Introduction to Philosophy 1000

 

 

 

 

Updated:  06/16/2006 9:31 AM

 

 

You may also access the course at http://webct.colorado.edu .  You will need your identikey login to access the course.  Webct is easier to navigate.  A course calendar, reading schedule, and class discussion list can all be found here. 

 

Instructor:  Mr. Matthew (Matt) Roberts

 

Meeting Place and Times: 

1000-130:  Ekeley Sciences E1B50, 2:00-3:15 Tu-Thr

1000-140:  ECON, 3:30-4:45 117, Tu-Thr

 

Exams will be given in the same classroom

 

Office Hours:  I am available before and after class with few exceptions.  I am also available by appointment if these times do not work for you.  You may schedule an appointment with me in person or by e-mail.

 

Email:  Matthew.Roberts("at" sign)Colorado.edu (This is the best way to get a hold of me.)

 

Telephone:  303-664-0772 (This is my home phone, so please call only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 9 p.m.)

 

Mailbox:  Hellems 167 (The Philosophy Department Office).  The office is on the first floor and east end of Hellems.  If you need to turn something in to me, just request that the paper be placed in my box.

 

Course Description:  This course is designed to introduce the student to the broad discipline of philosophy.  Of all the disciplines, philosophy asks the deepest and most far-reaching questions.  It also asks some of the most difficult questions to answer.  Our introduction will look at five primary areas of philosophy:  philosophy of religion, epistemology, metaphysics (human freedom and philosophy of mind), ethics, and political philosophy.  Though each of these branches differs greatly in their area of exploration, each uses the same basic tools of logic, reason, and argumentation.  Hence, our first step will be to focus on these common tools used by all philosophers to get at the truth of the matter.

 

 

Required Texts: 

 

Does the Center Hold:  An Introduction to Western Philosophy, 3rd edition, by Donald Palmer;  ISBN # 0767415809.

           

            Reason and Responsibility:  Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy, 12th edition, Eds. Joel Feinberg and Russ Shafer-Landau, ISBN # 0-534-62558-4 (There is a paperback edition available).

 

Both are available in the C.U. bookstore and the Colorado Bookstore (on the Hill).  Books may also be found at various on-line sources like http://www.addall.com.  If ordering on-line, make sure you get the right edition (easily checked by using the ISBN number listed above).

 

There may be a few articles put on reserve in the Norlin Library.  If so, you can only access them online. See the reading schedule for these items.  If you’re connecting to C.U. from off campus, you will need your identikey and password to access these articles.  Or, alternatively, you may use a VPN connection. 

 

Assessment:  There will be three exams each worth 20% of your overall grade.  Each exam will cover 1/3 of the course material, so the third exam, given during the final exam period, will not be cumulative.  Two of five possible précis will be worth 15% each.  Class participation and attendance (10%) will account for the remaining portion of your total grade.  No extra credit will be available. 

 

Jump to Heading:

 

Academic Integrity

Attendance Policy/Religious Observances

Class Rule

Class Participation

Disabilities

Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Statement

Exams

Important Dates

Lecture Notes

Paper Key 

Précis

Schedule of Readings

Success in this Class

Tips on Doing, Reading, and Writing Philosophy

Wait List

 

 

Wait List:  No students will be allowed into the course off of the wait list.  Normally, several students drop a course in the first two weeks of a semester.  Students on the wait list for the course are then automatically let into the course by the university's computer system depending on their position on the wait list.  Beyond this automatic process, however, the instructor cannot allow additional people into the course.  If a student enrolled in the course is absent the first two days of class, that student will be dropped by the instructor from the course, thus automatically allowing one student into the course off of the wait list. 

 

Attendance Policy/Religious Observances:  There is no required attendance for this course and thus no need for the student to inform the instructor of a reason for his absence.  It behooves the student to be in class for the sake of understanding the material and turning in assignments.  Few students are capable of succeeding in this class without attending.  Since class participation and attendance is part of the student's overall grade, regular attendance is necessary to satisfy this requirement of the course.  If the student must leave class early, it is good to inform the instructor so he'll know why the student is leaving.  Note, if a student is absent from the first two days of class, the instructor will drop the student from the course per the university's policy.  This is done to allow students into the course off of the wait list. 

 

Campus policy regarding religious observances requires that faculty make every effort to reasonably and fairly deal with all students who, because of religious obligations, have conflicts with scheduled exams or assignments.  If a religious observance conflicts with an exam date or précis date, please talk to me at least one week before the conflicting date to make special arrangements.  See additional policy details at

http://www.colorado.edu/policies/fac_relig.html

 

Exams:  Three exams will be given in this course each covering the material immediately preceding the exam.  None of the exams are cumulative, including the last exam which will be given during the final examination period.  Study guides will be provided prior to each exam.  Exams may include essay, true-false, multiple-choice, and short answer questions.  The instructor will inform the class of exam format details upon providing the study sheet.  The exam will cover both lecture and reading material, so it behooves you to stay caught up on your reading.  Students should bring a blue book to each exam.  Blue books can be purchased in the C.U. or Colorado Bookstore.  Make-up exams will only be allowed if the absence is excused by the instructor.  Documentation for a legitimate absence will be necessary to make-up an exam.  Examples of an excused absence include:  sickness or a death in the family.  Assuming the absence is documented (e.g., a doctor’s note or a funeral program), make-ups should be scheduled with the instructor within one week of the exam date. 

 

Précis:  The student will write two précis.  There are five sections of the course (see the reading schedule).  Each section has one assigned article for which the student may write a précis.  The student must write his précis on précis-designated articles only, so make sure that you’re writing on an article designated for précis (see the reading schedule).   

 

What is a précis?

 

A précis (pronounced "pray-see"—it’s French) is a short, concise paper that has two goals.  First, the précis is designed to sift a philosopher's article down to its essential elements (this is the first two-thirds of the précis).  Second, the final third (and it must be a full 1/3 of the précis) is reserved for a short response (in the form of arguments) to the philosopher's article.  In your response section, focus on one or two arguments the author gives and respond to them with your own arguments.  Do not try to respond to the whole article; you don't have enough room to do this.  It is always easier to find something with which you disagree than with which you agree to comment on, however, it is up to you to choose.  If you choose to agree with the author, your strategy should be to anticipate and state potential objections to the author's argument and then provide sound responses to these objections.  You want to avoid saying things like “I thought the author’s argument was really convincing,” but not say how someone might disagree and how the author might respond to these disagreements.  In short, your response should focus on arguments. 

 

What are the requirements for a précis?

 

Précis should be no longer than 750 (about 2 1/2 pages, typed, double-spaced) words each.  A deduction will be made if the précis is longer than 750 words or the response is not a full 1/3 of the précis.  Yes, 751 words is too many words and will count toward a deduction.  A word count should be printed at the bottom of the précis.  Most word processing programs have a "word count" feature (e.g., in Microsoft Word, go to 'Tools', then 'Word Count').  Use the word count tool, then type the word count number at the end of the précis.  There is no penalty if the précis is shorter than 750 words, though most précis will require this many words to adequately summarize and respond to the article.  You will find that it can be quite difficult to get everything in that you want to say in only 750 words, but this is the primary goal of the précis:  to force you to write concisely and precisely about complicated ideas.

 

What should I keep in mind when writing a précis?

 

To write a good précis, one must be very familiar with the article being summarized.  Hence, it is recommended that the student read the article several times to become fully acquainted with it.  One effective tool in writing précis is the use of a detailed analytical outline.  While an outline is not a required part of this assignment, doing one can enable one to write a clearer précis.  If you want to look at examples of good student précis check these out:  précis on W.T. Stace's "Compatibilism", précis on J.L. Mackie's "Evil and Omnipotence".  One of the keys to a good précis is making your first paragraph a good summary of the entire précis.  See if you can pull this off in three to four sentences.  Students are invited and encouraged to visit with the instructor in order to talk through the précis before turning it in.  Drafts may be submitted, but must generally be reviewed with the instructor in person. 

 

Here is a paper key with the abbreviations that the instructor uses when grading student papers.  Students should familiarize themselves with this key in order to know what the instructor looks for in a successful précis.  Grammar and style are especially important in a philosophy paper.  As Jane Healy observes, "the way people use language is braided together tightly with the way they think."[1]  Since philosophers and philosophy students are in the business of thinking, we want to write as clearly as possible. 

 

What should the format of a précis be and what if I turn it in late?

 

Note, students should put only their student number on their précis.  This preserves anonymity and assures both the student and the instructor that content, and nothing else, like personality, is being graded.  Précis are due at the beginning of class, so make sure you're on time as once the papers are picked up, any subsequent précis will be counted as late.  A 10% deduction will be levied for every school day the précis is late.  For example, if the précis is due on a Thursday and you turn it in Monday, that’s 3 days or a 30% deduction.  If the précis is turned in on the day it is due, but not at the beginning of class, a 10% deduction will be levied.  There are no legitimate excuses for late précis (e.g., faulty printers, disks, software, etc.; the post-college world is full of deadlines for which an empty ink cartridge won’t suffice to explain why a job is incomplete.  Save yourself enough time to take care of printer and computer problems.)   My suggestion:  show up to class 5-10 minutes early that day, just to be safe.  A hard-copy (no e-mail submissions will be accepted) must be given to the instructor in person (not by a friend).  Précis will be returned as soon as is practically possible (usually about two weeks).  Précis due dates can be found in the reading schedule.  There will be ­­5 different opportunities to write the two required précis.  Précis should be typed, double-spaced, stapled, and have page numbers on each page (though the first page may be excluded).  Show that you care about your work by taking care of the little things.  Précis are graded 50% summary and 50% response.   

 

Lecture Notes:  As in all college courses, it is strongly recommended that you take notes during lecture and while you read.  I find that reading notes are often best taken in the text itself.  For your benefit, lecture notes will be posted on the web for each lecture.  Just click on the link for that day’s lecture.  Note:  Old copies of lectures are available prior to class.  Current versions of the power point slides will be posted within a week after a given lecture.  Some students like to print out lecture notes before they come to class as a lecture aid.  Feel free to do so if this is helpful.  Sometimes, current versions of the notes will differ substantially from the old lecture notes. 

 

Disabilities:  If you qualify for accommodations because of a disability, please submit a letter to me from Disability Services by 1/31/06 so that your needs may be addressed.  Disability Services determines accommodations based on documented disabilities.  Contact: 303-492-8671, Willard 322, or

www.Colorado.EDU/disabilityservices

 

Academic Integrity:  All students of the University of Colorado at Boulder are responsible for knowing and adhering to the academic integrity policy of this institution. Violations of this policy may include: cheating, plagiarism, aid of academic dishonesty, fabrication, lying, bribery, and threatening behavior.  All incidents of academic misconduct shall be reported to the Honor Code Council (honor@colorado.edu; 303-725-2273). Students who are found to be in violation of the academic integrity policy will be subject to both academic sanctions from the faculty member and non-academic sanctions (including but not limited to university probation, suspension, or expulsion).   I have a no tolerance policy for all violations of academic integrity.  Should you be found in violation of the academic integrity policy, you will fail this course.  Additional information on the Honor Code can be found at http://www.colorado.edu/policies/honor.html  and at http://www.colorado.edu/academics/honorcode/ .

 

Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Statement: The University of Colorado policy on Sexual Harassment and the University of Colorado policy on Amorous Relationships applies to all students, staff and faculty.  Any student, staff or faculty member who believes s/he has been the subject of discrimination or harassment based upon race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, or veteran status should contact the Office of Discrimination and Harassment (ODH) at 303-492-2127 or the Office of Judicial Affairs at 303-492-5550.  Information about the ODH and the campus resources available to assist individuals regarding discrimination or harassment can be obtained at http://www.colorado.edu/odh.

 

Success in this Class:  Philosophy is hard.  It takes work and lots of patience.  But it is ultimately rewarding and has tremendous application in virtually all disciplines—and just everyday life.  Success is primarily up to the student.  While effort is not the sum total of one's grade, it is the larger part.  If one puts in the effort (reading, studying (not merely cramming), re-reading, thinking), she will be far more likely to succeed.  The instructor is here to help you gain a good handle on the material that we are studying.  Utilize the instructor and ask questions if you are unclear about something.  One key to success that I have found in teaching this course is that careful attention to the detailed instructions found on this syllabus seems to mark successful students.  So, pay careful attention to instructions for assignments, especially précis.  Here are some tips on doing, reading, and writing philosophy.  Also, it is much easier to study one's notes throughout the semester than to cram right before an exam.  There is a lot of information in this class and it can't really be learned in a short period of time.  It may in fact take less time to review one's notes after class, again at the end of the week, and once again before an exam than to try and cram everything in right before an exam. 

 

Class Rule:  There is only one class rule for this course:  You may do whatever you want as long as it doesn't cause a problem for anyone else.  Of course, this covers a great deal of various behaviors.  Essentially, this rule is founded on mutual respect between the student and instructor.  The instructor seeks to treat each of his students with utmost respect, recognizing his unique individuality and her tremendous potential for greatness in all walks of life.  Alternatively, the instructor expects respect from his students.  Since the instructor invests a significant portion of his time in preparation for the course and seeks to make the class a rewarding and enriching experience for each student, shows of disrespect by a student do cause a problem for the instructor (and thus, violate the class rule).  The most common example of such behavior is talking while the instructor is lecturing or ostensibly showing a failure to be engaged during class sessions (reading extra-class material like "The Onion", sleeping, staring out the window for the whole class period, etc.).  Students and faculty each have responsibility for maintaining an appropriate learning environment.  For more details on the expectations of the university for classroom behavior and potential consequences for failing to meet these expectations, see http://www.colorado.edu/policies/classbehavior.html  and http://www.colorado.edu/studentaffairs/judicialaffairs/code.html#student_code .

 

Class Participation:  Philosophy is an interactive discipline that involves the process of inquiry using verbal and written communication.  Thus, participation in class is one way to measure the student’s interaction with the course material.  Students will be graded based on a variety of factors including but not limited to:  class attendance, class discussions, on-line discussions (you must use Web CT for this), class debates, and one-one-one discussions with the instructor at the end of class.  Each student will participate in a 7 minute one-on-one discussion with the instructor at the end of one class period during the semester.  The readings for that day will be the primary topic of discussion, but may include other aspects of the course; this is a friendly discussion, not an oral quiz, but the student should have read the readings for that day in order to have a discussion.  If there are no volunteers for the one-on-one, a student will be selected at random.  This one-on-one discussion cannot be scheduled in advance or done outside of class.

 

Important Dates:

 

Exam #1  Thursday, February 16th (in class)

Exam #2  Tuesday, April 4th (in class)

Exam #3 During Final Exam Period:

 

PHIL 1000-130 (Meets Tues.-Thurs. 2-3:15) Saturday, May 6, 4:30-7 p.m.

PHIL 1000-140 (Meets Tues.-Thurs. 3:30-4:45) Tuesday, May 9, 10:30 a.m.-1 p.m.

 

 

 

Précis Due Dates: 

 

(You must and may only do two; see the reading schedule for details).

 

#1  Thursday 2/2

#2  Thursday 3/2

#3  Thursday 3/16

#4  Thursday 4/13

#5  Tuesday 4/18

 

 

 

 



[1]   Jane M. Healy, Endangered Minds:  Why Children Don't Think and What We Can Do About It (New York:  Simon & Schuster, 1990), 105.