NSRL continues in collaborative efforts to exploit intermittently laminated sediments of the tropical North Atlantic Cariaco Basin in order to extend and in-fill calibration of the 14C timescale. Varve-calibrated 14C results provide approximately decadal resolution in the calibration for the deglacial interval 15,000 - 10,000 14C years BP [see Hughen et al. 2000 at http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/hughen2000/hughen2000.html].
Figure 1. Cariaco Basin varve-calibrated
14C results (dark blue)
compared to other calibration data sets spanning the
interval of the last deglaciation [after Hughen et al.
2000]. Cariaco Basin
14C results are for
samples of foraminifera picked by Chanda Herring at NSRL.
All Cariaco Basin 14C
measurements for this study were performed at LLNL-CAMS by
Dr. John Southon and colleagues.

Recently we have extended our analysis of Cariaco Basin sediments to ~50,000 14C year BP in long Ocean Drilling Program cores (Site 165). In this study several hundred 14C determinations were performed at NSRL-NOSAMS and at LLNL-CAMS. Inter-lab agreement, evaluated by comparing Fm (fraction modern) of NSRL-NOSAMS results to interpolated Fm for bracketing LLNL-CAMS measurements was -0.3 ± 0.6 , indicating the absence of any systematic offset between labs. The root-mean-square difference, representing the combined variances for preparation and correction at LLNL-CAMS vs. NSRL, measurement at LLNL-CAMS vs. NOSAMS, and the effects of sampling and interpolation, is 3.9 .
Figure 2. Cariaco Basin
14C age vs. estimated
calendar age [following Peterson et al., 2000],
showing agreement between results from NSRL-NOSAMS (red and
blue) and LLNL-CAMS (green). NSRL-NOSAMS results were
prepared and blank corrected at NSRL and measured at NOSAMS.

These results will be compared to calibration results from Lake Suigetsu, Japan and Barbados (not shown) and to 14C production rates estimated from paleo magnetic time series (Figure 3) in Hughen et al., in preparation
Figure 3: Atmospheric D14C
calculated from Cariaco Basin age pairs in Figures 1 and 2
(and from tree rings), compared to results of a simple
carbon reservoir and exchange model (orange line, upper
panel) forced by 14C
production rates estimated from paleo magnetic data (lower
panel). Timing of events is similar for data and model, but
smaller carbon reservoir sizes are required to match
observations for the glacial period prior to

~15,000 years ago (red line, upper panel).
References cited:
Hughen, K.A., Southon, J.R., Lehman, S.J., and J.T. Overpeck (2000). Synchronous radiocarbon and climate shifts during deglaciation. Science 290: 1951-54.
Hughen, K., Overpeck, J., Lehman, S.J., Kashgarian, M., Southon, J. and L.C. Peterson (1998). A new 14C calibration data set for the last deglaciation. Radiocarbon 40: 483-494.
Hughen, K., Overpeck, J., Lehman, S.J., Kashgarian, M., Peterson, L.C., Alley, R. and D.M. Sigman (1998). Deglacial changes in ocean circulation from an extended 14C calibration. Nature 391: 65-68.
Hughen, K.A., Lehman, S.J., Southon, J.R., Turnbull, J., Marchal, O. and J.T. Overpeck. (in prep.). 14C activity and carbon cycle changes over the past 50,000 years. (to be submitted to Science).