PBA Home > Institutional Research & Analysis > Surveys > Graduate Student Survey 2005 > Campus/College Results by Student Level  > Program Satisfaction

Graduate Student Survey, Fall 2005

Results by Student Level

Program Satisfaction

 
  Master's Doctoral Total
N Mean N Mean N Mean
Intellectual quality of the faculty 732 4.3 1,110 4.3 1,842 4.3
Intellectual quality of fellow grad students 733 3.9 1,110 3.9 1,843 3.9
Relationship between faculty & grad students 731 3.7 1,107 3.5 1,838 3.6
Program integrates current developments in field 731 3.6 1,107 3.7 1,838 3.7
Program space and facilities 730 3.0 1,108 2.9 1,838 2.9
Overall quality of grad lvl teachng by faculty 732 3.8 1,108 3.5 1,840 3.6
Avail of area courses needed for program 730 3.2 1,105 3.3 1,835 3.2
Quality of academic advising & guidance 731 3.2 1,106 3.2 1,837 3.2
Helpfulness of staff members in dept/prg 730 3.7 1,107 3.8 1,837 3.8
Assistance in finding employment 672 3.1 1,027 3.0 1,699 3.1
Opportunity to interact across disciplines 713 3.0 1,095 3.2 1,808 3.1
Academic standards in my program 727 3.7 1,106 3.6 1,833 3.7
Overall program quality 732 3.7 1,107 3.7 1,839 3.7
 
  Master's Doctoral Total
N Pct N Pct N Pct
Total number of respondents 754 100% 1,140 100% 1,894 100%
Intellectual quality of the faculty 346 46% 507 44% 853 45%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 303 40% 484 42% 787 42%
- - Good 64 8% 110 10% 174 9%
- - Fair 18 2% 8 1% 26 1%
- - Poor 1 0% 1 0% 2 0%
- - No response 22 3% 30 3% 52 3%
Intellectual quality of fellow grad students 163 22% 219 19% 382 20%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 365 48% 583 51% 948 50%
- - Good 167 22% 257 23% 424 22%
- - Fair 34 5% 42 4% 76 4%
- - Poor 4 1% 9 1% 13 1%
- - No response 21 3% 30 3% 51 3%
Relationship between faculty & grad students 140 19% 178 16% 318 17%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 310 41% 403 35% 713 38%
- - Good 193 26% 342 30% 535 28%
- - Fair 65 9% 155 14% 220 12%
- - Poor 23 3% 29 3% 52 3%
- - No response 23 3% 33 3% 56 3%
Program integrates current developments in field 141 19% 283 25% 424 22%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 287 38% 415 36% 702 37%
- - Good 200 27% 266 23% 466 25%
- - Fair 83 11% 106 9% 189 10%
- - Poor 20 3% 37 3% 57 3%
- - No response 23 3% 33 3% 56 3%
Program space and facilities 54 7% 112 10% 166 9%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 194 26% 254 22% 448 24%
- - Good 229 30% 301 26% 530 28%
- - Fair 187 25% 282 25% 469 25%
- - Poor 66 9% 159 14% 225 12%
- - No response 24 3% 32 3% 56 3%
Overall quality of grad lvl teachng by faculty 176 23% 172 15% 348 18%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 292 39% 426 37% 718 38%
- - Good 187 25% 335 29% 522 28%
- - Fair 59 8% 145 13% 204 11%
- - Poor 18 2% 30 3% 48 3%
- - No response 22 3% 32 3% 54 3%
Avail of area courses needed for program 111 15% 158 14% 269 14%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 194 26% 327 29% 521 28%
- - Good 201 27% 340 30% 541 29%
- - Fair 162 21% 206 18% 368 19%
- - Poor 62 8% 74 6% 136 7%
- - No response 24 3% 35 3% 59 3%
Quality of academic advising & guidance 114 15% 170 15% 284 15%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 187 25% 303 27% 490 26%
- - Good 213 28% 323 28% 536 28%
- - Fair 147 19% 212 19% 359 19%
- - Poor 70 9% 98 9% 168 9%
- - No response 23 3% 34 3% 57 3%
Helpfulness of staff members in dept/prg 206 27% 347 30% 553 29%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 260 34% 385 34% 645 34%
- - Good 154 20% 253 22% 407 21%
- - Fair 75 10% 105 9% 180 10%
- - Poor 35 5% 17 1% 52 3%
- - No response 24 3% 33 3% 57 3%
Assistance in finding employment 76 10% 73 6% 149 8%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 159 21% 275 24% 434 23%
- - Good 240 32% 395 35% 635 34%
- - Fair 137 18% 195 17% 332 18%
- - Poor 60 8% 89 8% 149 8%
- - No response 82 11% 113 10% 195 10%
Opportunity to interact across disciplines 73 10% 159 14% 232 12%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 160 21% 293 26% 453 24%
- - Good 229 30% 326 29% 555 29%
- - Fair 180 24% 224 20% 404 21%
- - Poor 71 9% 93 8% 164 9%
- - No response 41 5% 45 4% 86 5%
Academic standards in my program 135 18% 172 15% 307 16%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 319 42% 490 43% 809 43%
- - Good 195 26% 342 30% 537 28%
- - Fair 64 8% 83 7% 147 8%
- - Poor 14 2% 19 2% 33 2%
- - No response 27 4% 34 3% 61 3%
Overall program quality 120 16% 159 14% 279 15%
- - Excellent
- - Very good 333 44% 529 46% 862 46%
- - Good 199 26% 323 28% 522 28%
- - Fair 67 9% 85 7% 152 8%
- - Poor 13 2% 11 1% 24 1%
- - No response 22 3% 33 3% 55 3%

Last revision 08/14/06



PBA Home  |  Strategic Planning  |  Institutional Research & Analysis |  
Budget & Finances |  Questions? Comments? 
15 UCB, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0015, (303)492-8631
 © 2001, The Regents of the University of Colorado