Colorado Data Commons/CitizenAtlas Project
Name:
Grade:
Part 1) Creating the map(s) in Google Maps (40 points)
1) Have Google Maps been used effectively to display information
about the Children's Corridor?
2) What features of Google Maps have been used to create the maps
and are these used effectively?
3) As appropriate, has the data been classified and symbolized
effectively?
NOTES:
Part 2) Presentation in the Web
(40 points)
1) Does the web site work? That is:
- Is the site clearly and
concisely organized and easy to navigate?
- Are supporting pages well
organized and easy to navigate?
- Do the pages and page
organization support the narrative structure of the site?
- Do all pages and links
work--broken links, images, etc.?
- Do pages contain formatting
flaws?
- If included, are advanced
formatting options (tables, frames, iframes, JavaScript,
etc.) used effectively?
- Appropriate use of visual
hierarchy?
2) Does the website provide a clear overview of its purpose or
rationale?
3) As appropriate, are principles of narrative visualization and
digital storytelling employed in the design of the web site?
NOTES:
Part 3) Looking for Patterns in
the Data (20 points)
1) Where and why was the data acquired?
2) As appropriate, was the data processed or analyzed in any ways
that need to be explained?
3) How does the data illustrate a characteristic of the Children's
Corridor that compares or contrasts with other parts of Denver?
4) Does the conclusion summarize the knowledge gained
investigating the research topic?
5) Does the report contain a clear introduction including a thesis
statement, and is attention paid to grammar and logical sentence
structure?
NOTES:
Created 2011.11.6.. k.foote@colorado.edu