|
PBA Home >
Institutional Research & Analysis>
Admissions & Financial Aid >
Freshman Applicants to Multiple Campuses
Freshman Applicants Applying to Multiple CU Campuses
1991, 1996, and 2001
- Data source was SURDS applicant files for calendar years 1991, 1996, and 2001
(three terms for each year).
- Overall, there has been a marked increase in numbers applying to multiple campuses, from 466 in 1991,
to 622 in 1996, then to 1,081 in 2001, but that is almost entirely a reflection of higher numbers of
applicants, period. The percentages of applicants applying to multiple campuses has increased only
slightly over the years, for the most part. Boulder has remained fairly flat, and Colorado Springs
has increased by 6 (NR) and 8 (Res) percentage points. Denver has shown a larger increase in percentage
of its applicants who apply to multiple campuses - 16 percentage points for nonresidents, 10 for
residents. See Table 1.
- Denver has the largest percentage of applicants who are multiples, followed by Colorado Springs, with
Boulder far behind. See Table 1.
Table 1. Percentage of freshman applicants who apply to multiple CU campuses, by residency and year.
| Campus |
Residency |
Year |
Change 91 vs 01 |
| 1991 |
1996 |
2001 |
| % |
Total Apps |
% |
Total Apps |
% |
Total Apps |
| Boulder |
NR |
1% |
9,672 |
2% |
9,886 |
3% |
12,086 |
+2% |
| Boulder |
Res |
6% |
4,903 |
8% |
5,190 |
9% |
6,556 |
+3% |
| C. Springs |
NR |
28% |
247 |
31% |
434 |
34% |
934 |
+6% |
| C. Springs |
Res |
14% |
695 |
17% |
793 |
22% |
1,548 |
+8% |
| Denver |
NR |
26% |
344 |
37% |
343 |
42% |
618 |
+16% |
| Denver |
Res |
24% |
1,011 |
33% |
87 |
34% |
1,229 |
+10% |
- The most common combination of campuses for nonresidents applying to multiple CU campuses is
Boulder/Colorado Springs, followed by applying to all 3 campuses. The most common combination
for residents is Boulder/Denver, followed by Boulder/Colorado Springs. Comparatively few residents
apply to all three campuses. The numbers of residents applying to Boulder/Colorado Springs and to all
three campuses have increased markedly over the last decade, while the number applying to Boulder/Denver
has shown a relatively small increase. See Table 2.
Table 2. Number of applicants at each combination of campuses, by residency and year.
| Residency |
Combination |
Year |
| 1991 |
1996 |
2001 |
| NR |
BD+CS |
48 |
93 |
160 |
| BD+DN |
71 |
83 |
97 |
| DN+CS |
11 |
15 |
22 |
| All 3 |
9 |
28 |
140 |
| Res |
BD+CS |
84 |
113 |
239 |
| BD+DN |
229 |
270 |
315 |
| DN+CS |
10 |
9 |
43 |
| All 3 |
4 |
11 |
65 |
- The Boulder admit rate for freshmen applying to multiple CU campuses was much lower than the
overall Boulder admit rate in each year studied. In 2001, for example, the admit rate was 44%
for nonresidents and 60% for residents, compared to overall admit rates of 78% and 81% for nonresidents
and residents, respectively. (Note that admit rates are calculated as a percentage of all applicants,
even those that may not present complete credentials.)
- The Boulder yield for nonresident admits who applied to multiple CU campuses was higher than the overall
nonresident yield in 2001 (32% vs. 24%); for residents the yield was lower (43% vs. 53%). The same
pattern also occurred in the two earlier years.
- Nonresidents admitted to Boulder and another CU campus(es) are 2 to 4 times more likely to enroll at
Boulder than at the other CU campus. Residents admitted to Boulder are also more likely to enroll
at Boulder than at the other campuses, but only by a factor of 1.2-1.8. See Table 3 below.
Table 3. Freshman apps, calendar year 2001, admitted to multiple CU campuses
| Admitted to |
Residency |
Number |
Percentage enrolling at |
Ratio, BD vs Other CU |
| BD |
CS |
DN |
Not CU |
| BD/CS |
NR |
84 |
31 |
13 |
|
56 |
2.4 |
| Res |
151 |
40 |
33 |
|
27 |
1.2 |
| BD/DN |
NR |
32 |
28 |
|
6 |
66 |
4.7 |
| Res |
176 |
42 |
|
31 |
27 |
1.4 |
| CS/DN |
NR |
16 |
|
13 |
6 |
81 |
|
| Res |
42 |
|
26 |
29 |
45 |
|
| All three |
NR |
23 |
43 |
13 |
0 |
44 |
3.3 |
| Res |
18 |
50 |
22 |
6 |
22 |
1.8 |
Perry Sailor and Lou McClelland
December, 2001 - L:\ir\emgt\adm\multapp.doc
|