William Stanley, Dean of the School of Education

Appraisal Form  Side B

Please review the Statement of Activities and Accomplishments for William B. Stanley, Dean of the School of Education, as you complete this appraisal. The following nine questions are being used to evaluate all administrators up for review this year. Performance-based questions #10-19 relate specifically to the work of Dean Stanley. If you need additional space for comments, include them on a separate piece of paper with reference to the question number and the administrator. All comments will be transcribed unless illegible.

How effective has this administrator been at: Very Ineffective   Very Effective Don't Know
1. Listening to faculty, staff, and students (whether or not you agreed with his decision) 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
2. Constructively managing conflicts among faculty or staff 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
3. Supporting innovation in teaching 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
4. Supporting innovation in research 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
5. Making decisions in a timely fashion 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
6. Creating an atmosphere of trust 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
7. Treating faculty of all levels, including instructors, in a fair and inclusive way 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
8. Appropriately involving faculty in decisions 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
9. Acting with integrity 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:

 

William Stanley, Dean of the School of Education

Appraisal Form  Side B

  Very Ineffective   Very Effective Don't Know
10. Given that the size of the salary pool is determined at the system and campus level, has the Dean been effective in leading the College to an equitable, merit-based increment salary system? (See enclosed Activities report). 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
11. How effective has the Dean been in providing funding and graduate student support to promote outreach and partnerships with school districts? (See enclosed Activities) 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
12. How effective has the Dean been in providing financial and other assistance to help secure external funding for research? (See enclosed Activities) 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
13. How effectively has the Dean supported the application of educational technology to teaching, research, and outreach? 12 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
14. How successful has the Dean been in recruiting and hiring high quality faculty for open positions? (See Activities)? 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
15. For most of the past two years, the School has had to respond to new State teacher education reforms. How effective has the Dean been in working with representatives of the State (CDE/CCHE) and other units on campus to respond to the reforms mandated by SB 154? (See enclosed Activities) 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
16. Has the Dean effectively fostered an atmosphere that supports diversity in the recruitment of faculty, staff, and students? 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
17. During 1998/99 the School underwent three major program reviews (PRP, NCATE, and CDE). How well did the Dean organize and respond to the program reviews? (See enclosed Activities) 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
18. How well has the Dean worked to achieve an open, supportive, and collaborative administrative structure? (E.g., involvement of faculty in program review, consultation with Dean's Advisory Council, and general communication.) 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS:
19. How effective has the Dean been in representing the School to and working with other parts of the University? 1 2 3 4 5 DK
  COMMENTS: