Representations are constrained not only
by manifold external parameters,
but also by
the author's own subject position.
This position is constructed through the
author's personal intent,
intellectual affinities, preconceptions as well as
his/her awareness and sensitivity to facets of the representational category.
The other two sections of this performance
(text and intertext) explore this relationship between representation and subject position
as a means to determine the validity of early
academic representations of Tantra.

Authorial subject position is also a
product of placement or orientation.
That is, how an author positions him/herself
with respect to the object of study,
 
on top
 
inside,
outside
 
or below
 
The critique of this relationship has a long and often times painful history that goes back a least to Aristotle. Debates have raged on whether an insider or outsider position was more responsible and efficacious.