Course schedule
Note: schedule and readings subject to
change.
I.
The Discipline
1.
August 25:
Intros
i.
Carl O.
Sauer, "The Education of a Geographer." Reprinted from The Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 46
(1956): 287-99.
ii.
Peter
Kropotkin, ÒWhat
geography ought to be.Ó 1885.
iii.
AAG, Statement
of Professional Ethics.
Additional
reading:
iv.
Steven
Harrison, Doreen Massey, Keith Richards, Francis Magilligan,
Nigel Thrift, and Barbara Bender. 2004.
ÒThinking
across the divide: perspectives on the conversations between physical and human
geography.Ó Area, 36(4): 435-442.
v.
Mei-Po
Kwan. 2004. ÒBeyond
difference: from canonical geography to hybrid geographies.Ó Annals
of the Association of American Geographers 94(4): 756-763.
2.
September
1: Approaches to the history of
geography
i.
Questioning Geography, pp. 1-54
ii.
David
Livingstone. 1992. ÒShould
the history of geography be x-rated? telling
geographyÕs story.Ó In The Geographical Tradition. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 1-31.
iii.
Mona Domosh. ÒTowards
a feminist historiography of geography.Ó Transactions of the
British Institute of Geographers. 16 (1991): 95-104
iv. David Harvey, "On the History and Present Condition of Geography: An Historical Materialist Manifesto," Professional Geographer, Vol. 36, No. 1 (February 1984): 1-11.
v.
Laura Pulido, ÒReflections
on a white discipline.Ó The Professional Geographer 54(1):
42-49.
II. Making
Geography Scientific
3.
September 8:
Enlightenment traditions
Following
up on history of geography
i.
Nick
Clifford. 2009. Entry for ÒPhyscial Geography.Ó In Gregory, et al., eds. The Dictionary of
Human Geography, 5th Edition (pp. 531-538). Malden, MA:
Wiley-Blackwell.
ii.
Nick
Clifford. 2001. ÒPhysical
geography – the naughty world revisitedÓ (Editorial). Transactions,
Institute of British Geographers, 26: 387-389.
iii.
QG: 80-95
Enlightenment
traditions
iv.
Alexander
von Humboldt
1.
Browse the
Humboldt digital
library.
2.
Read the Intro
to The Cosmos, pp. 1-9
(1858).
3.
View HumboldtÕs
plant geography (online,
interactive version).
v.
David
R. Stoddart, "Darwin's
Impact on Geography," Annals of the
Association of American Geographers, Vol. 56 (Dec., 1966): 683-698.
vi.
Stuart Elden. 2008. ÒReassessing
Kant's geography.Ó Journal of Historical Geography 35
(2009): 3-25.
4.
September 15
– Moderinizing Geography
i.
QG,
pp. 55-79
ii.
Halford Mackinder.
1996 (1904). ÒThe
Geographical Pivot of History.Ó In J. Agnew, et al., eds. Human
Geography: an essential anthology.
Malden, MA: Blackwell. Pp. 536-551.
iii.
Richard
Hartshorne. ÒWhat
Kind of a Science is Geography?Ó The
Nature of Geography. Lancaster, PA: AAG.
1939.
iv.
Friedrich Ratzel. 1996
(1896). ÒThe
Territorial Growth of States.Ó In J. Agnew, et al., eds.
Human Geography: an essential anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Pp. 525-535.
v.
Ellen
Churchill Semple, ÒOperation
of Geographic factors in historyÓ (Chapter 1). In Influence of
Geographic Environment on the Basis of Ratzel's
System of Anthropo-geography. New York: Russell and Russell, 1911.
5.
September
22: Critical reflections – Working with Uncertainty
i.
QG, pp.
96-114
ii.
Michel
Foucault, ÒWhat is Enlightenment?Ó In Rabinow, P. ed. The Foucault
Reader. New York: Pantheon
Books, 1984, pp. 32-50.
iii.
Jorge Luis
Borges, On exactitude in science. 1946.
iv.
Donna Haraway. ÒSituated
Knowledges: The science question in feminism and the
privilege of partial perspective.Ó Feminist
Studies, 1988, 4(3): 575-599.
v.
Bruno Latour. 1999. ÒCirculating
Reference.Ó In PandoraÕs hope: essays
on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pp. 24-79 (Chapter 2).
III. Key
Debates
6.
September
29: Earth systems
i.
QG, part 3: 115-150
ii.
Ron
Johnston. 2005. ÒGeography
(and geographers) and earth system science.Ó Geoforum 37:7-11.
iii.
A.J.
Pitman. 2005. ÒOn
the role of Geography in Earth System Science.Ó Geoforum 36: 137-148.
iv.
Nick
Clifford and Keith Richards. 2005.
ÒEarth
system science: an oxymoron?Ó Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
30:379-383.
v.
Student
selections (Tony, Adrienne, Nate; leaders)
7.
October 6:
Nature/Society
i.
Raymond
Williams, ÒNature.Ó In Keywords:
a vocabulary of culture and society, revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983,
pp. 219-224.
ii.
Clarence Glacken. Traces
on the Rhodian Shore. Preface, pp. vii-xii, 1967. Excerpted in
Agnew, J. et al., eds. Human Geography: an essential anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Pp. 246-251.
iii.
Watts,
M. ÒNature:Culture,Ó In Cloke and
Johnston, eds. Spaces of geographical thought. London: Sage, 2005, pp. 142-174.
iv.
Student
Selections (Mason, Amanda, Beth, Kristin)
2.
K.
McAfee. 1999. ÒSelling
nature to save it? Biodiversity and the rise of green developmentalism.Ó Environment
and Planning D: Society and Space, 17(2):133-154.
3.
M. Sahlins. 1996.
ÒThe
sadness of sweetness: the Native anthropology of Western cosmology.Ó [comments and
reply optional]. Current
Anthropology, 37(3): 395-428.
8.
October 13:
Place in all its senses
i.
QG, 167-185,
226-240
ii.
Yi-Fu
Tuan. ÒSpace
and place: a humanistic perspectiveÓ (1974). In Agnew, J. et al., eds. Human Geography:
an essential anthology.
Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 444-457.
iii.
Antonio Gramsci, Selections
from the Prison Notebooks. New
York: International Publishers, 1971, p. 447-8. Read
all of p. 447 and 448 up until the ÒNote.Ó You may also want to read this brief definition of ÒPhilosophy
of Praxis.Ó
iv.
Doreen
Massey. ÒPolitics
and Space/Time.Ó New Left Review, 1992, no. 196, pp.
65-84.
v.
Edward
Said. Orientalism, 25th
Anniversary Edition. New York:
Vintage Books. Pp. 1-9, 49-73.
vi.
Student
selections (Grant, Jenn, Amy)
1.
Michael Dear
and Steven Flusty. 1998. ÒPostmodern
urbanism.Ó Annals of the Association of American
Geographers, 88(1):50-72.
9.
October 20:
Cartography/GIS
i.
QG: 189-205
ii.
Dawn Wright,
Michael Goodchild, and James Proctor. 1997. ÒGIS:
tool or science? Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as a ÔtoolÕ
versus Ôscience.ÕÓ Annals of the
Association of American Geographers, 87(2): 346-362.
iii.
John
Pickles. 1997. ÒTool
or science? GIS, technoscience, and the theoretical
turn.Ó Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87(2): 363-372.
iv.
Jeremy Crampton and J. Krygier. 2006. ÒAn Introduction to Critical
Cartography.Ó ACME, 4(1): 11-33.
v.
Denis Wood.
2003. ÒCartography
is dead (thank God!).Ó Cartographic Perspectives, 45: 4-7.
vi.
Student
selections (Julie Hicks, Petra, Julia Uhlendorf)
1.
Robert
McMaster and Eric Sheppard. 2004.
ÒIntroduction:
Scale and Geographic Inquiry.Ó In Sheppard and McMaster, eds.
Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature,
Society, and Method. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 1-22.
Additional readings (not required)
vii.
Mei-Po
Kwan. 2002. ÒFeminist
visualization: re-envisioning GIS method in feminist geography.Ó Annals
of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4): 645-661.
viii.
Michael Goodchild. ÒSpatial
information science.Ó Keynote Address. Fourth International Symposium on Spatial Data. 1990.
ix.
John
Snow. 1855. On the mode of
communication of cholera. Review Part
I and map.
10. October 27: Quantitative approaches
i.
QG 206-225,
241-257
ii.
Mei-Po Kwan,
2004. ÒBeyond
difference: from canonical geographies to hybrid geographies.Ó Annals
of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2): 756-763.
iii.
Trevor
Barnes, 2009. ÒÔNot
only É but alsoÕ: quantitative and critical geography.Ó The Professional Geographer, 61(3):
292-300.
iv.
Student
selections
1.
Poon, Jessie PH. "Quantitative
methods: not positively positivist." Progress in Human Geography 29
(2005): 776-72.
2. Wagner, Helene H., and
Marie-JosŽe Fortin. 2005. Spatial
analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology 86, no. 8 (8): 1975-1987.
IV.
The uses and abuses of geography
11.
November 3: Climate Change
i.
Guest: Mark Serreze
ii.
QG: 277-293
iii.
David Demeritt.
2001. ÒThe
construction of global warming and the politics of science.Ó Annals of the
American Association of Geographers, 91(2): 307-337.
iv.
Steven
Schneider. 2001. ÒA
constructive deconstruction of constructionists: a response to Demeritt.Ó Annals of the Association of American
Geographers, 91(2): 338-344.
v.
David Demeritt.
2001. ÒScience
and the understanding of science.Ó Annals of the Association of
American Geographers, 91(2): 345-348.
vi.
Mike Hulme, 2008. ÒGeographical
work at the boundaries of climate change.Ó Transactions, 33:5-11.
vii.
Gita Laidler. 2006.
ÒInuit
and scientific perspectives on the relationship between sea ice and climate
change: the ideal complement?Ó
Climactic Change, 78(2-4): 1573-1480.
12.
November 10:
Development
i.
Neil Smith.
1997. ÒThe
Satanic Geographies of Globalization: Uneven Development in the 1990s.Ó Public Culture, 10(1): 169-189.
ii.
James
Ferguson and Larry Lohman. 1997 (1994). ÒDevelopment
and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho.Ó In Rahnema,
M. and V. Bawtree, eds. The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Press. Pp. 223-233.
iii.
Jeffrey
Sachs, et al. 2001. ÒThe
Geography of Poverty and Wealth.Ó
Scientific American 284(3): 70-75.
iv.
Paul
Collier, 2003. ÒThe
Market for Civil War.Ó Foreign
Policy, May/June 2003; 38-55.
v.
Michael
Watts, 2003. ÒEconomies
of Violence; More Oil, More Blood.Ó Economic and Political Weekly, 38(48):
5089-5099.
vi.
Victoria Lawson, 2007.
ÒGeographies
of Care and Responsibility.Ó
Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1):1-11.
Supplemental
viewing
vii.
VIDEO: World Bank. 2008. ÒWorld
Development Report 2009.Ó Available on YouTube.
13.
November 17:
Geography and Empire
i.
Guest: John OÕLaughlin
ii.
Trevor J.
Barnes. 2008. ÒGeographyÕs
underworld: the military–industrial complex, mathematical modeling and
the quantitative revolution,Ó Geoforum 39:
3–16.
iii.
Richard A.
Beck. 2003. ÒRemote
Sensing and GIS as Counterterrorism Tools in the Afghanistan War: A Case Study
of Zhawar Kili Region.Ó
The Professional Geographer, 55(2): 170-179.
iv.
John OÕLaughlin.
2005. ÒThe
war on terrorism, academic publication norms, and replication.Ó The Professional Geographer, 57(4):
588-591.
v.
Richard A.
Beck. 2005. ÒReplies
to Commentaries by OÕLaughlin and Shroder.Ó
The Professional Geographer, 57(4): 598-608.
vi.
Robert
Kaplan. ÒThe
Revenge of Geography.Ó Foreign
Policy, May/June 2009.
vii.
(Various). 2009. ÒGeography
writes back: Response to KaplanÕs ÔThe Revenge of Geography.ÕÓ Human
Geography, 2(2): 33-51.
Supplemental reading
i.
Jack Shroder, 2005.
ÒRemote
Sensing and GIS as Counterterrorism Tools in the Afghanistan War: Reality, Plus
the Results of Media Hyperbole.Ó The Professional Geographer, 57(4):
592-597.
November 24 –
no class (Fall Break)
14.
December 1:
Restoration/conservation
i.
Guest: John Pitlick
ii.
William Cronon. 1996. ÒThe
Trouble with Wilderness.Ó
In W. Cronon, ed. Uncommon Ground: rethinking the human
place in nature. New York: W.W.
Norton. Pp. 69-90.
iii.
John C.
Schmidt, et al. 1998. ÒScience
and values in River Restoration in the Grand Canyon.Ó BioScience,
48(9): 735-747. **Be sure to read Table 3
carefully.**
iv.
Tim P.
Barnett and David W. Pierce, 2008.
ÒWhen
will Lake Mead go dry?Ó Water
Resources Research, 44 (10p).
v.
Balaji Rajagopalan, et al. 2009. ÒWater
supply risk on the Colorado River: Can management mitigate?Ó Water Resources Research, 45 (7p).
15.
December 8:
The future of Geography?
i.
QG: 294-307
ii.
Nigel
Thrift. 2002. ÒThe
future of Geography.Ó Geoforum 33:
291-298.
iii.
Nicholas J.
Clifford. 2002. ÒThe
future of Geography: why the whole is less than the sum of its parts.Ó
Geoforum 33: 431-436.
iv.
Ron
Johnston. 2002. ÒReflections
on Nigel ThriftÕs optimism: political strategies to implement his vision.Ó
Geoforum 33: 421-425.
v.
Billy Lee
Turner. 2002. ÒResponse
to ThriftÕs Ôthe future of Geography.ÕÓ Geoforum
33: 427-429.