IAFS 1000
3 Dec 2009
Final Paper Guidelines
Hard copies of your final papers are due in your TA’s mailbox by 4:59 pm on Wednesday, December 9. Late papers will be penalized a third of a grade for each day late (e.g. a B paper submitted one day late will receive a B-.) You must also submit a copy to turnitin.com, following the instructions at <http://www.colorado.edu/history/chester/IAFS1000Turnitin.htm>. Be sure to include your last name in the file name when you upload your paper to Turnitin.
Keep in mind that you may not use internet sources for this paper, with the exception of material on the approved list posted on the course website, unless you have permission to do so from your TA. Wikipedia is not an approved source.
Your paper must have a clear argument. It must be analytical, rather than merely descriptive; in other words, it should not simply summarize an issue.
Top-notch papers will:
1) state an argument clearly on the first page. Your argument should not be obvious. In other words, another reasonable observer looking at the same evidence could come up with a different argument. The best papers will address those alternative explanations and show why your argument is superior.
2) make clear the significance of the topic. Answer the “so what?” question. Why is it worth writing a paper on this topic?
3) show how the argument is based on evidence. The sources you use must provide the foundation for your argument.
Your paper must be 10-15 pages, double spaced. Citations must be properly formatted. We suggest you use a minimum of ten sources.
We will use the following rubric in grading your paper.
Final Paper Grade Sheet
Name:
________________________________________________________________________
A paper with these characteristics . . . . . . will fall into this range
Clear, thoughtful, non-obvious argument A
Acknowledgement and analysis of alternative arguments
Excellent analysis
Excellent grammar and style
Complete, properly formatted citations
Clear argument B
Leaning towards description rather than analysis
Good grammar and style
Minor problems with citations
Lack of clear argument C
Lack of adequate analysis
Problems with grammar and style
Significant problems with citations
No argument D
Major problems with grammar and style
Major problems with sources
Lack of any identifiable organization F
________________________________________________________________________
Late penalty/length penalty (if any):
Overall grade: _______/ 100 Letter grade:
Overall impression:
For additional comments, please see margins throughout