Lecture Notes: Oct. 28  (post-midterm)

 

 

Before the mid-term we covered material about natural resources, getting to p. 108.   Post-mid-term material then starts with the “Sinks: Solid Waste Problems” on p. 108.

 

We moved this material fast, and it was only lightly dealt with in lecture, in order to move on to the Population and Environment material (Chap 5), so that we’re caught up with the schedule.

 

Sinks: Solid Waste Problems

 

Whether we are about to run out of a resource or not (the “source” question), we’re still using a growing amount of raw material in modern industrial society, and more and more attention is now paid to the “sink” end of the line: how do we dispose of material resources? Humans have done this throughout their history by creating dumps, which today we call landfills. Alternatively, some of our solid wastes can be incinerated. Finally, we can reduce the amount of waste by re-cycling material.

 

Solid wastes come from industrial sources, like mining and manufacturing, and from “municipal” sources (including household and commercial sources). In the past, before about the 1960s, there was less control over industrial wastes, and they we often literally dumped on the ground either near the source, in landfills, in oceans and lakes, or sometimes simply illegally out in rural areas.  The legacy of this dumping is now visible in problems like toxic impacts on groundwater and human health in places like Love canal, NY, a housing subdivision built on top of an old  chemical manufacturing site that included an on-site dump, covered with a bit of soil. (we’ll return to this story later).

 

Most municipal waste comes form household sources, and though these are typically thought of as relatively benign:

 

60% of  household is paper, cardboard, yard

40% is glass, plastic, aluminum, iron, and other minerals

 

But some typical municipal wastes can create a toxic legacy. Household wastes like paint, thinner, pesticides, petroleum products, etc. also end up in the municipal waste stream and thus into landfills.  While many places prohibit such wastes disposal, it is hard to enforce such rules and people find there are very few options for getting rid of hazardous waste.

 

The modern landfill is a big improvement over past practices, especially in terms of lining that helps keep the material out of the soil ands groundwater. The problem is that even seemingly benign wastes can breakdown in a landfill into more toxic substances, as metals, plastics, and petroleum products are “leached”out of the landfill by water (rain and melting snow) percolating thru the pile. Modern standards require that this “leachate” be contained and not allowed to affect groundwater or soils. I illustrated this with slides of the Jefferson County landfill, a well-run case where the debris pile is lined above and below with impermeable materials, and leachate is collected in pipes and allowed to evaporate in a pond. But, as Haper writes, even well-managed landfills eventually leak a bit, and who is going to take care of them over future decades?

 

Options: Incineration is growing, but faces severe problems---people do not want to live near waste incinerators because they do release at least small amounts of toxic materials.  Incineration is also very expensive, so only wealthier communities appear willing to try it—the rest use typical dumps.

 

Recycling is important, but mostly applies to  just a few key material wastes, like paper, plastic and glass. About 24% of household waste is recycled or composted, and re-cycling faces economic limitations.

 

 The obvious key solution is “source reduction” or “dematerialization.” Even recycled material eventually ends up in the landfill, but if the total volume or mass is reduced at initial extraction and production, then the total waste will decline.  This could be less packaging, size reduction (e.g., of cars), etc.

 

Chemical Pollution and Toxic Wastes (pp. 111-119)

 

We really ran fast through this. Simply be aware of the main sources of:

 

Agricultural pollutants:

 

Herbicides, Fungicides and Pesticides: various chemicals used to kill diseases and pests that reduce crop production. While most everyone agreed eventually that some pesticides, especially the long-lasting ones like the “clorinated hydrocarbons” (e.g., DDT) , had negative impacts on ecosystems, modern agro-chemical pesticides, mostly “organophosphates” degrade faster and don’t accumulate like DDT, but there’s still a debate over their impact on the environment.

 

Fertilizer residues: the other main type of agricultural chemical pollution is left-over nitrate and phosphate from fertilizers. Agricultural fertilizers have caused great crop yield improvements, but there I some tendency for over-fertilization which leaves residues that work their way into surface and groundwater. Increased fertilization of surface waters causes what Harper calls “cultural euthrophication” where enhanced aquatic plant growth caused by over-fertilization depletes oxygen and causes local waters to loose their ability to support many aquatic species.

 

Industrial Toxics:

 

The global production and consumption system inevitably produces toxic compounds (keys ones here are heavy metals like lead and synthetic organic compounds. Carefully managed and disposed of, these can be safely handled, but accidents and neglect sometimes disperse them into air, water, and soil. The heavy metals are especially known for the neurological impacts (neurotoxins) , while some subset of synthetic organic compounds  used industry are carcinogens (cancer-causing agents) and mutagens (cause genetic damage and defects).  Harper does not mention it but I also mentioned in class teratogens, chemicals that tend to cause birth defects in mammals. 

 

Many uncertainties with these pollutants:

 

1.      As Harper points out, it is difficult in many cases to link a particular chemcial to adverse health effects, which may take some time to emerge in an exposed population.

2.      Not all synthetic chemicals are harmful, but testing takes a lot of time and we have not tested the toxicity of many compounds in current use.

3.      Even when tested, scientists disagree with their toxicity.

 

Urban and Municipal Pollution

 

We only discussed one form of municipal pollution, waste water or sewer. In the MDCs, including the US, most wastewater is treated to remove solids and degrade organic pollutants and diseases. Even this creates solid waste or “sludge” that is either applied to farmland as fertilizer or is placed in conventional landfills.

 

Ship the rest of this chapter so that we can get caught up on the population issue.