Somehow
the notion has arisen that science has nothing to say about a supreme
being that much of humanity worships as the source of all reality. Yet,
in recent years theologians and theistic scientists have claimed that
modern science provides evidence for the proposition that God exists.
If scientific arguments for the existence of God are to be allowed into
intellectual discourse, then those against his existence also have a
legitimate place.***** Highly recommended, March 13, 2007
|
Reviewer: |
Andrew (Cornwall, England) |
In the first chapter, Stenger lucidly explains the scientific method and what makes it such a potent investigative tool. This is important because many people have no real understanding of these concepts. He also refutes the widely held (at least, by religious people) view that science has nothing to say about religion. This is a very important point, which sets the foundation for the rest of the book.
Stenger also deals with another common misconception, which is that scientists are somehow opposed to, or in denial of the discovery of any supernatural forces, whether religious, psychic, or anything else which violates the natural laws as they are currently understood. In reality the only reason why most scientists do not acknowledge the evidence of such things is because the evidence does not exist.
In the remainder of the book, Stenger goes on to assess the objective evidence for and against the God hypothesis by investigating a plethora of scientific and historical research. He covers everything from biblical prophecies to the illusion of design to prayer experiments and much more. All of this research could very well have produced compelling evidence for God, but none of it has. Stenger logically concludes that the evidence looks exactly the way we would expect it to look in the absence of God.As a mild criticism, I found that certain
topics could
have been covered in a bit more detail. On the other hand, some of
these issues
could easily form the subject of entire books, and so it would have
been almost
impossible to discuss them in full detail within just a single chapter.
Overall
I think the author has penetrated to the heart of most of the important
issues,
and there are plenty of references for those who which to carry out
further
reading.
Chapters
4 and 5 (entitled Cosmic Evidence and The
Uncongenial Universe) deserve a special mention. These two chapters are
the
undisputed gems of the book, in my opinion. Perhaps this is not so
surprising
given Stenger's expertise in physics and astronomy. For me personally,
the
knowledge I gained from these two chapters was easily worth the price
of book
by itself, and it was an absolute joy to have my eyes opened to some of
the
mind-boggling secrets of the universe that have been yielded by the
investigative efforts of physicists and astronomers. Things do get a
little
hard to follow at times, but this is pretty much unavoidable for such a
complex
subject, and overall I think that Stenger does a great job of making it
understandable to the lay reader. I won't give too much away, but rest
assured
that pro-god arguments like "how can something come from nothing?"
(with reference to the 'big bang') and "how do you explain the
fine-tuning
of the universe" are comprehensively dismantled.
- Atheists wishing to learn about how science can be used to disprove God beyond a reasonable doubt.
- People who are vaguely religious/agnostic who wish to learn about the objective evidence for and against a supreme being.
- Religious people who:
a) wish to strengthen their faith by familiarising themselves with arguments for the opposing viewpoint, and/or
b) are brave enough to admit that they could be wrong, and wish to assess the objective evidence for and against God.
All comments I receive on this and other pages on this site will be assumed public and distributed to the avoid-l. e-mail discussion group unless otherwise specified. You are welcome to join. See home page for details.