CONSIDERATIONS ON MATERIALISM

Importance of the relationship between man and nature - recognition of the "passive side" of consciousness - of the way in which man is conditioned by its own physical structure and the natural environment.

What is materialism? How are we to understand it?

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE PRIORITY OF NATURE OVER MIND
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE PHYSICAL LEVEL OVER THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL LEVEL BOTH IN THE SENSE OF
A. CHRONOLOGICAL PRIORITY - THE LONG TIME BEFORE LIFE APPEARED ON EARTH AND BETWEEN ORIGIN OF LIFE AND THE ORIGIN OF MAN
B. CONDITIONING WHICH NATURE STILL EXERCISES ON MAN AND WILL CONTINUE TO EXERCISE FOR THE FORESEABLE FUTURE.

EXPERIENCE CANNOT BE REDUCED TO EITHER A PRODUCTION OF REALITY BY A SUBJECT OR TO A RECIPROCAL IMPLICATION OF SUBJECT AND OBJECT.

THERE IS ALWAYS AN ELEMENT OF PASSIVITY IN EXPERIENCE: THE EXTERNAL SITUATION WHICH WE DO NOT CREATE BUT WHICH IMPOSES ITSELF UPON US. NOR CAN THIS EXTERNAL DATUM BE REABSORBED BY MAKING IT A MERE NEGATIVE MOMENT IN THE ACTIVITY OF THE SUBJECT, OR BY MAKING BOTH THE SUBJECT AND THE OBJECT MERE MOMENTS, DISTINGUISHABLE ONLY IN ABSTRACTION, OF A SINGLE EFFECTIVE REALITY CONSTITUTED BY EXPERIENCE.
THE EXTERNAL DATUM DOES NOT EXIST SOLELY AS A FUNCTION OF THE ACTIVITY OF THE SUBJECT.

FROM A MATERIALIST STANDPOINT, ONE MUST TAKE INTO ACCOUNT MAN'S CONDITION IN THE WORLD AS IT IS ESTABLISHED BY THE RESULTS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. THESE RESULTS ARE NOT MERE CONTENTS OF OUR THOUGHTS OR OF OUR ACTIVITY BUT ARE A REFLECTION OF A REALITY INDEPENDENT OF OUR THOUGHTS.

Materialism essentially is a critique of anthropocentrism and an emphasis on the conditioning of man by nature.

Nature is not a prehistoric antecedent to human history but a reality that still limits and conditions man who enters in. relationship with nature actively, via labor, and passively, through heredity, through the influence of the natural environment and his own biological characteristics over his body and, therefore, over his intellectual, moral and psychological personality.

IF WE ARE STUDYING THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF SOCIETY WE MAY LEGITIMATELY PASS OVER THE PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL LEVEL, IN AS MUCH AS RELATIVE TO A GIVEN HISTORICAL PERIOD, IT IS CONSTANT.

WE CANNOT DENY THE CONDITION NATURE EXERCISES ON HUMANITY IN GENERAL JUST BECAUSE THE CONDITIONING DOES NOT CONSPICUOUSLY DIFFERENTIATE INDIVIDUAL EPOCHS OF HUMAN HISTORY.

MAN IS A BIOLOGICAL BEING ENDOWED WITH A CERTAIN, NOT UNLIMITED, ADAPTABILITY TO HIS EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT, AND WITH CERTAIN IMPULSES TOWARDS ACTIVITY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS, SUBJECT TO OLD AGE AND DEATH IS NOT AN ABSTRACT CONSTRUCTION BUT STILL EXISTS IN EACH OF US.

SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT MAY CHANGE THE WAY PEOPLE EXPERIECE PAIN, PLEASURE AND OTHER REACTIONS; THERE IS HARDLY ANYTHING "PURELY NATURAL" LEFT IN CONTEMPORARY MAN THAT HAS NOT BEEN ENRICHED AND REMOULDED BY THE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT. TO MAINTAIN THAT, SINCE THE BIOLOGICAL IS ALWAYS PRESENTED TO US AS MEDIATED BY THE SOCIAL, THE BIOLOGICAL IS NOTHING AND THE SOCIAL EVERYTHING, WOULD BE IDEALIST SOPHISTRY.

From Sebastiano Timpanaro, On Materialism. London: Verso, 1976.

HISTORICAL MATERIALISM - MARX'S MATERIALIST CONCEPTION OF HISTORY

- DENIAL OF THE AUTONOMY AND PRIMACY OF IDEAS
- METHODOLOGICAL COMMITMENT TO HISTORICAL RESEARCH (e.g., study of MODES OF PRODUCTION rather than "SOCIETY."
- EMPHASIS ON THE DIALECTICAL RELATION BETWEEN HUMANITY AND NATURE THROUGH LABOR AND THE UNAVOIDABLE TRANSFORMATION OF BOTH.
- AN ASYMMETRICAL VIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND NATURE; HUMANS ARE ESSENTIALLY DEPENDENT ON NATURE BUT NATURE IS ESSENTIALLY INDEPENDENT OF HUMANS

Adapted from T. Bottomore et al, A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1983, pp. 324-325