 |
 |
|
 |
Spring 2002 Seminar Series in Neuroscience
 |
 |
| Tuesday Jan 22, 4-5 pm |
Dr. Nancy Zahniser,
Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience Program, HSC
Regulation of the Dopamine
Transporter: Drugs, Substrates, Presynaptic Receptors
and Signaling Systems
Abstract: The dopamine
transporter (DAT) is crucial for limiting dopaminergic
neurotransmission in the brain. About 10 years ago it
came as somewhat of a surprise to realize that DAT activity
and expression could be regulated not only by chronic
administration of drugs, but also in a more dynamic manner
response to acute stimuli such as substrates, presynaptic
receptors and signaling systems. My talk will focus on
studies from my lab that have provided support for these
different types of DAT regulation. Our studies have utilized
a wide variety of systems from Xenopus oocytes expressing
human DAT to freely-behaving rodents. |
| Tuesday Feb 5, 4-5 pm |
Alcino Silva,
Departments of Neurobiology and Psychology, Brain Research
Institute UCLA
Molecular and cellular mechanisms
of cognitive function and dysfunction
Abstract: Our laboratory
is studying the biology of learning and memory. We are
interested in the molecular, cellular and circuit processes
that underlie the storage and recall of information. To
accomplish this we are using a variety of techniques including
biochemistry, transgenic manipulations, pharmacology,
in vitro and in vivo electrophysiology, neuroanatomical
lesions and behavioral analysis. The focus of our studies
has been on hippocampal dependent learning and memory.
Our results implicate a variety of hippocampal mechanisms
in learning and memory, including long term potentiation,
short-term plasticity, the slow afterhyperpolarization
and synaptic inhibition. We have found mutations that
affect the induction of long-term changes in synaptic
function and learning, and others that affect the stability
of these synaptic changes and memory (but not learning).
For example, our studies have demonstrated that the transcription
factor cAMP responsive element binding protein (CREB)
is critical for the consolidation and reconsolidation
of long-term memory. Our laboratory is also interested
in applying these findings to the development of treatments
for learning and memory disorders, such as those observed
with aging and in neurofibromatosis type I (NF1). For
more information go to www.silvalab.com
|
| Tuesday Feb 19, 4-5 pm |
Richard Olson,
Dept. of Psychology and Institute of Behavioral Genetics
Genes & Environment in Reading
Development
Abstract: This talk will
review behavioral and molecular-genetic research on the
genetic and environmental etiology of dyslexia and related
language disorders. Studies with identical and fraternal
twins have revealed strong genetic influences on reading
disabilities that are shared with disabilities in the
awareness of and manipulation of abstract units of speech
called phonemes. The deficit in phoneme awareness is most
closely linked with the ability to phonologically decode
(i.e., "sound out") new words and nonwords following the
most common rules of English orthography. Another important
skill in reading printed English words is the ability
to recognize and remember the subtle differences in spellings
for words that sound the same (bear, bare). Deficits in
this ability have independent genetic influences as well
as genetic influences that are shared with phonological
reading and language deficits. The molecular genetic research
is still in its early stages, but there have been replicated
findings of linkage to a gene or genes in regions on chromosomes
6 and 18 for several reading-related phenotypes. |
| Tuesday March 5, 4-5 pm |
Jonathan Cohen,
Department of Psychology and Center for the Study of Brain,
Mind, and Behavior, Princeton University
Neural Bases of Cognitive Control:
Computational Modeling and Neuroimaging Studies
Abstract: Cognitive control
is the ability to guide attention, thought and action
in accord with internally maintained goals or intentions.
Several decades of cognitive and neuroscientific research
have focused on the mechanisms by which control influences
processing (e.g., attentional effects in sensory processing,
goal directed sequencing of motor output, etc.), and disturbances
of these mechanisms in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia
and depression. While much has been learned, a major gap
in our understanding concerns the mechanisms that determine
how control is allocated. This presentation will provide
an overview of recent work drawing upon neural network
modeling, fMRI and ERP recordings to understand these
mechanisms. Models will be presented of specific component
processes and their proposed neural implementation, including
the maintenance and updating of control representations
(prefrontal cortex and dopaminergic neuromodulation) and
their influence on task processing, performance monitoring
(anterior cingulate cortex), and the feedback influence
of monitoring on the modulation of control state (locus
coeruleus). In addition to providing new insights into
the mechanisms underlying cognitive control, this work
highlights the value of the combined use of neural network
modeling and measurements of brain function in efforts
to identify and understand the neural bases of cognitive
processes. |
| Tuesday March 19, 4-5 pm |
Andrew Miller,
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory
University School of Medicine
When Not Enough is Too Much:
The Glucocorticoid Deficiency Hypothesis of Stress Related
Disorders
Abstract: Although previous
theories have emphasized the pathological potential of
hypercortisolism in stress-related disorders, more recent
data suggests that deficient glucocorticoid signaling
may have equally devastating effects on bodily function,
related in part to the role of glucocorticoids in restraining
immune activation and inflammation. Neuroendocrine and
immune data support the hypothesis of glucocorticoid deficiency
in a variety of stress-related disorders. Consequent immune
activation may contribute to the pathologies of these
conditions including behavioral symptoms such as depression,
fatigue and pain as well as cell loss in the central nervous
system, decreased bone metabolism, insulin resistance
and impaired acquired immune responses. From an evolutionary
perspective, glucocorticoid deficiency may serve an adaptive
purpose by biasing the immune system during chronic stress
toward more aggressive early, innate immune responses
and possibly mood elevation. Finally, this paradigm shift
from an emphasis on glucocorticoid excess to glucocorticoid
deficiency has treatment implications regarding relevant
therapeutic strategies involving enhancement of glucocorticoid
signaling pathways, in particular glucocorticoid receptor
function. |
| Tuesday April 9, 4-5 pm |
Dr. Diego Restrepo,
Neuroscience Program, Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center,
Department of Cellular and Structural Biology HSC
How the Nose Knows: Emerging
Principles for Natural Odor Representation in the Brain
Abstract: The olfactory
system detects small differences in the composition of
natural odorants, made up of hundreds of molecules. Odorous
quality is hypothetically represented by a combinatorial
code - activation of distinct, but overlapping subsets
of olfactory receptors resulting in activation of a distinct
subset of glomeruli in the olfactory bulb. Here we show
that modification of a single gene (the K gene of the
major histocompatibility locus), which results in a subtle
change in the odiferous quality of urine, causes a small,
but significant change in the glomerular activation pattern.
Moreover, the magnitude of disparity between urine-evoked
glomerular activation patterns is predictive of the extent
of genetic difference among the donors and the receiver's
ability to discriminate. These data show that the combinatorial
code applies to natural odors. |
| Tuesday April 23, 4-5 pm |
Allan Collins,
Institute of Behavioral Genetics & Psychology, University
of Colorado at Boulder
Genetic Approaches Reveal Functions
of Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors
Abstract: Epidemiological
studies have repeatedly demonstrated that alcoholics are
almost invariably smokers, generally very heavy smokers.
King James II commented on this relationship in 1620 when
he noted that the worst smokers were the drunken sots.
One of the major goals of our research team has been to
attempt to explain the booze-butts relationship. Given
that common genes seem to influence alcoholism and smoking
in humans, we have used genetic and neurochemical strategies
in an attempt to identify common actions of alcohol and
nicotine. The results of recent experiments which used
classical genetic strategies and null mutant/gene knockin
approaches to establish roles for specific neuronal nicotinic
receptor subtypes in modulating behavioral responses to
nicotine and ethanol will be discussed. As we go along,
data will be presented which show how gene knockout mice
can be used to answer questions that range from what is
the composition of naturally-occurring neuronal nicotinic
receptors to what role do these receptors play in regulating
"normal" as well as drug-induced behaviors? |
|
|
 |
|