I Don't Want to be a Computer!-2/3
Increasingly, it is clear why we are eager
to have computers read essay exams, as they have been doing other
kinds of exams for a very long time. It is because our model for the
educated is the computer itself. The machine treats all data consistently
and objectively. It can always come down to a yes-no decision and
it never sits in a quandary over which choice to make. It is fast.
And, as the growth in computer hardware demonstrates, the extent of
its storage of information, its ability to transmit and receive information,
and its processing speed correlate with its value.
I’d suggest a principle. The operative
ideal educators have for an educated person is most perfectly represented
in the methods by which we communicate with students in our process
of evaluating them. If we evaluate students using a method of sstanding
the student before an examination board that grills her or him, we
hold the ideal educated person in a model of hierarchy, perhaps aristocracy,
where one’s place determines who one is. The educated have the privilege
even of harassment. Here education is a process of initiation into
realms of power. Successfully educated one accedes to roles higher
in the hierarchy and gains the power to manipulate others. Little
surprise that this method is common to military schools and law schools.
If we evaluate students by method designed to advance learning as
much as to evaluate, say a conversation in which it is possible that
the teacher may shift and modify her/his positions through interaction
with the student, we present a model of an educated person as one
open to interaction with and capable of learning from all others.
If it exists at all this method might be found in humanities programs
in liberal arts colleges. If we evaluate students by objectivist criteria
exacted by computing machines, we see the machine as the model of
the educated person, the cyborg de-emphasizing the "org."