Note: This file contains only the text of the module titled Cartographic Communication. You may use this file, but please credit its authors: Kenneth E. Foote and Shannon Crum, The Geographer's Craft Project, The University of Texas at Austin. A full hypertext version of this file, including illustrations, is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.utexas.edu/depts/grg/gcraft/notes/cartocom_f.html.

1. The Value of Maps

Maps are perhaps as fundamental to society as language and the written word. They are the preeminent means of recording and communicating information about the location and spatial characteristics of the natural world and of society and culture. Some would say that the use of maps distinguishes geography from all other disciplines. The truth is that maps, though of special concern to geographers, are used throughout the sciences and humanities and in virtually every aspect of day-to-day life. Millions of maps are produced and used annually throughout the world by scientists, scholars, governments, and businesses to meet environmental, economic, political, and social needs. Many cartographers have reflected on the important role played by maps in society. One of the most recent statements worth considering is Denis Wood's book The Power of Maps (New York: Guilford Press, 1992).

Maps gain their value in three ways:

[Image] 1.1 As a way of recording and storing information

[Image] Location of USGS water-quality test sites in Wisconsin

[Image] 1.2 As a means of analyzing locational distributions and spatial patterns

[Image] Environmental factors affecting poverty in Africa by Christine Byer, George Mason University

[Image] 1.3 As a method of presenting information and communicating findings

[Image] The Rise and Fall of Mesoamerica by Chad Shuey, George Mason University

To realize this potential, it is useful to learn some basic principles of cartographic communication and map design. Cartography is a special type of communication that does require training. But, attention invested in learning the basics will pay off handsomely in the production of more effective maps. Sometimes people assume that such training is too highly technical to be mastered easily and forego the use of maps. This is unfortunate because maps could be used more widely in the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities for analysis and communication, particularly now that computers can be used as an aid to production. Some attention to first principles is still warranted. Apart from the following notes, you may wish to consult:

 * Cuff, David J. and Mattson, Mark T. 1982. Thematic Maps: Their Design and Production. New York: Methuen.

 * Dent, Borden D. 1985. Principles of Thematic Map Design. Reading, Mass.: Addison- Wesley Publishing Co.

 * Monmonier, Mark . 1993. Mapping it Out: Expository Cartography for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 A very readable introduction to the principles of cartography aimed particularly at students and scholars who have had little training in geography or cartography.

 * Muehrcke, Phillip C. 1986. Map Use: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation, 2nd ed. Madison, Wis.: JP Publications.

 * Robinson, Arthur H., Joel L. Morrison, Phillip C. Muehrcke, A. Jon Kimerling, and Stephen C. Guptill. 1995. Elements of Cartography, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

This is the classic textbook, recently revised to reflect the tremendous changes in cartographic production resulting from widespread adoption of computer-based techniques and GIS.

[Image

2. Cartography as Communication

One of the most useful approaches to the study of cartography is to view maps as a form of visual communication--a special-purpose language for describing spatial relationships. Although it is perhaps unwise to draw a direct analogy between cartography and language, concepts such as "grammar" and "syntax" help to explain, at least metaphorically, the sorts of decisions cartographers make as they compose maps. Cartographers seek to make use of visual resources such as color, shape and pattern to communicate information about spatial relationships. The analogy with language also helps explain why training in principles of effective cartography is so important--it allows us to communicate more effectively. Without a knowledge of some of these basic principles, the beginning cartographer is likely to be misunderstood or cause confusion.

[Image] 2.1 Cartography is closely related to graphical communication

Cartography is related to, but different from other forms of visual communication. Cartographers must pay special attention to coordinate systems, map projections, and issues of scale and direction that are in most cases of relatively little concern to other graphic designers or artists. But, because cartography is a type of graphical communication, some insights to the demands of cartography can be gleaned from the literature of graphical communication and statistical graphics. Often cartographers are faced with some of the same challenges faced by graphical designers and can learn much from their insights. As you begin to study cartographic design, you may find it useful to consult some of the standard works on graphical communication. You will find the following books particularly interesting, and maps are often the focus of discussion.

* Cleveland, William S. 1985. The Elements of Graphing Data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.

 * Schmid, Calvin F. 1983. Statistical Graphics: Design Principles and Practices. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

 * Schmid, Calvin F. and Schmid, Stanton E. 1979. Handbook of Graphic Presentation, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

 * Tufte, Edward R. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

 * Tufte, Edward R. 1990. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
 
 

[Image] 2.2 Maps are symbolic abstractions--"generalizations" or "representations"--of reality

By stressing cartography as a form of communication, it is easier to make the point that maps are really symbolic abstractions--or representations--of real world phenomena. In most cases, this means that the world represented on a map has been greatly simplified, or generalized, with symbols being used like words to stand for real things. Some of the most important decisions cartographers make in the process of cartographic design revolve around: 1) how much to simplify the situation being depicted; and 2) how to symbolize the relationships being represented.

For further discussion of these issues, you may wish to consult:

* Guelke, Leonard, Ed. 1977. The Nature of Cartographic Communication. Cartographica Monograph No. 19.

 * Robinson, Arthur H. and Petchenik, Barbara B. 1976. The Nature of Maps: Essays toward Understanding Maps and Mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 * Taylor, D.R.F., Ed. 1983. Progress in Contemporary Cartography. Volume 2: Graphic Communication and Design in Contemporary Cartography. New York: John Wiley.
 
 

3. What Is a Good Map?

If cartography is a form of communication, the measure of a good map is how well it conveys information to its readers to enlighten, convince, or persuade. Too often the pure aesthetic appeal of a map is equated with its communicational value. Aesthetic issues certainly play a role in effective cartography, but it is the issue of communication that holds the central role in cartographic design. To ask "what is a good map?" is to ask how well it communicates with its audience.

 This means that one always begins a project by considering the message to be conveyed and the audience to be addressed. This raises a series of questions that must be addresses at the start of a project:

 [Image] 3.1 What is the motive, intent, or goal of the map?
 
 

[Image] Bigfoot sightings in the Pacific Northwest by Chad Shuey, George Mason University

[Image] 3.2 Who will read the map?
 
 

[Image] 3.3 Where will the map be used?
 
  [Image] 3.4 What data is available for the composition of the map? [Image] 3.5 What resources are available in terms of both time and equipment?
 
  [Image]

4. Basic Elements of Map Composition

 As the questions of message, audience, and context are addressed, one can turn to issues relating to the form, layout, and composition of a map. In this section, we will begin by raising questions about size and proportion, about simplification, and about the general types of information that are arrayed on maps. Although symbolization is critical to map composition, it is so important a subject that it will be considered in the next section.

[Image] 4.1 The format of the final production?

[Image] 4.2 The issue of generalization, simplification, and abstraction [Image] Illustration of increasing need for generalization as the scale of a map decreases.

[Image] Illustration of need for increasing detail as the scale of a map increases.

[Image]You may wish to map one part of a larger area--one country out of a continent, or one state out of many. The amount of surrounding territory and the number of neighboring features you include will vary substantially by context. In effect, the more your audience knows, the less you have to show. Be aware, however, that adding just "a little" information, unless done wisely, can lead to confusion. Sometimes locator and index maps (see below) are used to help orient the reader to the location of the area of interest.

[Image] 4.3 Basic map elements: Information commonly needed by the map reader

ELEMENTS THAT ARE FOUND ON VIRTUALLY ALL MAPS: [Image] Direction


ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS THAT ARE SENSITIVE TO CONTEXT:

 [Image] Title

Projection Cartographer Date of production [Image] [Image]

ELEMENTS THAT ARE USED SELECTIVELY TO ASSIST EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION:

 [Image] Diagram of selectively-used elements

 Neatlines

Locator maps Inset maps Index maps -----------------------------------------------------------------

The maps of Japan shown below are part of a series of maps designed for inclusion in a book. Therefore, they are not titled -- that function will be served by captions. The maps are designed to show the location of Japan, Kyushu, and Nagasaki. Because no thematic information is included, a legend is not necessary.

The maps move from a rather large scale down to a very precise representation of Nagasaki. Because the three maps are shown together, it is not necessary to include a locator map in the map of Nagasaki. If, however, a map of Nagasaki is intended to stand alone, a locator map is absolutely necessary. Click on any of the frames to see alternate layouts for these maps. (inactive 5/17) [Image] [Image]

 4.4 Elements are balanced within the visual hierarchy and frame of the map

As one considers each map element, the cartographer must determine its importance to and priority within the overall map design. The most important elements in a given design should be featured in more prominent positions and perhaps occupy a larger area within the map frame. As a first approximation, the most important information should be featured near the top or to the left of the map. Less important and ancillary map elements can be positioned toward the bottom and right. In this way, the importance of the various map elements can be matched to the visual hierarchy of the map itself. In general terms, the importance of a given map element should be reflected in its position and the amount space it occupies on the map.

Once the elements are arranged to reflect their importance, attention can be given to their overall balance in the map frame. The idea here is to distribute the elements as evenly as possible within the map frame to avoid unnecessary crowding or, conversely, large blank areas. The cartographer can also align map elements within the frame to allow readers to more easily scan the page

[Image] 4.5 Experiment with map layouts

Experimentation is often required to achieve an effective layout. You might begin by preparing some simple sketches of you map blocking out how you will use the available space. Sketches such as this allow you to consider alternative layouts before you begin to compose the elements in detail. Sometimes computer-assisted drafting systems can be useful at this stage because of the ease with which they permit you to experiment with possible layouts.

[Image]

[Image] 4.6 There should be a defensible reason for each element placed on a map and for its composition

As you develop a design for a map, think carefully about every element--does it play an essential function, could it be simplified, does it require elaboration, is it of critical importance to reader comprehension, or only of background interest. Such questioning of every detail is important to effective map making. Everything that appears on a map should be there for a defensible reason relating to message and audience.

[Image] 4.7 Less is more

As you consider the elements of your map, it is sometimes useful to apply the adage less is more. As you work, consider ways in which you can simplify your design and make it more legible. Too much detail or too complex a layout can confuse readers and work against effective communication. Do not avoid experiments, but be sure to test them carefully with your potential readers.

[Image]

5. The Cartographer's Palette: The Semiotics of Cartography

Cartographers employ symbols to represent location, direction, distance, movement, function, process, and correlation. These features of the real world are abstracted and symbolized on maps as points, lines, and areas. A tremendous amount of practice and skill is involved in choosing effective strategies for symbolization. One of the best ways to learn about these strategies is to consider the sorts of visual resources available to the cartographer.

[Image] 5.1 The range of visual resources

As cartographers reduce the world to points, lines, and areas, they use a variety of visual resources. Jacques Bertin in his book The Semiology of Graphics (1983), inventories these resources using the categories of size, shape, value, texture or pattern, hue, orientation, and shape.

[Image]

Cartographers can apply these resources to points, lines, and areas in a variety of ways.

B. Diagram of how these resources are applied to points, lines, and areas

Each of these resources can be used individually to draw attention to map features, or they may be used in combination. Sometimes cartographers deploy several of these resources simultaneously to stress particularly important information or to improve its legibility.

C. Diagram of resources deployed in various combinations

[Image] 5.2 Strategies of symbolization

With such a range of resources available, the question arises as to what strategies to use in assigning these resources to points, lines, and areas. The strategies employed vary greatly depending on the nature of the phenomena being mapped. We distinguish among four levels of measurement in describing real-world phenomena:

A. Effective strategies for symbolizing certain data relationships:

 nominal, ordinal, interval-ratio

These resources can be used in a wide variety of ways and several may be used at once to highlight or reinforce a single relationship. Thus, for example, if only a single ordinal variable is being mapped, several visual resources may be deployed at once. If several ordinal variables are being displayed, the visual resources may have to be used more selectively.

[Image] 5.3 Typography and lettering

 Adding text to a map is one of the cartographer's most demanding tasks. The cartographer must be concerned both with the content and the form of the text, that is the wording and the way the text is displayed on the map. Indeed, the verbal content of a map is one of the most powerful communicational resources available to the cartographer. Its effective use is often the point of difference between high-quality, professional maps and less skillfully executed maps. Compare the following maps and notice how much difference lettering makes to overall readability. Pay special attention to the differences--the size of the lettering, how it is aligned, and the fonts and cases used.

Although automated systems offer a wealth of fonts and sizes, good practice dictates that these resources be used sparingly. Too many fonts (and sizes) can potentially confuse the reader. Traditionally, typographers try to use no more than four fonts or font sizes on a given page of print. Apply the same principle to your maps. Use different fonts and sizes only when you have a compelling reason to do so.

Lettering is also distinguished by case: UPPER CASE, lower case, and Mixed Case.

If you consider professionally produced maps, you find that font, size, and case are used very carefully to encode text. In effect, the text is used to group information into useful categories that reflect the theme of the map.

Special attention must be paid to the orientation of text with respect to the features being labeled. In this respect, text can be used as an important cue to different map features.

Point features--lettering "points" to feature, but try to avoid lettering across boundaries.

Linear features--lettering shows shape, but watch out for ambiguities.

Area features--lettering occupies the area. [Image]

In following these guidelines, conflicts will always emerge. On maps crowded with information it is nearly impossible to arrange all text without striking compromises among these principles. The point is to follow the guidelines as much as possible and, when conflicts do arise, consider options carefully in light of the map theme and competing cartographic elements.

The arrangement of letters can also be used to convey quite subtle distinctions. For example, in the following map, lettering pertinent the map theme is aligned with the map frame whereas lettering that describes the background features is aligned with the graticule.

Quite apart from labeling features, text is used for convey other information about the map--sources, date, methods of compilation, projection, and cartographer. This ancillary information is usually placed in a subordinate position within the frame of the map. However, the readability of your map will be improved if you position this text in relation to the major map elements. That is, your map can be composed with implicit margins and tabs that can be used as a means of alignment for subsidiary text.

[Image] 5.4 Foreground-background (figure-ground) relationships

Good cartography involves bringing the most important map information into the foreground of the reader's attention, even though other detail must be displayed in the background to make the map intelligible. Differences between the foreground and background are critical to some maps where clear distinctions must be made between certain types of features like the boundaries between land and water bodies. Cartographers employ a number of devices to make it easier for readers to distinguish between these features and to sort out a map's most important message.

The key to resolving foreground-background relationships is to use color, value, and patterning to "raise" some map features into the foreground. In some respects this is like using color, value, and patterning to produce a sort of three-dimensional effect in which certain key features appear to rise off the map's two-dimensional surface. In fact, these resources can be used to create a sort of three-dimensional visual hierarchy.

This idea can be put to practical use in a wide range of situations where the reader would otherwise have difficulty sorting out information displayed on a map.

Understanding the dynamics of foreground-background relationships can also help resolve certain ambiguities that sometimes arise in mapmaking. Consider the following example:

Depending the map and mapping system you employ, any of the options might be used either singly or in combination.

[Image] 5.5 Highlighting the theme

 The theme of your map must rise to the foreground. Now that you are aware of the cartographic resources available, you can use them to highlight the most important thematic information. This may involve using a vivid or saturated color to bring the information forward, using heavier line weights, or a contrasting, bold pattern. These resources can, of course, be used in combination.

Further Reading

Bertin, Jacque. 1983. Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Translated by W.J. Berg. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Board, C. and Taylor, R.M. 1985. Perception and maps: Human factors in map design and interpretation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series 2: 19-36.

Cleveland, William S. and McGill, Robert. 1985. Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data. Science 229: 828-833.

[Image]

6. Issues of Statistical Generalization

[Image] 6.1 The importance of attending to issues of statistical generalization

When maps are used to display statistical information, cartographers take special care to depict as accurately as possible the underlying distribution of data. This is a difficult task because the whole point of displaying the data cartographically is to generalize the data to facilitate the search for spatial patterns. But by generalizing and simplifying the data, the cartographer may just as easily obscure subtle gradations in the underlying distribution. Therefore, in mapping statistical data, the cartographer is always trying to strike a balance between remaining true to the underlying data distribution and generalizing the data sufficiently to reveal intrinsic spatial patterns.

Although these issues of statistical generalization can be applied to data that is to be symbolized by points, lines, and areas, this discussion will be developed around the mapping of areas in choropleth maps. This is in part because choropleth maps are used so widely, but also because they are difficult to execute effectively. This is because choropleth maps have an inherent weakness--they involve the aggregation of data within areal units that do not correspond exactly with the underlying spatial distribution of data. By focusing on choropleth mapping in the following examples, some of these weaknesses can be revealed and discussed.

[Image] 6.2 What a difference this issue makes to maps

 To understand the importance of this issue, it is useful to examine a set of maps developed from the same dataset using different numbers of categories and different ranging methods.

[Image] 6.3 Exploring your data and its "shape"

You should get to know the shape of any statistical distribution you plan to map. Plot a scattergram or histogram of the data and employ basic descriptive statistics to explore its distribution. Many automated mapping programs provide options which graph data and will automatically calculate descriptive statistics like mean, mode, median, range, and standard deviation. Take advantage of these options explore your data.

Diagrams of different shapes:

[Image]

 Be aware also that mathematical transformations change the shape of a distribution--implying that the ranging method must change also. Shown below is a histogram of population growth of Texas counties between 1980 and 1990. Note that the distribution is J-shaped with a pronounced peak on the left--meaning most Texas counties grew very little in this decade. However, if this same data is represented as a percentage of 1980 population, the histogram looks very different--because even the smallest counties did grow substantially in proportion to their 1980 population. Two histograms here.

 [Image] 6.4 Commonly employed ranging methods for assigning cutpoints

 The articles listed below by Michael Coulson (1987), Ian Evans (1977), and George Jenks (1963) provide detailed overviews of the ranging methods commonly employed by cartographers as well as necessary computational algorithms. It is essential that you consult these articles as soon as possible because they cover many more techniques than can be discussed here, and in far greater detail. The following discussion will simply highlight a few of the methods that many computer systems provide as "defaults."

In generalizing statistical distributions, cartographers use the term "cutpoint" to refer to the boundaries between categories. All the following methods pertain to the calculation or assignment of these cutpoints. Remember, all systems of classification depend upon the use of "exhaustive" and "mutually exclusive" categories. Exhaustive means that the categories classify all values of a given data range--no values within that range are omitted from the classification system. Mutually exclusive means that any given observation can be placed in one and only one category--data categories cannot overlap. Please be sure, if you are using an automated mapping system, that the the system does not assign overlapping cutpoints automatically when it creates the map legend.

[Image] 6.5 Symbolizing the Category Ranges

Once you have divided your data into categories, you must use the visual resources at your disposal to symbolize them on the map. Because your interval-ratio data have now been ordered into ordinal categories, the idea is to use color, value, or pattern to create a visual index between category symbols and their value. You can order the symbols using:

[Image]

[Image] 6.6 Statistical annotations are needed for some complex datasets

 In some situations, you might find it useful to add statistical annotations to your map. These may indicate to the reader the nature of the statistical distribution being displayed and the means by which it was classified. Sometimes it is sufficient to note some of the descriptive statistics for a distribution, such as its range, mean, median, and mode. At other times, you may wish to add bar graphs, scattergrams, or other statistical diagrams.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading

Coulson, Michael R.C. 1987. In the matter of class intervals for choropleth maps: With particular reference to the work of George F. Jenks. Cartographica 24 (2): 16-39.

Evans, Ian S. 1977. The selection of class intervals. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers New Series 2: 98-124.

Jenks, George F. 1963. Generalization in statistical mapping. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 53: 15-26.

Jenks, George F. and Duane S. Knos. 1961. The Use of Shading Patterns in Graded Series. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 51: 316-334.

[Image]

7. Problems of Realizing Ideals with Computer Systems

Mapping software provides cartographers with the same sorts of advantages that text-processing software offers writers. Computers assist cartographers with the accurate drafting that has traditionally required tremendous manual skill, patience, and training. They also make it far easier to revise maps, to experiment with layout, composition, and symbolization, and to duplicate information from one map to another when producing series of maps. Still, the effective use of automated systems requires that the cartographer be just as familiar with the strengths and limitations of each automated system as with principles of effective cartography. The point is that computers can be used to produce poor maps as readily as good maps and the responsibility to know the difference rests with the cartographer. Perhaps the thought to keep in mind is that computers don't make good or bad maps, cartographers do.

In turning to the use of computer systems, one should consider a number of related issues:

[Image] 7.1 Systems vary greatly in their strengths and weaknesses: Be aware of both

Most software systems are customized to meet the demands of specific mapping tasks. They are intended to do one or two things very well--perhaps demographic or contour mapping--and are not so good when deployed outside their domain. By acquainting yourself with a system's raison d'être you will also be able to surmise potential limitations. More importantly, do not assume that all your mapping needs will be subsumed by a single software system. It is common practice to use a variety of systems to produce even individual maps. Some computer-assisted drafting packages make it very easy to create precise base maps, but these base maps will be transfered to other graphics or drawing programs to add shading or lettering. Contour mapping and terrain modeling software may offer very advanced features for surface modeling, but limited capabilities for text, annotations, and shading; these can be added with other systems. These days it is relatively easily to move digital maps and graphics from one software system to other so as to capture the virtues of each and avoid their deficiencies.

[Image] 7.2 Consider availability of needed functions and ease of use

In selecting software it is often easy to distracted by "bells-and-whistles" -- features that promise the potential of extra "pizzazz"-- such as hundreds of fonts or millions of colors. These extra capabilities can be nice to have, but it is essential to keep one's eye on a couple of critical issues. First, how well will the system perform the functions that you use most often, perhaps on a daily basis? Extra features can be useful, but they are of little concern if you only intend to use them once a year. Second, how easy will it be learn the system well enough to incorporate it in your work? This is more than asking whether the system comes with tutorials and instructional materials. Such materials are of course important, but for every extra feature a system offers, time is added to the learning process. Even the rudimentary drawing packages provided free on many computer systems can produce exceptional maps, and they are very easy to learn. Some advanced systems for computer-assisted drafting and geographic information systems can produce maps of equal or better quality, but require weeks or months to master. Do not feel you need to acquire more "power" than you need right now. Software changes so rapidly that you may be investing in capabilities that will be surpassed before you need them.

[Image] 7.3 Be aware of the problems of designing for particular output devices

Be aware that the destination in map production is particular a output device: a screen, or pen, inkjet, thermal, and electrostatic plotters These devices vary greatly in their ability to depict linework, symbols, colors, and so forth. Cartographers have had to wait decades for the quality of low-cost, easy-to-use output devices to catch up with the capabilities of computers and mapping software. But such equipment is now available offering excellent resolution and color in A and B formats for less than $500. Still, what you see on the screen may not be exactly what the printer produces--colors, patterns, and lineweights may vary. You must design your map to the characteristics of the final output device. It is no use claiming that "it looked good on the screen." It is the final map that matters and experimentation with settings is a key to understanding how output devices vary in their representation of your map.

[Image] 7.4 Experimentation and multiple iterations are often required

Computer systems are able to assume some of the more onerous drafting tasks associated with map production, but that does not mean that you will produce an effective map the first time around. In working with automated systems, patience is a virtue. Time must be set aside to learn the system and its options. Once a person is familiar with the capabilities of system, map production will speed up, but not necessarily immediately. One has to experiment with settings through multiple iterations of a map. Patient, systematic experimentation with options is vital.

[Image] 7.5 Never trust defaults

The single most important rule in using automated systems is: Never trust defaults. Without your careful guidance, most systems use "default" settings designed, perhaps, to fit the needs of an "average" user or simply to get you started. These settings should always be questioned from the standpoint of your cartographic goals. Unquestioned, these settings may lead to ineffective or even misleading maps. Many of these settings are, initially, very useful because they will help users find their way around the software system. For example, some systems provide automatic options for titling, legends, shading, and symbology. In some cases, these setting may work for your project. It is more likely that you will need to change them. Learn the options available on your system, and do not feel obliged to use the standard settings simply because they are more convenient. Again, remember, computers don't make good or bad maps, cartographers do.

[Image] default map___[Image]same map, better format

Additional discusion of many of these points is included in an article by Kenneth E. Foote, 1992. Mapping the past: A survey of microcomputer cartography. Historical Methods 25: 121-131.

[Image]

8. Into the Future

Computer systems are certainly changing the way cartographers produce maps. At the same time they are also raising some interesting conceptual and intellectual challenges for the future.

[Image] 8.1 Toward the virtual map

New systems allow computers to simulate and model reality by using visual and auditory cues in three dimensions. These same systems might be used to create virtual maps in which users can traverse and study real and simulated environments and landscapes. At issue here is not just how these systems might be developed and employed, but also how they crosscut cartography's core concern of abstracting, simplifying and symbolizing real-world phenomena and relationships. Cartography is a process of interpretation and representation in which the map maker draws attention to critical relationships and patterns. The question is really how can this interpretive and representational task be carried forward into in virtual reality? How will cartographers be employed in cyberspace?

[Image] 8.2 Animation and other new dimensions

Mapping systems allow cartographers to draft as easily in three dimensions as two. Furthermore, many mapping and drafting systems are clones or close cousins of those used for animation. Such capabilities present cartographers with interesting opportunities to model temporal relationships, reconstruct past environments, or simulate complex processes. Could historical geographers reconstruct past environments in three dimensions or ecologists animate processes of landscape transformation? Tremendous innovation seems arrayed along the horizons of cartography.

[Image] NAISMap, the National Atlas of Canada via a WWW-based GIS

[Image] Multi-scale maps developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory

Last revised December 1995. KEF and SC.