In the present book, I argue that by this moment in time science has advanced sufficiently to be able to make a definitive statement on the existence or nonexistence of a God having the attributes that are commonly associated with the Judaic-Christian-Islamic God. My analysis is based on the contention that this God should be readily detectable by scientific means—simply by virtue of the fact that he plays such a central role in the operation of the universe and in the lives of humans.
 
The process I will follow is the scientific method of hypothesis testing. The existence of God will be taken as a scientific hypothesis and the consequences of that hypothesis searched for in objective observations of the world around us. We will see that many of the attributes commonly associated with God have specific consequences that can be tested empirically.

This search for evidence of God will be conducted according to the same standards that are applied in the investigation of any extraordinary claim in science. After evaluating all the evidence, we conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the universe and life look exactly as they can be expected to look if there is no God.

Although most scientists do not believe in God, they are unwilling to challenge the deeply held beliefs of the majority of Americans and others worldwide. I am a physicist who refuses to equivocate. The God worshipped by the billion of followers of the monotheistic religions either exists or he does not. And his existence is a legitimate scientific issue.

If God is the intelligent designer of life on Earth, then we should find evidence for that in observations of the structure of life. We do not. If God has endowed humans with immaterial souls and is the source of morality, then we should find evidence for that in observations of human behavior. We do not. If God answers prayers, then we should see miraculous effects of prayer. We do not. If God has revealed truths to humanity, then those truths should be empirically verified. They are not. If God is the creator of the universe and the laws of nature, then we should find evidence for that in astronomy and physics. We do not. If humans are a special creation of God, then the universe should be congenial to human life. It is not.

The universe and life look exactly as they can be expected to look if there is no God.

Available at discounts from:

Prometheus Books
Amazon.com
Barnes&Noble
Wall*Mart

Slideshow. PowerPoint file of original Ketnote presentation.

Podcasts and interviews

You can listen to or read interviews of Vic Stenger at these locations:

Point of Inquiry

Faith and Freethought

Thinking-critically
This has a You-Tube video of my talk to CFI Toronto on April 5, 2007. Start at part 3. This site also has links to other relevent videos and podcasts.

The Atheist Experience

Boulder Weekly

Mindcore

Paperback Edition

The paperback edition should be available April, 2008. It will have a foreword by Christopher Hitchens and a new Postscript by the author.

Reviews

Conspicuous by His Absence by David Ludden for eSkeptic.

Tour de Force by Tom Flynn, editor of Free Inquiry.

Review by Jonathan Levinson on the Secular Web.

Forum on Physics and Society, Americal Physical Society, review by Lawrence S. Lerner

Review of both recent books in the Australian.

ScienceBlog.

Select Amazon.com reviews:

*****  Devastating critique of the God Hypothesis
, January 27, 2007
Reviewer:    Robert B. Zannelli (Ocala FL USA) - See all my reviews
  
Stenger's book is a devastating critique of the historical and current attempts to justify the existence of the traditional Judeo-Christian-Islamic God. In this book the arguments of intelligent design theories are easily demonstrated to be without merit. Stenger also invades the arena of the various rationalist arguments for the existence of God, handily disposing of these arguments with clear and penetrating logic. Next the premise that the Universe is especially congenial for life is analyzed which reveals that any God should have done a much better job making the Universe a more comfortable home for his special creatures. Finally, Stenger demonstrates the logical incompatibility of an all knowing, all powerful and all good God and the Universe we actually live in. This book is a treasure for anyone seeking a resource to refute theistic assertions and provides nourishing food for thought for undecided seekers of truth.

***** Highly recommended, March 13, 2007

Reviewer:

Andrew (Cornwall, England)

This is an outstanding book. Victor Stenger, a Professor of both Physics and Astronomy, convincingly argues against the existence of God (by which he means the Judea-Christian-Islamic version) by examining a wide variety of scientific evidence. In my view Stenger succeeds in disproving God beyond a level of reasonable doubt. Certain high profile atheists (Richard Dawkins and Same Harris, to name but two) have already written bestsellers on this subject, and I would evaluate Stenger's work as one that fully deserves the same level of success and recognition.

The structure of the book is roughly as follows: 

In the first chapter, Stenger lucidly explains the scientific method and what makes it such a potent investigative tool. This is important because many people have no real understanding of these concepts. He also refutes the widely held (at least, by religious people) view that science has nothing to say about religion. This is a very important point, which sets the foundation for the rest of the book.

Stenger also deals with another common misconception, which is that scientists are somehow opposed to, or in denial of the discovery of any supernatural forces, whether religious, psychic, or anything else which violates the natural laws as they are currently understood. In reality the only reason why most scientists do not acknowledge the evidence of such things is because the evidence does not exist.

In the remainder of the book, Stenger goes on to assess the objective evidence for and against the God hypothesis by investigating a plethora of scientific and historical research. He covers everything from biblical prophecies to the illusion of design to prayer experiments and much more. All of this research could very well have produced compelling evidence for God, but none of it has. Stenger logically concludes that the evidence looks exactly the way we would expect it to look in the absence of God.

As a mild criticism, I found that certain topics could have been covered in a bit more detail. On the other hand, some of these issues could easily form the subject of entire books, and so it would have been almost impossible to discuss them in full detail within just a single chapter. Overall I think the author has penetrated to the heart of most of the important issues, and there are plenty of references for those who which to carry out further reading. 

Chapters 4 and 5 (entitled Cosmic Evidence and The Uncongenial Universe) deserve a special mention. These two chapters are the undisputed gems of the book, in my opinion. Perhaps this is not so surprising given Stenger's expertise in physics and astronomy. For me personally, the knowledge I gained from these two chapters was easily worth the price of book by itself, and it was an absolute joy to have my eyes opened to some of the mind-boggling secrets of the universe that have been yielded by the investigative efforts of physicists and astronomers. Things do get a little hard to follow at times, but this is pretty much unavoidable for such a complex subject, and overall I think that Stenger does a great job of making it understandable to the lay reader. I won't give too much away, but rest assured that pro-god arguments like "how can something come from nothing?" (with reference to the 'big bang') and "how do you explain the fine-tuning of the universe" are comprehensively dismantled.


To conclude, I would strongly recommend this book for:

- Atheists wishing to learn about how science can be used to disprove God beyond a reasonable doubt.

- People who are vaguely religious/agnostic who wish to learn about the objective evidence for and against a supreme being.

- Religious people who:

a) wish to strengthen their faith by familiarising themselves with arguments for the opposing viewpoint, and/or

b) are brave enough to admit that they could be wrong, and wish to assess the objective evidence for and against God.

 In a nutshell, I think that Victor Stenger has done a wonderful job with this book. I have no hesitation in awarding it five stars - with six stars for chapters 4 and 5!


See other reviews at

Amazon.com
Barnes&Noble.com
Boulder Daily Camera
BC Books. This article has been syndicated for newspapers around the country.

Review file of all books by Victor J. Stenger

Declaration in Defense of Science and Naturalism

Ad in NY Times Nov. 29. 2006.


Do Our Values Come from God? The Evidence Says No

Article based on chapter in above book published in Free Inquiry 26(5)August/September 2006, pp. 42-45.

Abstract of article to appear in The Philosophers' Index.

Related Material

The Scientific Case Against a God Who Created the Universe

A chapter  in The Improbability of God, edited by Michael Martin and Ricki Monnier (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2006).

The Natural Origin of Our Universe Explained

By a Mathematical Model Based on Established Physics and Cosmology

A mathematical model of the natural origin of our universe is presented. The model is based only on the well-established theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics. The assertion that science cannot explain how our universe came about is refuted. Draft. Do not copy, quote, or distribute.

Can Science Study the Supernatural?

Slide show PowerPoint exported from KeyNote. 4.2 Mb.

See also Yonatan Fishman, "Can Science Test Supernatural Worldviews?" Science & Education ISSN 0926-7220 (Print) 1573-1901 (Online). DOI: 10.1007/s11191-007-9108-4.


E-mail comments to: vic.stenger#comcast.net (change # to @)

All comments I receive on this and other pages on this site will be assumed public and distributed to the avoid-l. e-mail discussion group unless otherwise specified. You are welcome to join. See home page for details.



Return to VJS Home Page.