AND THE VOICES OF TRAUMA, continued... |
|
|
|
Wendy Rose's personae poems subvert this paradigm, to give new life to, and render forgotten truths in, the lives of two indigenous women: Truganinny, the last of the Tasmanian tribe in Australia, and Julia the "Lion Woman," a Mexican Indian dubbed "the Ugliest Woman in the World." "Truganinny"(29) begins with an epigraph dated 1972, from Paul Coe, Australian Aboriginal Activist, stating that Truganinny "had seen the stuffed and mounted body of her husband and it was her dying wish that she be buried in the outback or at sea for she did not wish her body to be subjected to the same indignities. Upon her death, she was nevertheless stuffed and mounted and put on display for over eighty years" (240). Rose's persona poem finds Truganinny slowly dying, enjoining the reader "to come closer/ for little is left/ of this tongue/ and what I am saying/ is important." As in the epigraph, she pleads, "Please/ take my body/ to the source of night/ to the great black desert/ where Dreaming was born./. . .put me where/ they will not/ find me" (241). The historical silence in the accounts of indigenous women lends a special importance to these re-visions, where hegemony is destabilized by the interruptions of the dead, inscribing themselves for the first time. Rose brings this same project to her two poems on the indigenous Mexican woman, Julia Pastrana (1832-1860), who was born with a congenitally deformed facial structure, and hair growing from all parts of her body. Billed in a circus as "The Ugliest Woman in the World" and "The Lion Lady," Pastrana married her business manager, believing he loved her for her "own sake," rather than for her earnings. Their child inherited a physical weakness that killed him after just six hours of life; within a week, Julia was also dead. Her husband had the pair stuffed and mounted in a case, from which they were exhibited in the U.S. and Europe as recently as 1975.(30) In "Julia," Rose takes on the persona to indict the husband: "my rigid lips, silences/ dead as yesterday, cruel as what/ the children say, cold/ as the coins that glitter/ in your pink fist" (128). In a related poem, Rose pays homage to Pastrana, in "Sideshow: Julia the Lion Woman, The Ugliest Woman in the World."(31) Subverting this label, the speaker proclaims, "I call you/ the most beautiful she-wolf,/ the highest-flying canary,/ the most ancient song,/ the most faithful magic./ I call you/ my mother and my sister/ and my daughter and me" (99). "The difference between poetry and rhetoric," writes Audre Lorde, "is being/ ready to kill/ yourself/ instead of your children." Lorde's 1975 "Power,"(32) about racial violence enacted by the police, and the contamination of justice in U.S. courtrooms, turns on a complex theme of the interconnectedness of impotence and power. A traditional free verse poem in the main body of the text, in the final stanza the speaker takes on the persona of a young Black man who threatens violence out of rage:
One of Audre Lorde's most well-known poems is a persona piece titled, "Need: A Choral of Black Women's Voices,"(33) which, although widely anthologized, has been published as a separate chapbook, aimed at helping women conditioned by violence. Drawing on the domestic violence murders of Patricia Cowan and Bobbie Jean Graham "and the 100's of other mangled Black women whose nightmares inform my words," Lorde constructs her poem as a performance piece, with the figures of Cowan and Graham foregrounded in the testimonies against violence. Cowan's persona, describing her death, says, "I was anxious to get back to work/ thought this might be a good place to start/ so on the way home from school with Bubba/ I answered the ad./ He put a hammer through my head" (31). Next, Graham describes her own murder:
Giving voice to these lost lives is an aspect of the potential for activism in this poem; this effort toward coalition building is also inscribed in the "I" persona and the chorus, "All," who operate in a call-and-response style throughout the work. A shift in the general mood of the works studies here thus far is signaled in Ai's "The Good Shepherd: Atlanta, 1981," a persona account of the Atlanta child murders. Told from the perspective of the perpetrator, the poem describes a man who sees himself, as do so many of Ai's personae, as acting in accord with God, under constant threat of evil. Watching his most recent kill "roll/ down into the river," the man is musing over the need for a new coat, "not polyester, but wool,/ new and pure/ like the little lamb/ I killed tonight" (27). Then, with "that same hand that hits/ with such force,/ I push myself up gently" (ibid.). The killer's thoughts next turn to the comforts of home-"hot cocoa by the heater" -- but this idyll is interrupted, once in his kitchen, by the remembrance of blood:
This portrayal, a much less sympathetic persona than the figures examined thus far, grounds the study of perspective in a more abrupt, less ambiguous manner: no sympathy, as they say, for the devil. Like Ai's "Good Shepherd," the neo-nazi speaker in Patricia Smith's "Skin Head" (1994)(34) postures as a self-important minister of justice. Describing the ritual of shaving his head, he reveals, "These are the duties of the righteous,/ the ways of the anointed" (277). The anger of this persona, too, is culturally-rooted: he is a white male who hasn't worked since his hand was mutilated in a machine while on the job. That he describes his face in the mirror as "huge and pockmarked" may speak of a working- or lower-class background, and his assertion that "I am filled with my own spit" describes both an kind of emptiness and an angry self-reliance. "I sit here," he says,
The profiles here of mass murderers and perpetrators of hate crimes brings to mind an unsettling parallel to the figures of the "American hero" and the Christian missionary studied throughout these works. Here, as in "The Good Shepherd," there is an explicit focus on dominion over, or complete removal of, the body of difference.
"Ain't got no job," the skin-head reasons, "the coloreds and the spics got 'em all./ Why ain't I working? Look at my hand, asshole" (279). This persona claims no allegiance with any group; he repeats, instead, the oath sworn by so many like him in recent media interviews: "I'm just a white boy who loves his race,/ fighting for a pure country" (ibid.). Here, again, the paradigm of purity is juxtaposed against the perceived "invasion" or "contamination" of difference, in yet another reversal of innocence and agency. The poet inscribes this figure as offspring of the legacy of violence and conquest:
The bounds of race and nationalism perversely locate the black boy who is the speaker of Sapphire's "Wild Thing"(35) as the skin-head's opposite, yet equal. This poem gives voice to a member of the group of young black men who gang-raped the "Central Park Jogger," and called it "wilding." Riding his bike, the boy describes his tires as "eating up the ground/ of America/ even tho I never been any/ further than 42nd Street" (266-67). The alienation of this persona, like that of the skin-head, is palpable, and starved for reconnection from a perceived loss:
In keeping with the Christian iconographies associated with so much of the violence in this canon (cf. Ai, Scarry, Spillers) is the familiar imagery of how the boy smashes open his world, to "christen it with/ blood." And, like the other perpetrators described here, the boy claims that there is power in his vengeance: "my dick is/ the Empire State Building./ I eat your fear/ like a chimpanzee/ on its 6th bunch of green bananas/ ow!" (ibid.). Keeping in mind gossett's rendition of "king kong," Sapphire's inscription of a black male buying into the symbols of white exclusionary practice is especially incisive. The speaker describes his home as "a cage of cabbage/ & my mother's fat/ hollering don't do this/ & don't do that" (267). His hatred of his mother is conditioned by the blame he places on her for the poverty of living in the projects, and for keeping him "in classes/ for the mentally retarded/ so she could get the extra money welfare gives/ for retarded kids" (270)--a conditioning with so tight a grip, he feels he must constantly compensate, by purveying expensive clothes and jewelry from the welfare check. These compensatory efforts fail, ultimately, and the boy prides himself on inverting his shame:
Undermining savagely the empathy the reader may feel for Ai's priest in his loss of faith, this boy relates a further incident in the making of a rapist: "Christ sucked my dick/ behind the pulpit./ I was six years old,/ he made me promise/ not to tell/ no one" (270). Later in his litany of anger and sin, the boy asserts, "My dick is a locomotive/ my sister eats like a 50c hot dog" (271). With this final recollection, the boy is "running/ running" out through Central Park, with his posse, "looking for Lt. Calley/ Jim Jones/ anybody who could direct/ this spurt of semen" (ibid.). As his "soul sinks/ to its knees &/ howls under the moon/ rising full," the boy shouts, "Let's get a female jogger!" (272). They "grab the bitch," and the speaker recounts:
Transferring his rage, the boy announces, "Her nipples are like/ hard strawberries/ my mouth tastes/ like pesticide" (273). As the other boys also beat and rape the woman, the speaker tells how "I feel good baby/ I just did/ the wild thing!" (273-74). A similar cockiness and pride of "ownership" is inscripted in the Texas Ranger persona of Gloria Anzaldúa's "We Call Them Greasers."(36) "I found them here when I came," boasts the speaker, in that historically Anglo-European excitement of "discovery":
That the speaker willfully misreads Mexican courtesy as self-effacement is of keen importance to the poem, where the methods of stealing lands, brutalizing and raping individuals is painstakingly recounted:
The speaker here sandwiches "children" and "wives" between "chickens" and "pigs," demonstrating the prevalent attitudes of the late nineteenth century, as described earlier, which determined people of color to share qualities with the "lower beasts." Again, the inversion of innocence and agency is clearly, and casually, attested: "Oh, there were a few troublemakers/ who claimed we were the intruders." The lackadaisical attitude of conquest, and the appropriation of the "spoils" of battle, are here encoded not only in the usurpation of the land, but in the unrelenting violence that continues even after the claim is staked:
That the rapist's contempt for the woman is spurred not by any action of her own, but by the recognition of her husband's pain in witnessing the attack, underscores, as in the above poems, the violent, rather than sexual nature of the act. The speaker here, having control over so much, could not silence a husband's devotion -- the "keening" expression of vulnerability so threatening to the misappropriation of power. |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
About Standards |
![]() |
||