| GEOG
5251:
Fluvial Geomorphology
Lecture: MWF 2:00-2:50 PM Lab: Th 1:00-3:50 PM Instructor: John
Pitlick
Office: Guggenheim 315 Office Hours: M 3:00-5:00 PM E-mail: pitlick@colorado.edu |
![]() |
This course emphasizes
fluvial-hydraulic processes in
rivers. In order to understand how
rivers work, and what makes one river different from another, we must
first
know something about the water and sediment supply. We then ask,
how do
channels adjust in space or time to convey the water and sediment
supplied? If we knew these quantities, and if channels acted like
pipes
with rigid walls, then the problem of predicting flow and sediment
transport
through the system would be easy. But rarely do we know the water
and
sediment supply, and it's not often that a river acts like a pipe; in
fact,
much of the river network consists of "alluvial" channels that are
free to adjust their width and depth.
There are thus two parts to this problem: One is to understand
interactions between the flow and the sediment supplied to the channel,
and the
other is to understand how the channel adjusts to carry both water and
sediment, not always in the same proportion. Topics to be covered
are as follows:
1.
Regional
relations for runoff
and sediment yield
2.
Basic fluid
mechanics and
flow in natural channels
3.
Sediment
transport
4.
Hydraulic
geometry
5.
Channel
morphology
(development of bars; braided & meandering rivers)
6.
Sediment
sorting and
development of the longitudinal profile
7.
Landscape
evolution
Knighton, D.,
1998, Fluvial Forms and Processes, Arnold, New York, 383 pp.
Dingman, S.L.,
1984, Fluvial Hydrology, W.H.
Freeman, New York, 383 pp.
1. Projects:
The goal of the laboratory
portion of the course is to develop analytical tools for addressing
theoretical
or practical problems in fluvial geomorphology. I
will walk you through a series of projects, showing
you how to take different types of measurements and analyze the data,
and you
will then summarize the results in a series of short (5-page) reports. The projects will involve a mix of
internet-based data retrieval and analysis, hands-on field trips
emphasizing sampling and measurement techniques, and laboratory
experiments at the USGS
Geomorphology and Sediment Transport Laboratory in
Golden, CO.
2.
Readings: Periodically I
will ask you to read a group of papers, and summarize your thoughts in
a 3-page
critique. The purpose of the written critiques is to get you to (a)
read the
literature, (b) become critical of other people's work, and (c) learn
to write
concisely. We will discuss the papers as a group when the time
arises.
![]() NF Toutle
River, near Mt. St. Helens, WA
|
![]() Colorado River, near Moab, UT (photo by
Bob Cress)
|
![]() Flume at St. Anthony Falls Lab |
![]() Hoffstad Creek, near Mt. St. Helens, WA |
GEOG 5251 Fluvial Geomorphology Reading List
1. Surface-water
Hydrology and Sediment Yield
Knighton,
Chapt. 3, pp. 75-95
Milliman,
J.D. and Syvitski, J.P.M., 1992, Geomorphic/tectonic control of
sediment
discharge to the ocean: The importance of small mountain rivers, J.
Geol., 100, 525-544.
Aalto,
R., Dunne, T., and Guyot, J.L., 2006, Geomorphic controls on Andean
denudation
rates: J. Geol., 114, 85-99.
Wolman,
M.G. and Miller, J.P., 1960. Magnitude and frequency of forces in
geomorphic
processes, J. Geol., 68, 54-74.
2. Fluid
Mechanics and Open Channel Flow
Handouts
from Dingman, pp. 95-120 and pp. 254-270; see also Knighton, Chapt. 4,
pp.
96-106
Sime, L. C., R. I.
Ferguson, and M. Church, 2007, Estimating shear stress from moving boat
acoustic Doppler velocity measurements in a large gravel bed river,
Water
Resour. Res., 43, W03418, doi:10.1029/2006WR005069.
Ferguson,
R., and M. Church 2009, A critical perspective on 1-D modeling of river
processes: Gravel load and aggradation in lower Fraser River, Water
Resour.
Res., 45, W11424, doi:10.1029/2009WR007740
Other papers of
interest:
Nelson,
J.M., J.P. Bennett, and S.M. Wiele, 2003, Flow and sediment-transport
modeling,
in Tools
in Fluvial
Geomorphology, edited by G.M. Kondolf and H. Piegay, pp. 539-576,
John
Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Wiberg,
P.L. and J.D. Smith, 1991, Velocity distribution and bed roughness in
high-gradient streams, Water Resour. Res., 5, 825-838.
3. Initiation of Motion and
Sediment
Transport
Knighton,
Chapt. 3, pp. 107-140 (skim)
Parker,
G., Klingeman, P.C. and Mclean, D.G., 1982. Bed load and size
distribution in
paved gravel-bed streams, ASCE J. Hydraul. Div., 108 (HY4), 544-571 (read
in
preparation for lab exercise)
Wilcock,
P.R. and B.W. McArdell, 1993, Surface-based fractional transport rates:
Mobilization thresholds and partial transport of a sand and gravel
sediment,
Water Resour. Res., 29, 1297-1312.
Mueller,
E.R., J. Pitlick, and J.M. Nelson, 2005, Variation in the reference
Shields
stress for bed load transport in gravel-bed streams and rivers, Water
Resour.
Res., 41, W04006, doi:10.1029/2004WR003692
Other papers of
interest:
Wiberg,
P.L. and Smith, J.D., 1987. Calculations of the critical shear stress
for
motion of uniform and heterogeneous sediments, Water Resour. Res., 23, 1471-1480.
Wathen,
S. J., R. I. Ferguson, T. B. Hoey, and A. Werritty, 1995, Unequal
mobility of
gravel and sand in weakly bimodal river sediments, Water Resour. Res.,
31,
2087–2096.
4. Hydraulic
Geometry
Knighton,
pp. 167-187
Parker,
G., 1979, Hydraulic geometry of active
gravel rivers ASCE
J.
Hydraul. Div.,
105(HY9), 1185-1201
Pizzuto,
J.E., 1992, The morphology of graded gravel rivers- a network
perspective,
Geomorphology, 5, 457-475.
Pitlick,
J. and R. Cress, 2002, Longitudinal trends in the channel
characteristics of a
large gravel-bed river, Water Resour. Res., 38(10),
1216, doi:10.1029/2001WR000898
Other papers of
interest:
Ferguson,
R., 1986, Hydraulics and hydraulic geometry, Prog. Phys. Geog., 10,
1-31.
Pizzuto,
J.E., 1994, Channel adjustments to changing discharges, Powder River,
Montana,
Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 106,
1494-1501.
Parker,
G., P. R. Wilcock, C. Paola, W. E. Dietrich, and J. Pitlick, 2007,
Physical
basis for quasi-universal relations describing bankfull hydraulic
geometry of
single-thread gravel bed rivers, J. Geophys. Res., 112, F04005,
doi:10.1029/2006JF000549.
5. Meandering
and Braided Rivers; Floodplains
Knighton,
pp. 193-236
Dietrich,
W.E. and Smith, J.D., 1983. Influence of the point bar on flow through
curved
channels, Water Resour. Res., 19,
1173-1192.
Ashmore P.,
E. Sauks, 2006, Prediction of discharge from
water surface width in a braided river with implications for
at-a-station
hydraulic geometry, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03406,
doi:10.1029/2005WR003993.
Lauer,
J. W., and G. Parker, 2008, Modeling framework for sediment deposition,
storage, and evacuation in the floodplain of a meandering river:
Application to
the Clark Fork River, Montana, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08404,
doi:10.1029/2006WR005529.
Other papers of
interest:
Everitt,
B.L., 1968. Use of the Cottonwood in an investigation of the recent
history of
a floodplain, Am. J. Sci., 266,
417-439.
Church,
M., Channel morphology and typology, in The Rivers Handbook:
Hydrological and
Ecological Principles, edited by P. Calow and G. Petts, 126-143,
Blackwell,
Oxford, 1992.
Wolman,
M.G. and Leopold, L.B., 1957. River flood plains: some observations on
their
formation, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 282-C, 89-109.
6. Longitudinal
profile, downstream fining, & base level
Knighton,
pp. 242-260
Bradley,
W.C., Fahnestock, R.K., and Rowekamp, E.T., 1972. Coarse sediment
transport by
flood flows on the Knik River, Alaska, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 83,
1261-84.
Ferguson,
R.I., and Wathen, S.J., 1998, Tracer pebble movement along a concave
river
profile: Virtual velocity in relation to grain size and shear stress,
Water
Resour. Res., 34, 2031-2038.
Sklar,
L. S., W. E. Dietrich, E. Foufoula-Georgiou, B. Lashermes, and D.
Bellugi,
2006, Do gravel bed river size distributions record channel network
structure?,
Water Resour. Res., 42, W06D18, doi:10.1029/2006WR005035.
Other papers of
interest:
Bradley,
W.C., 1970. Effect of weathering on abrasion of granitic gravel,
Colorado River
(Texas), Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer.,
81, 61-80.
Hack,
J.T., 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and
Maryland,
U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 294-B, 94 pp.
Gasparini,
N.M., G.E. Tucker, and R.L. Bras, 2004, Network-scale dynamics of grain
size
sorting: Implications for downstream fining, stream profile concavity,
and drainage
basin morphology, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 29,
401-421.
7. Landscape
evolution and Long-term Denudation
Knighton, pp. 42-50
Sklar, L. S.,
and W. E. Dietrich, 2004, A mechanistic model
for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load, Water Resour.
Res., 40,
W06301, doi:10.1029/2003WR002496.
Schaller,
M., F. von Blanckenburg, N. Hovius and P.W. Kubik, 2001,
Large-scale
erosion rates from in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides in European
river
sediments, Earth and Planetary Science
Letters, 188,
441-458
Tucker,
G.E., 2004, Drainage basin sensitivity
to tectonic and
climatic
forcing: Implications of a stochastic model for the role of entrainment
and
erosion thresholds, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms,
29, 185-205.
Other papers of
interest:
Howard,
A.D., 1994, A detachment-limited model of drainage basin evolution,
Water
Resour. Res., 30, 2261-2285.
Molnar,
P. and England, P., 1990, Late Cenozoic uplift of mountain ranges and
global
climate change- chicken or egg, Nature,
346, 29-34.
Pinet,
P. and Souriau, M., 1987, Continental erosion and large-scale relief,
Tectonics, 7, 563-582.
Summerfield,
M.A. and N.J. Hulton, 1994, Natural controls of fluvial denudation
rates in
major world drainage basins, J. Geophys. Res., 99,
B7, 13,871-13,883.