Paper Guidelines
Deadlines
1) Proposal – due in recitation the week of October 18th.
2) Final paper – hardcopy due to TA in recitation (week of Nov 22) or his Gugg. mailbox and
softcopy to turnitin.com by 5pm on Wed. Nov 24
Late papers will be
downgraded 10% for every day late.
General Format
The
paper should be between 2000 and 2500 words in length (usually 8-10 double-spaced
pages), not including tables, graphs, maps etc and bibliography. Be sure to staple your hardcopy before
submitting. Also, avoid any unusual
fonts and margins (12pt Times New Roman font and 1-1.25 inch margins are
standard). Please save any cover pages
for the trees (similarly, double-sided printing is encouraged).
Any
standardized referencing system is acceptable so long as it is internally
consistent. See the following links if
you need examples.
Proposal:
The
proposal should be a couple of paragraphs in length and should include some
preliminary references. An ideal proposal would a) briefly state the
question to be answered, b) state the theory that will be used to try to
understand or analyze the problem, and c) would list some key references.
Proposals must be typed.
Students
should meet/email with one of the instructors if they have any questions about
the proposal or the topic. The key is to pick an interesting contemporary
problem and draw on political geographic theories to gain some insights into
this problem. A focused topic is more likely to produce a successful paper.
Term
Paper:
Topic:
This
is an analytical paper, not a descriptive one.
This is also an argumentative paper: you must have a thesis (an
argument), and your thesis should be stated in the first paragraph. The topic must be a contemporary one (i.e.
after 1945) and should be political-geographic in nature. The
‘political-geographic’ rubric is broad and most topics can be accommodated in
that framework. If in doubt, consult one of the instructors. Examples of acceptable topics are: a) what
caused the collapse of the
After
you define the topic of interest, which of the following sets of
political-geographic theories can help to understand the subject – a)
geopolitical theories (classical and critical); b) world-system theories (Wallerstein and Modelski); c)
globalization theories – economic, cultural, world-city, etc; d) state theory –
including those that explain the stability of regimes; and e) nationalism
theories (primordial, Marxist, mixed). Read the sections of the text that
explain/review the relevant theory and follow up on some key references, preferably
from the original author – e.g. for Wallerstein’s
world-systems theory, read some of Wallerstein’s
original works.
After
you become familiar with the theory and its elements (assumptions, background,
expectations, relations, predictions, etc), read about the topic from that
perspective. For example, looking at the Silk Road Act from a critical
geopolitical perspective, you could examine its statements about democracy,
By
the time the proposal is due, we will have covered world-system theories, globalization
and democratization, so you need to look ahead to the textbook and assigned
readings for the other theories. In particular, if you are dealing with a
nationalist conflict, read the chapter in the Taylor/Flint text on this topic.
Structure
About
2-3 pages should be devoted to elaboration of the theory, and why it is useful
for the examination of this particular topic. There is no need to present
all the details of the theory, but focus on those elements that are more
relevant to your topic. Then, devote the remainder of the paper to
showing how this theory is helpful in understanding the problem at hand.
You will have to present empirical details of the problem but emphasis should
be on interpretation using the theory.
Term
Paper Grading:
|
Theory |
|
Empirical |
|
Analysis |
|
Writing |
|
|
One of the political geographic theories specified |
|
Clear choice of topic |
|
Uses theory well |
|
Well written: structured with a clear thesis, section headings, conclusion, etc. |
|
|
Clear or unclear
|
|
Accurate and relevant facts |
|
Able to interpret specific events in wider theoretical context |
|
Correct grammar and spelling |
|
|
Sophisticated or superficial |
|
No key data missing |
|
Able to pick events to illustrate point |
|
Reference are complete and follow guidelines |
|
|
Is there a better theoretical alternative?
|
|
Political geographic in nature |
|
Thorough connections or missing links |
|
Use of ancillary materials (e.g. maps when appropriate) |
|
|
Length: 2000-2500 words |
|
||||||
|
Column Totals |
/20 |
|
/20 |
|
/40 |
|
/20 |
|
GRAND TOTAL (out of 100) |
|
||||||