WHAT WAS SOCIALISM, AND WHAT COMES
NEXT?
- Overview:
- Today we're going to answer two questions
- What Was Socialism?
- Why did it Collapse?
- Over the next few weeks, we'll be answering a third question
- How does the experience of state socialism change the trajectories
and development of Eastern European countries?
- Why Didn't We Predict the Collapse of Socialism?
- Number of academics, politicians, and journalists who predicted
the Collapse in 1989.
- Why?
- Lack of information: we didn't have access to much information
- Americans have many preconceived ideas about socialism
- These ideas come from propaganda that existed in our own
country from 1945-1989, increasing during times of crisis, decreasing
at other times
- McCarthy era
- Increase in propaganda during other times of US-USSR crisis,
eg. Reagan era
- What Was Socialism?
- Communism vs. Socialism
- A political and economic movement that changed the political
and economic geography of the world
- Political geography
- Communism was a political movement: rule by a one-party state
which seized power from the bourgeois or capitalist class, and
governed in the interests of the working class.
- "Containment"
- "Iron Curtain" a fluid line.
- Berlin Airlift
- Wars: Korea, Vietnam.
- Changed the economic geography of the world
- Communism was as much an economic as political movement.
- The idea of letting the workers own the means of production
- Planned Economies as a central feature of socialism. That
is, the state, not the market, balances supply and demand.
- It does so via a model of centrally planned redistribution
- Lemonade example
- Works well in theory - but we'll see, not so well in practice.
- Why did State Socialism Collapse?
- The Tower of Pisa model
- Reagan/Bush take credit for Fall of Berlin Wall
- Story is perhaps more complex than that: four important factors
- Socialism had its own propensity towards collapse
- Dissidents pushing it over
- Gorbachev holding it up by threatening invasion
- Reagan/Bush making it difficult for Gorbi to do that
- Socialism's inherent tendency towards collapse
- Parent-state
- Would have worked great, if the state could deliver. But
the planned economy didn't work in practice. Subject to great
shortages.
- Plan bargaining, hoarding
- Hoarding - shortage - hoarding
- Led to both shortages in one place and aggregate shortages
in the economy.
- Dissidence
- Shortages in Poland very acute, system is verging on collapse
in late 1970's.
- Solidarity as Union of workers and intellectuals
- Two important strategies
- As dependent as the workers were on the state, the state
was dependent on them. Genesis of strike strategy.
- Strikes in Lenin shipyards
- Solidarity: nobody goes back to work until all demands are
met
- 90% of all workers on strike towards 1980-81.
- It worked bc. It deprived the state of resources to redistribute,
and hence of legitimacy
- SELF-LIMITING
- Martial law imposed
- 1989: Gorbachev announces he will not militarily support
EE regimes
- Beginning of the end
- Wall collapses in 1989
- TAKE HOME POINTS
- State socialism was a system with its own internal predisposition
to collapse
- Dissidents removed the state's right to represent the working
class and the mass of people
- The collapse of socialism was a complex blend of factors,
but the most important ones happened INSIDE Eastern Europe.