List of Figures



next up previous
Next: About this document Up: Extended Depth of Field Previous: References

List of Figures

  
Figure 1: Ambiguity function of rectangular aperture. The radial line has a slope of corresponding to an OTF with misfocus of .

  
Figure 2: Misfocus OTF of the standard optical system with misfocus parameter of .

  
Figure 3: Magnitude of the ambiguity function of the cubic-pm function with . Notice that radial lines through this function are insensitive to angle, for a broad range of angles.

  
Figure 4: Magnitude of the OTF of the cubic-pm system with and misfocus of . The smooth curve is the stationary phase approximation of the OTF. The other curve is the calculated OTF.

  
Figure 5: Magnitude of OTFs from the cubic-pm system with and misfocus of 0, 15, and 30.

  
Figure 6: Magnitude of OTFs from the standard optical system. The solid line denotes the OTF with a misfocus of 0, the dashed line is for of 15, and the dashed-dotted line is for of 30. Notice that the vertical scale is different than that of figure 5.

  
Figure 7: Normalized full width at half maximum amplitude (FWHM) of the PSF of the cubic-pm optical/digital system with comparison to that of the standard optical system.

  
Figure 8: Simulated images of a spoke target from standard optical system (a, c, & e) and cubic-pm optical/digital system (b,d, & f). (a,b) Geometrically infocus, (c,d) mild misfocus, and (e,f) extreme misfocus.

  
Figure 9: Magnitude of the digital filter transfer function used in simulations of the cubic-pm optical/digital system.

  
Figure 10: Ratio of the Fisher information of misfocus, assuming a point object, of the standard optical system over the Fisher information of misfocus for the cubic-pm optical/digital system.



next up previous
Next: About this document Up: Extended Depth of Field Previous: References



Ed Dowski
Tue Oct 31 12:23:40 MST 1995