|
GEOG 2002: Geographies of Global
Change: Spring 2004 |
|
Home |
Syllabus |
Course
Materials | Electronic
Reserves | Paper
Guidelines | Paper
Submission | Sample
Exam | Debates |
Links |
Geography |
Contact |
Debate
1
|
Debate on the Competition for
|
The
second debate in week 7 of the class is on the subject of the current
competition for access to the oil reserves in the
There
are five positions - each corresponding to a team. Each team is asked to
respond to the 4 questions below in their presentation.
For each team, we suggest a web link if you want more information on the
perspective that you are representing. You can also, of
course, find other materials in the library or on the Web to help your
argument.
Team A
|
Official U.S. Governmental Policy
|
Eizenstat Testimony on US Involvement in Caspian Sea
Oil (1998),
See also Iran: Current Developments and US Policy, a
CRS Congressional Brief (p. 13, Caspian Sea Oil, note: this is a .pdf
document),
Team B
|
Azerbaijan (the key oil state in the region)
|
“The Independent Azerbaijan’s Oil Policy,” a
lecture by Nasib Nassibli (1998),
See also the Caspian
Information Agency for recent events, Baku Today, an Azeri regional newspaper,
and the BBC Country Profiles.
Team C
|
Major Oil Companies
|
British Petroleum – News on the Baku-Ceyhan Pipeline
ChevronTexaco News (about the Caspian
Pipeline Consortium)
Team D
|
Russia
|
“Russia’s New Caspian Policy,” by Doug Blum
(2000)
Speech by Victor Kalyuzhny, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2003)
Team E
|
Critics of US Policy
|
Third World Traveler, “Behind the Fog of Deception: Washington’s Real War
Aims,” Lance Selfa (2001)
Environmentalists: Department
of Energy, Analysis of Caspian Sea Environmental Issues
Human Rights Activists: Amnesty International Criticisms of Baku-Ceyhan