Reviews of Books by Victor J. Stenger


See my special page on Amazon.com whick has links to all my books and reviews.

Links to Reviews of The New Atheism

Amazon.com reviews  "Stenger successfully provides a rational response to the irrational critiques of the so-called 'new atheists'. cfeagans.
InfuriatedSciTeacher "Stenger's work is concise and well-written, with enough newly presented notions to be worthy of a read."
The Secular Outpost "Stenger makes a case that will have considerable appeal for those of us with a more optimistic temperament.
Friendly Atheist. "This is a wonderful book for any person who hasn’t read an atheist blog over the past five years. That is to say, older and brand new atheists will enjoy Stenger’s book — it’s an excellent primer for godless newbies."

Links to Reviews of Quantum Gods

Amazon.com reviews "Quantum Gods is the ONLY book-length critique of the abuse of quantum physics." Logan Narcomey.
Quantum gods don't deserve your faith. New Scientist  April 22, 2009 review by Amanda Gefter. "In this much-needed book, physicist Victor Stenger isolates and then debunks the claims of two kinds of "quantum belief."
Toronto Globe and Mail Stenger walks us through the basics of physics to refute [quantum spirituslity and theology].
Softpedia "The entire book is a joyride." Tudor Vieru, Science Editor.
Free Inquiry 29(5):60-62 (2009) Stuart Jordan. "This is an excellent book for scientists and careful thinkers."
Open Parachute. "Stenger provides an important service exposing [quantum spirituality and quantum theology] in his new book.

Links to Reviews of God: The Failed Hypothesis

Amazon.com reviews. "In my view Stenger succeeds in disproving God beyond a level of reasonable doubt." Andrew.
Conspicuous by His Absence by David Ludden for eSkeptic. "Physicist Victor Stenger has just served up a second course of delectable arguments for the non-existence of God."
Tour de Force by Tom Flynn, editor of Free Inquiry. "Stenger’s new book is a tour de force of scope, brevity, and rhetorical power."
Review by Jonathan Levinson on the Secular Web. "Dr. Stenger's learning is vast and he expresses his thoughts with enormous clarity, making them accessible to a large audience. He is a master communicator. One will not find a better book on the scientific evidence for atheism.
Forum on Physics and Society, American Physical Society, review by Lawrence S. Lerner.  "Stenger’s expertise as a physicist is clearly evident in this work."
Damien Broderick Science Fiction author. "Unlike some critics  of faith, Stenger takes the tough line that deity is not just an unnecessary hypothesis or one where an honest thinker can  choose to accept or reject it. No, it is 'the failed hypothesis'."
Jerry Peterson Simply Einstein. "Chapter by chapter, the author shows that the  existence of God would suggest certain realities in the world that would be verifiable by scientific  inquiry. But the data don’t support these would-be realities, thereby providing evidence that no God exists."

Podcasts and YouTubes

You can watch, listen to or read interviews of Vic Stenger at these locations among others:

Future of Naturalism YouTube interview by Tom Flynn, editor of Free Inquiry.
Point of Inquiry
Faith and Freethought
Thinking-critically
This has a You-Tube video of talk to CFI Toronto on April 5, 2007. Start at part 3. This site also has links to other relevent videos and podcasts.
The Atheist Experience
Huntington News Column in West Virginia web newspaper.
Mindcore

Links to Reviews of The Comprehensible Cosmos

Amazon.com reviews."This is the third book from Professor Stenger that I've read. In my mind, he's certainly the "Richard Dawkins' of general-audience physics books." Mike.
New Scientist. "Stenger has written a fascinating and throught-provoking book. . . it is a feast for both the specialist and dedicated general reader."
Damien Broderick Science Fiction author. "Why is there Something, rather than Nothing? Who put the bang in the big bang? Veteran particle physicist  Victor Stenger offers an answer to that deep question in his two new books [God: The Failed Hypothesis also reviewed], arguing a materialist, God-free account of the  cosmos, equally antagonistic to superstition, the paranormal and religions archetypal and newfangled alike."
Times Higher Education-John Gribbon "It is a rare delight for a reviewer to be asked to comment on a book that spells out an idea that he has been promoting himself. I therefore have to confess to feeling a warm appreciation for Victor Stenger's work, even before I plunged in to the text. The fact that the text does not entirely do justice to the idea is mildly disappointing, but what Stenger has to say is so important that it should at least be discussed everywhere that physics is taught."
Stephen Ames, History and Philosophy of Science Programme, The University of Melbourne "V.J. Stenger . . . provides a scientific answer to the question, 'where do the laws of physics come from?' Remarkably, his elegant and mathematically detailed derivation of the laws is driven by the requirment that the models physicists develop to describe objective reality cannot depend on the standpoint of the observer."


Links to Reviews of Has Science Found God?

"Sleeping with the Enemy" by Karl Giberson in Research News & Opportunities in Science and Theology. Note this is a publication of the Templeton Foundation.
"Has Science Found God?" by Kenneth Silber in Tech Central Station.
Skeptic Bibliography
Perspectives in Science and the Christian Faith
by Gary DeBoer


Reviews of Timeless Reality

Astronomy Magazine. January 2002. Read review by Jennifer Birriel here.
Choice. Current reviews for Academic Libraries. May 2001 This wide-ranging, sophisticated book treats physics and important philosophical issues closely related to physics. The dust cover blurb does a poor job of describing the book; the best description is found on page 339: "The Basic thesis of this book is that physics has painted for us a simple picture of material reality that is well within our general understanding." In roughly 400 pages, Stenger (Univ. of Hawaii), a professional physicist with an interest in philosophy, discusses major topics of physics such as relativity, quantum mechanics, and the apparent one-way nature of time, as well as philosophical stances from Platonism to postmodernism. The book goes considerably beyond popularization, without burdening the reader with technical detail. Nevertheless, it would take a very gifted lay reader to absorb everything in this book in one reading. The author makes his own views known on some famously difficult issues, but the reader does not need to agree with him to follow the text. Recommended for undergraduate and graduate students, professional scientists and philosopher, and lay readers with an active interest in philosophy or physics. - M.C Ogilvie, Washington University.
 

New Books - September 2000.

Quantum physics has many extraordinary implications. One of the most extraordinary is the events at the atomic and subatomic level seem to depend on the future as well as the past. Is time really reversible? Physicist Victor Stenger say yes, arguing that at its deepest level reality is literally timeless. And, with this reality, it is possible that many universes exist with different structures and laws from our own.
 

USA Today Dec. 15, 2000.

With the holiday rush upon us, it's tempting to think that time matters a great deal. But that may be a mistake, suggests physicist Victor Stenger as he dives into the quantum realm - the tiny spaces where part of atoms appear in more than one place simultaneously, blink in and out of existence, and generally defy understanding.
Rather than meaning nothing or indicating that the universe continuously branches off into new realities, as some physicists argue, the author suggests that quantum events show time reverses itself freely at the subatomic level.
Although aimed at the general reader, Timeless Reality is not the easiest read on the bookshelf. The payoff comes for the reader with a glimpse into the debate over the nature of reality.
 

Discover Magazine January 2001.

In clear, simple prose, physicist Stenger bravely explores quantum theory's most complex and challenging implications - that reality is fundamentally timeless and that time itself may be reversible.
 

Today's Books Dec. 8, 2000

! ! ! ! ! Must Read. Originality, content, style, author
Because at the level of quantum phenomena time may be reversible, there could be multiple universes arrayed differently than our Universe and operating upon different scientific principles.
 

Book News Jan. 8, 2001.

If you complained to Stenger (physics and astronomy, U. of Hawaii) that you had not time, he would shrug and say nothing does. He explains to educated lay readers that time is reversible and that the underlying reality of all phenomena may have no beginning and no end. He argues that based on established principles of simplicity and symmetry, at its deepest level reality is literally timeless, and that many universes may exist with different structure and laws from this one.
 


Links to Reviews of The Unconscious Quantum


Herbert Gintis, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, here .

Times Literary Supplement, London 27 Dec. 1996, click here.





Reviews of Physics and Psychics


From Publishers Weekly
A particle physicist at the University of Hawaii, Stenger sets forth a purely materialist, reductionist view of the universe. The transcendent--gods, spirits, religious or mystical experiences--is delusory, in his reckoning. He further maintains that paranormal phenomena such as precognition or mind-over-matter are due to fraud, hallucination, error or a will to believe. Whether he is discussing ESP, poltergeists, UFOs, or out-of-body or near-death experiences, he ignores, misrepresents or skims over evidence that would contradict his thesis, while maintaining an aura of detached objectivity. Claiming that religious or supernatural beliefs may be programmed into our DNA because they once had survival value, Stenger rejects the holism of New Age Thinkers and physicists, disputing their claim that instantaneous connections link events across space and time.
Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal
Stenger is an elementary particle physicist, an atheist, a skeptic, and an ardent defender of the scientific method. He uses the principle of Occam's razor (the simplest explanation is the best) and the test of the predictive value of a model to show how little evidence there is for paranormal claims, including religious beliefs, as well as ESP, astrology, and spirit channeling. Some of Stenger's ideas are controversial even among scientists, and he tends to explain all human qualities by just saying they are an evolutionary advantage. However, this book provides an interesting overview of both skeptical and credulous physics and much material for discussion. A good purchase for undergraduate science collections.
- Amy Brunvand, Fort Lewis Coll., Durango, Col.
Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From Book News, Inc.
Stenger (physics, U. of Hawaii) critically examines theories of a transcendent reality in terms of what is currently known about matter at its most fundamental level. He offers a convincing rebuttal to those who attempt to link physics to mystical truths. Annotation copyright Book News, Inc. Portland, Or.



Reviews of Not By Design

See Amazon.com.

31 of 39 people found the following review helpful:
Fantastic! , October 19, 1998
Reviewer: A reader
This book makes a compelling case for the idea that the universe didn't  come about through the handywork of some magical space pixie. The naysayers  will throw about their arguments from incredulity while kicking &  screaming but, in the end, even they (if anything like a rational mind  still inhabits their bodies) will be forced to admit that this concept  deserves serious consideration. Once, it was considered common sense that  the sun moved around the Earth. "Look up at the sky and see it for  yourself!", they would exclaim. But the thinking mind will take the  known facts and discard the hypothesises that don't have compelling  evidence to support them in favor of the ones that do. Thus far, only a  superstitious mind would put the intelligent design idea into the latter  category.