< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
Alan Kerns on Getting To The Point
by wesburt
14 January 2004 19:34 UTC
Dear Alan,
Thanks for the thoughtful words of encouragement
and the back handed compliments. I feel your pain!
My particular on the job training enabled me to see
this subject complete when FORTUNE magazine
displayed a 166 year profile of the US Consumer Price
Index on the center fold of its October 1966 issue. The
transition of the US economy from a cooperative mode
to a highly competitive mode of operation obviously
occurred in the 1890s and remains unchanged to date.
The 20th century saw three massive injections of new
money, which did little but raise the price of goods
and services, and enrich the WHIPs. This continuity of
the status quo, and the effect of the money injections,
is more clearly illustrated on Fig10d, with its log scale
for the CPI, than on Fig10b with its linear scale for
the CPI.
I have inserted comments in the format (WSB
comment WSB) where appropriate in your note and
will propose another point of entrance to my favorite
subject (The Optimum Policy, TOP) below your note.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: Alan Kerns <akerns@iprimus.com.au>
To: ERANet@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:28:11 +1000
Subject: Re: [ERANet] Fw: Getting to the point. Plain talk.
wesburt@juno.com wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~ CUT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"I have it from the horse's mouth; from authors Milton
Friedman, Stephen Zarlenga , and Pat Gunning that
my charts and figures are "not helpful" (to intellectually
gifted WHIPs) because it is not intuitively evident to
them what I am trying to model."
(WSB The WHIPs have understood TOP perfectly since
King Rehoboam, Son Of Solomon, replaced TOP with
"The Divine Right Of Kings." Otherwise they could not
have applied it so consistently to their private sector
affairs, down through the centuries. "To those who
have plenty, much is given. To those with little, even
that little will be taken away." WSB)
~~~~~~~~~~ CUT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Maybe it's got something to do with the byzantine
complexity and deviousness of the system we live
under that your model is as clear as mud to common
garden minds such as mine.
(WSB Those who keep it clear as mud are well paid. WSB)
An economic system worth its salt would be intuitively
sensible to the minds of common folk.
(WSB It will become so as soon as two or three of you
WHIPs stop blowing smoke in the public's face; and
authors John Bunzl, Stephen Zarlenga, Robley E.
George, and W. Curtiss Priest write the missing last
chapters of their several books, which are indeed
welcome additions to my library. WSB)
Rather than trying to model the crazy tangled mess of
what the existing system IS, maybe it would be clearer
to model the intuitively sensible things that the existing
system ISN'T - something Zarlenga does quite clearly
and persuasively in his book, "The Lost Science of
Money".
(WSB They are one and the same, but driven apart
by a 50% implementation of TOP, enforced by the
"principle of subsidiarity," in the public sector of the
English speaking nations since the advent of
industrialization. WSB)
I don't doubt that the highly compressed information in
the diagram is transparently clear to you, Wes, but if
you'll allow me to speak on behalf of the hoi polloi,
it's as impenetrable as a stone wall when I look at it.
(WSB Thanks Alan, for joining the nine lurkers on
my list <TOP@topica.com> and the lurkers on the
list of lists above who are waiting for Pete Peterson
to dispatch an assassin from the basement of Pratt
House, or for Lady Thatcher to dispatch one from
Chatham House. It won't happen!
Since my #157 letter of 1994 to Pete Peterson.
Katharine Graham, and Daniel Patrick Moynihan,
the "powers that be" have raised the US GDP/capita
from 64% of Swiss to 83% of Swiss GDP/capita. The
next US President in 2005 will raise it the rest of the
way, to restore the US to its original high moral
ground, and the US public will never need to know
he reason for their good fortune. Just as the
Germans and Japanese were never told the reason
for their post World War II economic miracles. As
long as the public is uninformed, the WHIPs can
look forward to restoring "the divine right of Kings,"
slowly but surely, later on. WSB)
Alan Kerns
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are in respectable company, Alan, when you
"speak on behalf of the hoi polloi." Messrs. L. Urban
Kohler, William B. Ryan, John Gelles, Dough
Everingham, and many others have hit that same
stone wall. Absent the unique on the job training
that makes it all intuitively obvious, the two best
places for an honest man to start is:
1, The subject index heading on Tithes in the Scofield
Reference Bible, 1909. This is what our four Western
religions taught their WHIPs, but not their congregations.
2, The top view of Fig4.6, showing the synchronous
flows of real GDP and the counter flow of M1.
Notice that the flow of M1 and real GDP is common
to all four elements in the closed loop. How can
anyone justify 100% capitalism for the owners in
the private sector at 90 degrees, and only 50%
capitalism for employees at 270 degrees on the
macro model of a national economy. Both sectors
confront a free market which knows nothing of
their policies, and cares less. Both sectors consist
of reproduceable productive assets, with a finite
life-cycle, that are a free gifts of nature. Both types
of assets require a sustained investment over many
years to bring the asset into production. Because
both sectors are in series (tandem), impairing the
performance of either sector will reduce the
performance of the whole system.
Only the "unthinking" could defend the status quo
of the English speaking peoples.
Kind regards,
Wes Burt

< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home