Recommended Pre-Workshop Reading and General Bibliography:
Using Technology to Enhance Teaching/Learning
(* items are in reading packet)
General Books and Articles on Information Technology in Education
Balderston, Frederick E. 1995. Managing Today's University:
Strategies for Viability, Change and Excellence, 2nd ed. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Beattie, K., C. McNaught, S. Wills, eds. 1994. Interactive Multimedia
in University Education: Designing for Change in Teaching and Learning.
The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Boettcher, J. V., ed. 1992. 101 Success Stories of Information Technology
in Higher Education. The Joe Wyatt Challenge. New York, NY: McGraw
Hill.
Dolance, Michael G. and Donald M. Norris. 1995. Transforming
Higher Education: A Vision for Learning in the Twenty-first Century.
Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning.
Ernst, David J., Richard N. Katz, and John R. Sack. 1994. Organizational
and Technological Strategies for Higher Education in the Information Age.
Boulder, CO: CAUSE.
Hagel, John and Arthur G. Armstrong. 1997. Net gain:
Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston: Harvard
Business School Press.
* Massy,
William F. and Robert Zemsky. 1995. Using Information Technology to Enhance
Academic Productivity. EDUCOM, National Learning Infrastructure Initiative
(NLII), http://www.educom/edu/program/nlii/keydocs/massy.html.
Norris, Donald M. 1997. Revolutionary Strategy for the
Knowledge Age. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning.
*Oblinger,
D. G. and M. K. Maruyama. 1996. Distributed Learning. CAUSE
Professional Paper Series, No. 14. Boulder, CO: CAUSE. (http://www.cause.org/information-resources/ir-
library/abstracts/pub3014.html)
Reigeluth, C. M. and R. J. Garfinkle, R. J., eds. 1994. Systemic
Change in Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications,
Inc.
Rossman, Parker. 1992. The Emerging Worldwide Electronic University:
Information Age Global Higher Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
Rudenstine, Neil. L. 1997. The Internet and Education: a Close Fit.
Chronicle of Higher Education. Feb. 21, 1997.
Tapscott, Don. 1996. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the
Age of Networked Intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.
Twigg, Carol A. 1994. The
Need for a National Learning Infrastructure. Washington,
DC: EDUCOM. URL http://www.educom.edu/program/nlii/keydocs/monograph.html
Twigg, Carol A. 1996. Academic
Productivity: The Case for Instructional Software. Washington,
DC: EDUCOM. URL http://www.educom.edu/program/nlii/keydocs/broadmoor.html
Twigg, Carol A. and Diana G. Oblinger. 1997. The
Virtual University. Washington, DC: EDUCOM. URL http://www.educom.edu/nlii/VU.html
WWW and Graphics Design
McCanna, Laurie. 1996. Creating Great Web Graphics. New York:
MIS Press.
While I don’t necessarily embrace all of McCanna’s ideas on design,
she offers useful tips on achieving clear, crisp graphics at low screen
resolutions and with small file sizes. There is also an accompanying
web site.
Siegel, David. 1996. Creating Killer
Web Sites: The Art of Third-Generation Site Design. Indianapolis,
IN: Hayden Books.
Tufte, E. R. 1990. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics
Press.
A beautiful book, filled with illustrations, dealing with general principles
of visual design. "It is not how much information there is, but rather
how effectively it is arranged." p. 50.
Educational Multimedia Design and Evaluation
*Alexander, Shirley and John G. Hedberg.
1994. Evaluating technology-based learning: Which model? Chapter in
Interactive Multimedia in University Education: Designing for Change In
Teaching and Learning, ed. K. Beattie, C. McNaught, and S. Wills. The
Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
*Cates, W. M. 1992. Fifteen principles
for designing more effective instructional hypermedia multimedia products.
Educational Technology (December): 5-11.
Frechtling, Joy and Laure Sharp, ed. 1997. User-Friendly
Handbook for Mixed Method Evaluations. Arlington, VA: National
Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division
of Research, Evaluation and Communication, NSF Publication NSF 97-153.
Johnson, N. 1994. How to Digitize Video. New York: John Wiley
& Sons, Inc. (With CD-ROM)
Designed for experienced computer users interested in getting video
in and out of Microsoft Windows- based PCs and Apple Macintoshes. Covers
the production of digital videos, the equipment needed, and how to avoid
costly errors.
*Krygier, J.B., Catherine Reeves, David DiBiase,
Jason Cupp. 1997. Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Multimedia Resources
for Geography and Earth Science Education. Journal of Geography in Higher
Education. 21(1): 17-39.
McLachlan, Karen. WWW
CyberGuide Ratings for Content Evaluation. http://www.cyberbee.com/guide1.html.
McLachlan, Karen. WWW
CyberGuide Ratings for Web Site Evaluation. http://www.cyberbee.com/guide2.html.
Designed for use by teachers or students, these rating sheets assess
content and design seperately but do so within seven categories: speed,
first impression, ease of navigation, use of graphics/sound/video, content/information,
currency/last date revised, and availability of further information.
Park, I. and M. Hannafin. 1993. Empirically-based guidelines for the design
of interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development
41 (3): 63-85.
Suggests ways to ground integration of technology in theory and research.
Organizes research and theory into a matrix. Components of the matrix are
psychological, pedagogical and technological; each of these are divided
into general, component, and primary. The authors distill 20 empirical
principles with related implications for multimedia.
Stevens, Floraline, Frances Lawrenz, Laure Sharp, and Joy Frechtling.
1993. User-Friendly
Handbook for Project Evaluations. Arlington, VA: National Science
Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Division of
Research, Evaluation and Communication, NSF Publication NSF 93-152.
http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/EHR/RED/EVAL/handbook/handbook.htm
Weiss, E. 1994. Making Computers People-Literate. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
This book "is about what you can do to make computers people-literate,
by identifying and redesigning the user interface flaws that get in the
way of performance." Includes detailed checklists and a complete case study.
Multimedia Law and Other Legal Issues
Brinson, J. D. and M. F. Radcliffe. 1994. Multimedia law handbook:
A practical guide for developers and publishers. Menlo Park, CA: Ladera
Press.
Provides a basic understanding of the legal issues involved in developing
and distributing multimedia works, including contracts, licenses, intellectual
property rights, and fundamentals of copyright, patent, trademark, and
trade secret law. The appendix includes sample contract forms, model releases,
and listing of content sources.
Roberts, Michael M. 1995. What
is fair about fair use? Educom Review 30(2): 12-13. (http://www.educom.edu/web/pubs/review/reviewArticles/30212.html)
*Educational Multimedia Fair Use Guidelines
Development Committee. 1996. Fair
Use Guidelines for Educational Multimedia. http://www.indiana.edu/~mediares/mmfairuse.htm.
Steinbach, Sheldon E. 1998. The Hidden Legal Traps in Distance-Learning
Programs. Chronicle of Higher Education 44 (22) (6 February):
A52.
General Issues in Instructional Design, Curriculum Development, and
Geography in Higher Education
Alexander, Jane and Marsha Tate. “The
Web as a Research Tool: Evaluation Techniques.” http://www.science.widener.edu/~withers/evaluout.htm.
published as “Teaching Critical Evaluation Skills for World Wide Web Resources,”
Computers in Libraries. Nov/Dec 1996: 49-55.
The co-authors describe the five traditional print evaluation criteria
(accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage) and adapt these
for use in assessing World Wide Web sites as sources of information. Designed
to inform teachers, librarians, and others about the importance of and
information to include in evaluation. Their site includes a checklist for
evaluating an informational web page which is appropriate for use by students.
Also, a bibliography lists printed and web resources to consult for more
information on evaluation.
Brien, R. and N. Eastmond. 1994. Cognitive Science and Instruction.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Educational Technology Publications.
Boud David, Jeffrey Dunn, Elizabeth Hegarty-Hazel 1986 Teaching in
Laboratories. Guildford, Surrey: Society for Research into Higher Education
& NFER-Nelson
Chickering, Arthur W. and Zelda F. Gamson, eds. 1991. Applying the
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 47.
*Chickering, Arthur W. and Zelda F. Gamson.
1991. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. In
Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education,
ed. Arthur W. Chickering and Zelda F. Gamson, 63-69. Jossey-Bass. New Directions
for Teaching and Learning, No. 47.
English, Fenwick W. 1992. Deciding What to Teach and Test: Developing,
Aligning, and Auditing the Curriculum. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press,
Inc.
Gagné, Robert M. 1977. The Conditions of Learning, 3rd
ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Geography Education Standards Project. 1994. Geography for Life:
National Geography Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic
Society.
Gentry, C.G. 1994. Introduction to Instructional Development: Process
and Technique. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Gold, John R., Alan Jenkins, Roger Lee, Janice Monk, Judith Riley, Ifan
Shepherd, and David Unwin. 1991. Teaching Geography in Higher Education:
A Manual of Good Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hannafin, M.J. and K.L. Peck. 1988. The Design, Development, and
Evaluation of Instructional Software. New York: Macmillan.
*Hill, A.D. 1995. Geography standards,
instruction and competencies for the new world of work. Geographical
Education 8(3): 47-49.
Jonassen, D. H. 1994. Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design
model. Educational Technology (April): 34-37.
McKeachie, Wilbert J. 1986. Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning
College Teacher, 8th ed. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
Menges, Robert J. and Marilla D. Svinicki, eds. 1991. College Teaching:
From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. New Directions
for Teaching and Learning, No. 45.
*Menges, Robert J. 1994. Teaching in the
Age of Electronic Information. pp. 183-193. Chapter 19 in McKeachie, Wilbert
J. Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University
Teachers. 9th. ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co.
*Moser, Susanne and Susan Hanson. 1996.
Notes on Active Pedagogy: A Supplement to the Active Learning Modules.
Washington, D.C.: Association of American Geographers.
Rediscovering Geography Committee, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources,
Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources, National Research
Council. 1997. Rediscovering Geography: New Relevance for Science and
Society. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
SDSU/Pacific Bell Fellows Applications Design Team/Wired Learning. Application
Evaluation Rubric. http://www.kn.pacbell.com/wired/bluewebn/rubric.html
Useful for teachers and students, the site considers three key areas,
the format, the content, and the “learner process.”
Seels, Barbara B. Instructional Design Fundamentals: A Reconsideration.
Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey, 1995.
Siegel, M. A. and G. A. Sousa. 1994. Inventing the virtual textbook:
Changing the nature of schooling. Educational Technology (September):
49-54.
See especially old and new role models of teacher, student, content.
Stoltman, Joseph P. 1990. The Evaluation of the FIPSE Project in Geography.
Chapter in Ruth I. Shirey and Joseph W. Bencloski, eds. The Introductory
Course in Geography for the Preservice Teacher. Washington, D.C.: Association
of American Geographers.
Sweeters, W. 1994. Multimedia electronic tools for learning. Educational
Technology (May/June): 47- 51.
Describes popular electronic tools for learning and how they function
as part of a learning system. Uses Gagne's "Events of Instruction" to define
necessary functions of a learning system.
Multimedia in the Classroom
*Darby, J. 1994. Multimedia: So much promise--so
little progress. Chapter in Interactive Multimedia in University Education:
Designing for Change In Teaching and Learning, ed. K. Beattie, C. McNaught,
and S. Wills. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Internet and E-mail in the Classroom
Bailey, Elaine K. and Morton Cotler. 1994. Teaching via the Internet.
Communication Education 43 (2): 184-93.
One of several articles in a special issue of Communication Education
entitled "The Internet: The National Information Infrastructure." This
article was singled out because it is a catalog of innovative ideas for
using the Internet to teach college courses. Suggestions run the gamut
from giving students feedback on-line, to delivering electronic lectures,
to teaching entire courses on-line. Other articles of interest in this
collection include "Electronic Discussion Groups" and "Benefits of Computer-Mediated
Communication in College Courses."
Hall, Barbara Welling. 1993. Using E-mail to Enhance Class Participation.
PS: Political Science and Politics 26 (4): 757-761.
Hall describes her use of e-mail to encourage full participation from
all theory at Earlham College. She found that a class-access only newsgroup
did encourage full participation members of a class in feminist international
relations and also provided a forum for discussion of topics students considered
too contentious for full investigation in-class, e. g. women and the military
draft.
Lowry, May and others. 1994. Electronic Discussion Groups: Using E-mail
as an Instructional Strategy. TechTrends. 39 (2): 22-24.
This is one of several articles from a special issue of TechTrends
entitled "The E-Mail Revolution". Other articles worth a look include "Ethics
and Electronic Mail" and "School/University Collaboration Via E- Mail."
This article was singled out because it reports on the lessons learned
from using an electronic discussion group in a graduate educational psychology
course at the University of Colorado at Denver. According to the authors,
instructors wishing to use electronic discussion groups need to provide
students training and technical assistance for using e-mail, deal with
on-line discussion groups as they would in- class discussion groups, realize
that students will use and appreciate the electronic forum, and collect
information on how electronic discussions aid or hinder learning.
Norman, Kent L. and Leslie E. Carter. 1994. An Evaluation of the Electronic
Classroom: The AT& T Teaching Theater at the University of Maryland.
Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal 2 (1): 22-39.
This article is divided into two sections. The first describes the
AT& T Teaching theater and the computer and telecommunications hardware/software
the theater contains. The second half is an initial, qualitative assessment
of the theater's use. The biggest problems were the students' and faculty's
unfamiliarity with computers and the inability (for reasons explained in
the article) of students to store information on disks or print out assignments
in the theater. The article also contains a brief section admonishing teachers
who would use multimedia in the classroom to make everything as "normal"
as possible -- i. e., ""tests should look like tests".
Onkerson, Ann and Dru Mogge, eds. 1994. Gateways, Gatekeepers, and Roles
in the Information Omniverse: Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Scholarly
Publishing on the Electronic Networks. Washington, DC: Association
of Research Libraries, Office of Scientific and Academic Publishing.
Poling, Don J. 1994. E-mail as an effective teaching supplement.
Educational Technology 34 (5): 53- 55.
Poling describes his extensive use of Clemson's e-mail system to field
student questions, counsel students, post class assignments, make general
class assignments, give occasional quizzes, and post grades. He balances
his account with brief discussions of some of the downsides to extensive
reliance on e-mail but concludes that the benefits outweigh the liabilities.
*Ryan, Mary Gene. 1996. Using e-mail as an
evaluation tool. Innovation Abstracts. 17 (20). Austin, TX: The
National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development (NISOD), Department
of Curriculum and Instruction, The University of Texas at Austin.
Collaborative Learning
Bruffee, Kenneth A. 1993. Collaborative Learning: Higher Education,
Interdependence and the Authority of Knowledge. Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
O'Malley, Claire, ed. 1994. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
The articles in this book were originally presented at the 1989 NATO
Advanced Research Workshop on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning.
Although some of the work is out of date, the collection is valuable for
its emphasis on collaborative distance education through use of telecommunications
technologies. More exactly, the papers address the following topics: theoretical
and empirical work on peer interaction and learning; research on computer-supported
collaborative work; cognitive models of collaborative interaction; computer
networks and computer-mediated communication; and, the design of systems
to support real-time collaborative learning. Articles of interest include:
"Collaborative Problem Solving with Hypercard"; "Computer Support for the
Collaborative Learning of Physics"; "Technology's Role in Restructuring
for Collaborative Learning"; and, "Issues in Computer Supported Collaborative
Learning."
Wild, Rosemary H. and Maryanne Winniford. 1993. Remote collaboration among
students using electronic mail." Computers and Education 21 (3):
193-203.
Students who were enrolled in similar quantitative decision-making
course at the University of Hawaii and Southern Methodist University had
to complete an assignment which required use of e-mail to reach collaborative
decisions. According to the authors of this article, this assignment was
valuable because it required students to practice many of the skills they
will need in the working world; the ability to make quality group decisions
and the ability to use electronic communication to overcome difficulties
imposed by time and distance. The article concludes with suggestions for
using remote collaboration strategies in non-business classes.
Web Sites
CAUSE has hundreds of papers on
distance learning, distributed learning, technology in classrooms, etc.
CoverWeb:
Tenure and Technology: New Values, New Guidelines
Creating Killer Web Sites
Web Design
Research and Critical
Thinking
a list of links to sites related to the following topics: concept mapping,
web site evaluation, research skills and tools, search tools and how to
use them, and critical thinking and the web. It is part of the “History/Social
Studies Web Site for K-12 Teachers” homepage: http://www.execpc.com/~dboals/boals.html.
Created 15 May 1997 by Shannon Crum
Last updated 20 February 1998. KEF.