Stationary Phase Derivation of the Cubic-PM OTF



next up previous
Next: References Up: Extended Depth of Field Previous: Conclusion

Stationary Phase Derivation of the Cubic-PM OTF

Through the method of stationary phase applied to the ambiguity function we can find an ambiguity function, and associated phase function, that is independent of the second parameter, here called . Such ambiguity functions define incoherent optical systems insensitive to misfocus.

The ambiguity function of the general phase mask or function, given in (1), is

 

Let us assume that the non-linear function is some single-term polynomial.

 

This form of will result in a mathematically tractable solution. We can then re-write (A1) as

where

 

If the phase term varies ``fast enough'', the above integral can be approximated through the stationary point of . This is the general idea behind the method of stationary phase, first described by Lord Kelvin. Contemporary researchers have applied the method of the stationary phase to the ambiguity function. The stationary phase approximation for is given by [13][12][11]

 

where

 

From (A5) the magnitude of the ambiguity function will be independent of its second parameter when the second derivative of with respect to is independent of , or equivalently when the stationary point is linear in . In order to find the stationary point , we can begin by taking the derivative of (A6) and setting the result equal to zero. We obtain

We can show that the solution for above, as a function of , will be linear in as required if and only if . The needed mask will then have a cubic phase profile. We term this ``cubic phase modulation'', or a cubic-pm mask. This cubic-pm function has a stationary point of

 

The stationary phase approximation to the magnitude of the ambiguity function of the cubic-pm system is then

Using (A4), (A6), (A8), we can find that the phase term of this ambiguity function, from (A6), is given by

Combining both the magnitude and phase approximations we have

From (5), the resulting approximation to the OTF of the cubic-pm system is then given by

The magnitude of the approximate OTF above is independent of the misfocus parameter . The phase approximation contains two terms, however. One term is independent of misfocus, the other not. Specifically, the second of the phase terms, , is a function of mis-focus . Notice that this term is a linear phase term in . Such a term has the effect of merely shifting the location of the resulting point spread function (PSF) with large misfocus. Fortunately, this term can be controlled through the constant . Large values of , from (A2), minimize the sensitivity of the cubic-pm system to movement of the PSF with misfocus. In practice, this misfocus dependent term can be effectively controlled so as to be negligible. The final approximation for the OTF is then

It is easy to show from (A1) that . The stationary phase approximations are valid for large space-bandwidth product (SBP) functions [9][8]. The definition of a ``large'' SBP is usually accepted to be greater than 100. With the general mask of (1), the spatial extent is 2. The bandwidth of this general mask is given by its maximum instantaneous frequency. Since instantaneous frequency is the derivative of phase, the bandwidth of the general mask is

The SBP of the cubic-pm mask must then satisfy

or approximately



next up previous
Next: References Up: Extended Depth of Field Previous: Conclusion



Ed Dowski
Tue Oct 31 12:23:40 MST 1995