Faculty Focus Group
Topic: Instructional Facilities

April 2002
Notes

How do you typically use a technology facility on campus? How well is it supported? How could the support be improved?

  • Projection
  • Networking
  • Interactive computers
  • Freedom to install software in labs, more open architecture
    • May need more specific facilities-some like up and running model, others would like to be able to be more interactive with computers.
  • Hard to get smart classroom
  • Inefficient use of smart classrooms-many professors only need technology a couple of times a semester. Would be more efficient to have a central location to pick up projector and screen.
  • Paying for site licenses is also inefficient-feel like they are being nickeled and dimed. - Would like less central control of labs-would prefer to support labs departmentally with grad student or other tech person.

Describe a positive experience you have had with a lab or a smart classroom?

  • Able to expose students to technology-student demand is very high
  • Labs are very good when they work
  • Engineering labs are good
  • Humanities labs and classrooms have very good, local support
  • Key card entries are good
  • Wireless labs are good

Describe a negative experience you have had with a lab or smart classroom?

  • Servers going down in ITLL
  • Network congestion
  • Software doesn't work
  • Cable TV signals not working
  • Post lab hours
  • Extend lab hours at end of semester-longer hours needed in general
  • Ergonomics, lighting, heating a problem
  • Horseshoe configuration is wanted in teaching labs
  • Listen to faculty

What technology should every classroom on campus have?

They would like at least ACCESS TO:

  • Overhead
  • Network connection
  • Screen
  • Whiteboard/chalkboard
  • Video projector
  • Laptop
  • Sound system
  • VHS
  • DVD/CD

Labs should all have:

  • Up to date computer and software
  • Network access with at least 8 extra jacks
  • OR wireless

What would you change?

  • Would like a faculty advisory committee
  • Decentralize some things
  • Departmental control
  • Distributive support
  • Custom fit service to individual needs
  • Ubiquitous networks
  • Think big-don't underestimate
  • Facilitate adoption of technology
  • Distributed, mobile, moveable
  • Maintain flexibility
  • Don't let technology drive the changes, faculty and students should drive them

Please direct questions about this focus group summary to Deborah Keyek-Franssen at deblkf@colorado.edu.

Home
Full Report
Executive Summary
Trends
Vision
Planning Process
Contact Us
Home | Full Report | Executive Summary | Contact Us | CU Home
Last Updated: September 25, 2002