Technical support by Planning, Budget and Analysis
BFA-AAP, 1999, Summary : All items, all administrators
Familiarity Respect Responses
with Effectiveness for Overall to Overall
performance Scholarly of faculty administrative Performance
Adminstrator in position credibility leadership views performance item
Buechner, John 1.2 0.8 3.0 2.6 2.9 254
Groth, David 0.7 0.7 2.2 2.3 2.2 85
Byyny, Richard 1.2 1.2 2.7 2.6 2.7 272
DiStefano, Philip 1.3 1.0 2.6 2.9 2.7 252
Gleeson, Todd 1.2 1.4 3.0 3.2 3.0 182
Kaempfer, William 0.7 1.2 2.9 2.9 2.8 85
Schnabel, Robert 1.0 1.5 3.0 3.2 3.1 127
Miramontes, Ofelia 0.6 0.9 2.3 2.5 2.3 81
Foote, Brangwyn 0.6 0.7 2.2 2.4 2.2 70
Colgan, Anne 0.7 0.9 2.9 3.0 2.9 69
Lynch, Carol 1.3 1.3 2.7 2.8 2.8 198
Peterson, R.Jerome 0.9 1.1 2.4 2.6 2.4 101
Taylor, Rodney 1.1 1.1 2.4 2.6 2.4 151
Cruz, Alexander 0.6 1.1 2.5 2.9 2.5 56
Williams, James *** 1.0 0.8 2.3 2.3 2.2 113
Spear, Peter 1.6 1.5 2.5 2.4 2.5 197
Costain, Anne 1.3 1.4 2.9 3.3 3.0 111
Beale, Paul 1.3 1.4 2.8 2.9 2.8 119
Lessley, Merrill 1.2 1.1 3.0 3.2 3.0 91
Bever, Karen 1.2 0.6 2.6 3.0 2.8 79
Nishikawa, Richard 1.4 0.7 2.9 3.1 3.1 111
Corotis, Ross 1.7 0.8 1.7 1.9 1.7 55
Branch, Melvyn 1.6 1.1 2.2 2.3 2.2 53
Lightner, Michael 1.5 1.6 2.9 3.2 2.9 52
Sherman, James 1.6 0.6 3.1 3.5 3.4 48
Lymberopoulos, John 1.8 0.4 1.6 2.0 1.7 30
Palmer, Michael 1.7 0.7 1.8 2.2 1.9 31
Stanley, William 1.8 1.6 2.6 3.2 2.7 21
Swadener, Marc 1.9 0.6 2.2 2.7 2.5 21
O'Leary, Patricia 2.0 0.5 1.6 1.3 1.4 16
Rowland, Willard 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.4 5
Moritz, Marguerite 1.7 1.0 2.3 3.3 2.7 7
Jones, Stephen 1.9 0.7 3.4 3.3 3.4 7
Trager, Robert 1.9 1.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 7
Bruff, Harold 1.8 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.5 17
Waggoner, Michael 1.5 0.2 2.5 3.2 2.6 15
Vigil, Daniel 1.8 0.2 2.3 3.3 2.9 15
Sher, Daniel 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.3 2.2 26
Gille, Tanya 1.5 1.2 2.5 2.8 2.8 23
Hayes, Deborah 2.0 1.7 3.0 3.5 3.1 23
Hill, Willie 1.5 0.9 1.5 2.2 1.6 20
Williams, James 1.7 0.8 2.1 1.9 2.1 16
Anthes, Susan 1.7 0.5 1.9 2.7 2.1 15
Hill, Janet 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.4 15
Seaman, Scott 1.5 1.0 2.4 2.8 2.4 16
Scales: Familiarity and Scholarly Credibility: Low Medium High, 0-2.
Others: F to A, 0-4.
*** By raters not rostered in library
15MAR99 : l:\mgt\aap\report\j11rprt.sas
[AAP Home Page] [PBA Home Page] [BFA Home Page] [CU-Boulder Home Page]