|
PBA Home > Institutional Research & Analysis > Students > UG Graduation & Retention Rates > Relationship Between Family Financial Resources & Graduation/Retention Rates Relationship Between Family Financial Resources & 6-year Graduation Rates, 2nd-Fall Retention RatesThe tables below show the relationship between family financial resources and two variables: (Table 1) 6-year graduation rate, and (Table 2) retention to the 2nd fall, for new fall freshmen entering over a three-year period, divided by residency. “Family resources” is actually Expected Family Contribution (EFC) to the student’s educational expenses, as calculated by the Financial Aid office based on family income and other factors. The amounts calculated for each student, including freshmen and transfers, entering in a given fiscal year are divided into quartiles, with the lowest quartile assigned a value of “1,” next lowest “2,” and so on. Students who do not apply for need-based financial aid have no calculated EFC, but are assumed to have more resources than any student who does apply for aid, and so are assigned a value of “5.” Table 1 shows 6-year graduation rates for new fall freshmen entering in the falls of 1998, 1999, and 2000 – the three most recent entering classes who have had six full years in which to complete their degrees. It shows a positive relationship, for both residents and nonresidents, between family resources and graduation rate – with some exceptions, the higher the resource category, the higher the graduation rate. However, this does not imply that having a lower income in itself causes a lower probability of graduating. Several other factors associated with lower income, including lower scores on measures of academic preparation (standardized test scores and high school grades), student of color status, and first generation status, are also themselves linked to lower graduation rates. Table 2 shows the relationship between family resources and retention to the 2nd fall, for fall freshmen entering in 2003, 2004, and 2005. It shows a similar relationship to that between resources and graduation, although less consistent, and all the same caveats apply. Click here for a similar analysis of the relationship between first-generation college student status and graduation/retention.
Table 1.
6-yr grad rates by family resources category
For new fall frosh entering 1998-2000
Residency status at entry
N R
Grad by 6th summer Grad by 6th summer
N Grad % N Grad %
Family resources category,
1=low
1 212 100 47% 622 355 57%
2 273 129 47% 954 604 63%
3 374 200 53% 1,154 751 65%
4 850 540 64% 1,152 889 77%
5 4,410 2,810 64% 3,913 2,756 70%
All 6,119 3,779 62% 7,795 5,355 69%
Table 2.
2nd fall retention rates by family resources category
For new fall frosh entering 2003-2005
Residency status at entry
N R
Enrolled 2nd fall Enrolled 2nd fall
N Retained % N Retained %
Family resources category,
1=low
1 336 251 75% 1,294 1,104 85%
2 327 222 68% 1,241 1,000 81%
3 514 399 78% 1,490 1,254 84%
4 1,116 910 82% 1,418 1,256 89%
5 4,188 3,397 81% 3,779 3,316 88%
All 6,481 5,179 80% 9,222 7,930 86%
PS - L:\ir\emgt\fa\EFCandGradRate.doc |
|
Last revision 10/22/08 PBA Home | Strategic Planning |  Institutional Research & Analysis |   Budget & Finances | Questions? Comments? 15 UCB, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0015, (303)492-8631 © 2001, The Regents of the University of Colorado |