Professor Riosmena's research looks at how demographic processes are associated with the spatial and social mobility, well-being, and development in Latin American societies and immigrant communities from said region in the United States. His main research areas are immigrant health throughout different stages of the migration process and the role of U.S. immigration policy and social, economic, and environmental conditions in sending communities on the migration dynamics between Latin America and the United States.
During the past year I continued to do research on issues related to immigration from Latin America. Some of the most interesting issues I looked at relate to the effects and consequences of immigration policies in the migration dynamics of several Latin American groups. For instance, a colleague from Princeton and I looked at how U.S. immigration policy may influence emigration and return from Mexico, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic, confirming the notion that enforcement-only approaches do not curb emigration from places with well-established migrant networks and suggesting increased enforcement may have further motivated migrants to delay returning home (or circulating between their places of origins and the U.S. at the very least). I took some of these lessons a bit further in a piece I wrote for a volume edited by the Mexican Population Council (the government body in charge of designing the country's population policy). In said paper, I describe recent changes in the migration dynamics of Mexicans and lay out the policy implications of these changes. I discuss the policy implications of these changes in general (whether potentially affected by policies or not) and make specific policy recommendations that could help fix the immigration system. In addition to echoing some recommendations put forth by other scholars with regards to creating a temporary worker program with a clear (but non-definite) avenue for permanent residence/ citizenship, I also suggest measures within this program that would promote the return of laborers to, along with their insertion in, the formal economy of their places of origin, which would be in line with some of the main migration-return motivations of people.
"What's New" updated February 2009
Riosmena, F., R. Kuhn, & C. Jochem. (2017). Explaining the immigrant health advantage: self-selection and protection among five major national-origin immigrant groups in the United States. Demography 54(1):175-200. 10.1007/s13524-016-0542-2
Beltrán-Sánchez, H., A. Palloni, F. Riosmena, & R. Wong. (2016). SES Gradients among Mexicans in the United States and in Mexico: A New Twist to the Hispanic Paradox?. Demography 53(5):1555-1581.
Riosmena, F. (2016). The theoretical potential and methodological limits of cross-context comparative research on migration. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 666(1):28-45.
Nawrotzki, R. J., Riosmena, F., Hunter, L. M., & Runfola, D. M. 2015. (2015). Amplification or suppression: Social networks and the climate change – migration association in rural Mexico. Global Environmental Change 35, 463-474. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.002
Riosmena, F., B. Everett, R. Rogers, & J. Dennis. (2015). Negative Acculturation and Nothing More? Cumulative Disadvantage and Hispanic Mortality during the Immigrant Adaptation Process. nternational Migration Review49(2):443-478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imre.120102. (link no longer available)
Publications updated May 2017