 |
Spring 2009 Seminar Series in Neuroscience
Location of Seminars: Muenzinger E214 (See map
and directions)
 |
 |
| Tuesday Feb
3, 4-5 pm |
Dr.
Michael Oshinsky, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson
University Medical College
TITLE: “Modeling
the Chronification of Headache“
Abstract: In this talk, we will discuss
the development and features of an animal model of chronic
daily headache. Chronic daily headache (CDH) is a neurological
disorder characterized by > 15 headache days per
month and affects up to 4% of the general population!
Most cases of CDH evolve from episodic migraine. CDH
patients experience chronic cranial tenderness (allodynia)
with episodes of increased headache pain. Little is
known about how episodic headache progresses and transforms
into CDH. Of course, we start off the discussion by
answering the most important question: How do you know
if a rat has a headache?
|
| Tuesday Feb
17, 4-5 pm |
Dr.
Morris Moscovitch,
Max and Gianna Glassman Chair in Neuropsychology and Aging,
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
TITLE: "
The Hippocampus As a “Stupid,” Domain-Specific
Module: Implications for Theories of Recent and Remote
Memory, and of Imagination"
Abstract: The hippocampus and surrounding
regions of the medial temporal lobe play a central role
in all neuropsychological theories of memory. It is still
a matter of debate, however, how best to characterize
the functions of these regions, the hippocampus in particular.
In this article, I examine the proposal that the hippocampus
is a “stupid” module whose specific domain
is to consciously apprehend information. A number of interesting
consequences for the organization of memory and the brain
follow from this proposal and the assumptions it entails.
These, in turn, have important implications for neuropsychological
theories of recent and remote episodic, semantic, and
spatial memory and for the functions that episodic memory
may serve in perception, comprehension, planning, imagination,
and problem solving. I consider these implications by
selectively reviewing the literature and primarily drawing
on research my collaborators and I have conducted. |
| Tuesday Mar
3, 4-5 pm |
Dr.
Peter Kalivas, Professor and Chair, Department of Neurosciences,
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
TITLE: “Giving Addicts
a Choice by Restoring Excitatory Neuroplasticity”
Abstract: Using addictive drugs can
evolve from controlled social use into the compulsive
relapsing disorder that characterizes addiction. This
transition to addiction results from genetic, developmental,
and sociological vulnerabilities, combined with pharmacologically
induced plasticity in brain circuitry that strengthens
learned drug-associated behaviors at the expense of
adaptive responding for natural rewards. Advances over
the last decade have identified the brain circuits most
vulnerable to drug-induced changes, as well as many
associated molecular and morphological underpinnings.
This growing knowledge has contributed to an expanded
understanding of how drugs usurp normal learning circuitry
to create the pathology of addiction, as evidenced by
involuntary activation of reward circuits in response
to drug-associated cues and simultaneous reports of
drug craving. This new understanding provides unprecedented
opportunities for novel pharmacotherapeutic targets
in treating addiction. There appears to be plasticity
associated with the addiction drugs. These findings
also provide the basis for the current understanding
of addiction as a chronic, relapsing disease of the
brain with changes that persist long after the last
use of the drug. Here, we describe the neuroplasticity
in brain circuits and cell function induced by addictive
drugs that is thought to underlie the compulsions to
resume drug-taking, and discuss how this knowledge is
impelling exploration and testing of novel addiction
therapies.
|
| Tuesday March
17, 4-5 pm |
Dr.
Erik Willcutt,
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at
Boulder
TITLE: “Using Neuroscience
and Genetics to Understand the “Whirling Ball
of Comorbidity”: ADHD, Learning Disabilities,
and Related Disorders.”
Abstract: Until
recently most cognitive models of mental disorders suggested
that each disorder resulted from a single core neurocognitive
deficit that was caused by a specific genetic or environmental
risk factor. However, these single-deficit theories
are challenged by the frequent comorbidity, or co-occurrence,
of two or more different disorders in the same individual.
This presentation will describe clinical, neuropsychological,
and genetic approaches that we have used to test competing
explanations for comorbidity between reading disability
(RD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Results from our study and others suggest that RD and
ADHD are each influenced by at least ten different genes,
and subset of these genes increase risk for both disorders.
Contrary to the predictions of single-deficit models,
neuropsychological analyses suggest that these shared
genetic influences lead to significant weaknesses in
working memory, cognitive speed, and sustained attention
in both disorders. In contrast, RD is uniquely associated
with deficits in phonological decoding, whereas ADHD
is more strongly associated with poor inhibitory control.
Rather than a nuisance variable or an indicator of a
flawed diagnostic system, comorbidity may be a useful
tool to dissect the relations between complex disorders.
A better understanding of the boundaries between diagnoses
and the causes of comorbidity will help to refine the
diagnostic nosology of psychological disorders in DSM-V
and beyond.
|
| Tuesday April
8, 4-5 pm |
Dr.
Gyorgy Buzsaki, Center for Molecular and Behavioral
Neuroscience, Rutgers University
TITLE:
“Internally
Generated Cell Assembly Sequences In the Services of
Cognition”
Abstract: A long-standing conjecture
is that aspects of cognition depend on the brain’s
ability to self-generate sequential neuronal activity.
We found that reliably and continually changing cell
assemblies in the rat hippocampus appeared not only
during spatial navigation but also in the absence of
changing environmental or body-derived inputs. During
the delay period of memory task, each moment in time
was characterized by the activity of a particular assembly
of neurons. Identical initial conditions triggered a
similar assembly sequence, whereas different conditions
gave rise to different sequences, thereby predicting
behavioral choices, including errors. Such sequences
were not formed in control (nonmemory) tasks. We hypothesis
that neuronal representations, evolved for encoding
distance in spatial navigation, also support episodic
recall and the planning of action sequences.
|
Tuesday
April 21, 4-5 pm |
Dr.
Albert Kim,
Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado
at Boulder
TITLE: “TBA”
Abstract: |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |