Map A to Z Index Search CU Home University of Colorado

Planning Budget and Analysis
  Strategic Planning Institutional Research and Analysis Campus Budget and Finances About PBA

PBA Home > Institutional Research & Analysis > Performance Measures > QIS > 1998 > UCB #3

CCHE Quality Indicator System (QIS)
CU-Boulder Fall 1998 Submission

CU-Boulder local indicator 3: Teaching: Valuing, encouraging, and delivering high quality teaching

Evaluation: CU-Boulder demands high quality, effective teaching and allocates substantial resources to the ongoing improvement of teaching by faculty, instructors, and graduate teaching assistants. We pay serious attention to evidence about student learning, satisfaction, and success after graduation. We examine student ratings of instruction every term and use the results for salary, promotion, and tenure decisions. While we are pleased with students' satisfaction with instruction, we regard improvement of teaching as a continuing commitment.
UCB3a Programs devoted to support of teaching
  • CU-Boulder's long-standing, nationally-known Faculty Teaching Excellence Program (FTEP) offers faculty members the opportunity to improve their teaching by learning from their peers. FTEP sposors a lecture series, symposia, workshops, one-on-one videotape consultations, and written publications.
  • Teaching assistants and graduate part-time instructors improve their teaching skills under the direction of professor-mentors. The Graduate Teacher Program, also nationally known, offers instruction in teaching methods, testing, and grading.
  • The President's Teaching Scholars are distinguished teachers and scholars who assist other faculty members in a variety of ways.
  • Several groups, from students to the faculty assembly, offer annual monetary prizes for good teaching.
  • Technology support for faculty members assures that use of technology enhances teaching and learning.
  • Engineering's Integrated Teaching and Learning Lab (ITLL) is designed expressly to make good teaching, and good learning, easier.
UCB3b Programs bringing faculty with diverse backgrounds to the classroom
  • CU-Boulder students benefit from the diverse backgrounds of campus faculty, including 375 foreign scholars on campus each year, many recently hired faculty of color and women faculty, and professionals in business, journalism, law, music, and other fields who teach classes and mentor students.
  • Two programs, the chancellor's fellowship and special opportunity hiring, help departments in hiring women and new faculty members of color, where we complete with other leading national universities. Almost 50% of recent faculty hires have been women, with 20-30% faculty of color.
  • The Regents are currently considering a new faculty title, "professor in residence," which will be used to hire into non-tenure track professorial positions individuals who have appropriate degrees but who have developed expertise in business, engineering, government, K12 education, or the arts.
UCB3c Collection, publication, and use of student ratings of instruction
  • Through our faculty course questionnaire (FCQ) students rate their courses and instructors every term, in every course.
  • Students are quite complimentary about the quality of teaching at CU-Boulder. Almost half of grades assigned by students to instructors are A's, and 80% are A or B.
  • FCQ data are used by students to select courses, by faculty for course improvement, and by administrators for salary, promotion, rehire, and tenure decisions. The FCQ is a true accountability system, ensuring that student satisfaction with courses and teaching is a critical factor in institutional management.
  • Student ratings are also used administratively outside of promotion, tenure, and salary decisions. For instance, the dean of arts and sciences routinely contacts departments and instructors with courses receiving ratings of C or below, to discuss how the course can be improved.
  • Students also assess overall instructional quality and major programs, including curricula, through senior and undergraduate surveys. Ratings of instructional quality, especially in upper-division courses, are uniformly high, but many students are dissatisfied with the core curriculum. Arts and sciences faculty are currently in the process of reviewing the core, relying heavily on results of a special fall 1997 student survey on core requirements particularly.
UCB3d Assessment of learning outcomes and use of the results in improving teaching and curricula See "Assessment and accountability practices at CU-Boulder," written for state-requested indicator 8
UCB3e Attention to teaching excellence in tenure awards
  • Evaluations of teaching, research, and service are used annually in determining salaries. We rely on more extensive evaluations for promotion and tenure decisions, using multiple indicators and sources to evaluate each area.
  • Article X, Laws of the Regents, states that "Tenure may be awarded only to faculty members with demonstrated meritorious performance in each of the three areas of teaching, research or creative work, and service, and with demonstrated excellence in either teaching or research/creative work." Over half of the 112 tenure awards made 1992-1996 were based on demonstrated excellence in teaching; the remainder were based on meritorious teaching plus excellent research.

Summary of local indicators | Next indicator

Last revision 06/02/04


PBA Home  |  Strategic Planning  |  Institutional Research & Analysis  |  
Budget & Finances
  | Questions? Comments? 
15 UCB, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0015, (303)492-8631
 © 2001, The Regents of the University of Colorado