Dry Heath Arctic
Tundra Responses to Long-Term Nutrient and Light Manipulation (pp 211-218)
L. Gough, P. A. Wookey,
and G. R. Shaver
Long-term fertilization
studies in several arctic ecosystems have demonstrated dramatic responses of
plant community structure with concomitant changes in ecosystem properties. Although
these results are well documented in moist tussock and wet sedge tundra, dry
heath tundra has been less studied. In an Alaskan dry heath arctic tundra, we
conducted a biomass harvest of plants that received additional nitrogen (N, 10
g m-2 yr-1) and/or phosphorus (P, 5 g m-2 yr-1)
or reduced light (50% of ambient) for 8 yr. We expected responses to be similar
to those of other arctic tundra communities with increased biomass resulting
from added nutrients and species responding individualistically to generate the
community-level response. However, total vascular biomass did not change in the
dry heath tundra in response to any treatment, although individual species and
functional group biomass differed from controls. Aboveground productivity, estimated
using new apical growth, significantly increased in the N and N+P plots caused
by significantly greater abundance of a tussock-forming grass, Hierochloe
alpina. The lowest species richness was recorded in the N alone plots, where a
deciduous shrub, Betula nana, had its greatest biomass, and richness also declined in
N+P plots. Plots that received P alone had similar biomass and species richness
to controls, although shrubs decreased in abundance. The shade treatment caused
minor biomass differences, marginally less new apical growth, and slightly
lower species richness compared to control plots. These results were similar to
several ongoing studies in Alaskan moist tussock and wet sedge tundras where
aboveground productivity increased in response to added N and/or P but biomass
response lagged. This shift in the dry heath tundra from an evergreen shrub to
a grass dominated system in the N and N+P plots may cause profound ecosystem
function changes as woody biomass capable of long-term carbon storage is lost.
Fates of Added
Nitrogen in Freshwater Arctic Wetlands Grazed by Snow Geese: The Role of Mosses (pp 219-225)
Peter M. Kotanen
Previous studies have shown that the growth of fresh-water grasses and sedges eaten by breeding
colonies of Snow Geese responds weakly to nitrogen additions, and also is
poorly able to compensate within the same season for tissues lost to geese.
These results contrast with the rapid responses to grazing and fertilization
that have been observed in salt-marsh species. A possible explanation is that
the mosses prominent in fresh-water wetlands rapidly sequester added nitrogen,
preventing access by forage species to the fecal inputs provided by foraging
geese. To investigate this hypothesis, I added ecologically realistic amounts
of ammonium and nitrate labelled with 15N to the surface and rooting
zone of experimental plots in freshwater wetland vegetation at two Snow Goose
colonies. Results indicate that the presence of mosses did not prevent forage
species from rapidly taking up ammonium and nitrate added either at or below
the moss surface. Nonetheless, most of the added 15N was absorbed by
the moss layer; consequently, mosses tend to divert nitrogen away from forage
species and into long-lasting peat. In the long term, this may reduce the
ability of freshwater forage plants to recover from damage by increasing
populations of Snow Geese.