GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE PH.D. COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION IN ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION
PREREQUISITES FOR THE EXAM
FIELDS AND EXAMINERS
GUIDELINES ON THE LENGTH OF READING LISTS
PREPARATION
THE EXAM ITSELF
LOOKING AHEAD: THE DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS


I. INTRODUCTION: WHY COMPS?

The main purpose of the Ph.D. Comprehensive Examination is to prepare you to write a dissertation in your chosen area of specialization while giving you a rigorous grounding in the broader contours of your particular field of literary studies. The length and breadth of the reading lists are intended to give you the most thorough possible immersion in your chosen field over the two semesters of preparation for the examinations. Thus, by the time you have achieved "ABD" ("All But Dissertation") status and begin tackling your dissertation prospectus, you should be able to answer questions such as the following with a high degree of confidence:

Taken together, these sets of questions encourage you to approach comps as a professionalizing experience. In other words, once you have passed the exam, you will in effect be an Early Americanist, an Early Modernist, a Romanticist, or a Victorianist, as well as a true expert in an individual author's oeuvre and critical tradition. You will be deeply familiar with the texts and questions that have shaped your chosen field, and you will have a strong idea of the contribution you want to make to this field through your dissertation.

II. PREREQUISITES FOR THE EXAM

You must complete all your course and language requirements, including incompletes, before your reading lists may be approved by your committee (see below). At this time you will also need to submit an Application for Candidacy form, available from the Student Services Office, indicating your fulfillment of course and language requirements.

III. FIELDS AND EXAMINERS

The Comprehensive Examination consists of three separate and distinct fields each with its own assigned examiner, who will help you formulate the reading list for each field. The Comps committee, which you will choose in consultation with the Director of Graduate Studies, consists of five faculty members: three faculty members appropriate to the three fields of concentration (one of whom will be your advisor); a fourth faculty member who will initiate questions in the second hour of the oral exam; and the Director of Graduate Studies. Except for the Director of Graduate Studies, any of the members may be from outside the English Department.

Before you may schedule the Comprehensive Examination, you must obtain the signatures of the first three members of the committee as well as the Director of Graduate Studies on the Ph.D. Comprehensive Examination Reading List Approval form, available from the Student Services Office. The signatures indicate that each of your three reading lists has been approved by the committee member responsible for this portion of the exam, and by the Graduate Committee. A copy of your lists is filed along with the List Approval form in the Student Services Office. (A bit of advice: nail down the precise content of your lists and get the lists officially approved at least six months in advance of the exam. This will save you from overly caring advisors who try to bulk up your required reading lists at the last minute!)

The fields are defined as follows:

  1. Historical Period: You are responsible for covering major and minor works in a conventionally defined historical period of British, American, or Anglophone literature. The historical period usually covers 100 years or more, and at least 75 years except in unusual circumstances. The historical field should not be keyed too precisely to the topic of your dissertation but should instead engage a comprehensive and representative selection of both canonical and non-canonical writings that reflects the general view of the period obtaining in your field.
  2. Major Author: You are responsible for the author's complete works, biography, and the history of criticism generated by her or his life and works. "Major Author" may also be defined as a cluster of "minor" authors, or of works that delineate an "author function" (e.g., the anonymous author[s] of the English Mystery Plays). In any case, and with the exception of certain contemporary or little-studied writers, the author must have generated a substantial body of criticism that can be read alongside the works, and by the end of the exams the candidate should possess a considerable level of expertise in the author's oeuvre and the history of criticism.
  3. Topic/Theme: The topical or thematic portion of the exam will cover a particular theme or genre, an aspect of literary theory, an interdisciplinary subfield, or an issue in the history of criticism of the candidate's choosing. The theme/topic section is intended in part to allow for the preliminary exploration of texts, issues, theory, and criticism that will figure significantly in the writing of a dissertation prospectus in the months following the exam.

IV. GUIDELINES ON THE LENGTH OF READING LISTS

You are responsible for designing your own reading lists, in consultation with your three field examiners. This is one of the most confusing aspects of the Comprehensive Exam process, so you should be sure that you understand the expected length of your lists before you begin your preparation for the actual exam.

  1. Historical Field: about 40-50 major primary works, or clusters of minor works that add up to a major work. Also approximately 10-15 books (or equivalent in articles) that represent landmark criticism in the field. (Americanists should know F.O. Matthiessen, e.g., while medievalists should know D.W. Robertson.) The Director of Graduate Studies has lists for most periods of American, British, and Anglophone literary studies on file in the Graduate Office as guidelines for putting together your own list. Though we encourage you to modify these lists in any way you or your field examiner sees fit, be aware that the size, representativeness, and comprehension of your own final lists should closely approximate the contents of those approved lists that are on file. A few examples of what counts as a "major" or "minor" work: Shakespeare's King Lear and John Donne's Songs and Sonnets would each count as a major work; Shakespeare's "The Rape of Lucrece" would not, though it could be grouped with "Venus and Adonis" and "A Lover's Complaint" to count as one. Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Rappaccini's Daughter" would not count as a major work, though the collection in which it appeared, Mosses from an Old Manse, would. Again, be sure that you understand what distinguishes a major work and that you clear your selections with your Historical Field examiner.
  2. Major Author: complete works, with reasonable modifications in the case of exceptionally prolific writers, such as Charles Dickens or Thomas More. Also approximately 15-20 books (or equivalent in articles) that represent a survey of major criticism/biography of your author. The criticism should include a historically broad range of the most influential work that has shaped the understanding of your author. In the case of contemporary or recently "recovered" writers whose work has not yet generated a large body of criticism, you should design a list that will allow you to put the primary texts and what criticism does exist in dialogue with other works from the same literary milieu.
  3. Topic/Theme: about 25-30 major works (as defined above in 1. and 2.), either primary, secondary, or theoretical (or some combination thereof).


V. PREPARATION

Most people find it takes them one and a half or two semesters to prepare for comps. Study groups or advice from other students who have recently taken comps often proves very helpful. When you begin your preparation, you should set up a clear agreement with each of your three field examiners regarding how much assistance they will give you. Different professors have different styles of helping students prepare for exams, and you should not expect all your examiners to give you equivalent levels of attention. While it is appropriate to expect an examiner to respond periodically to your questions about the material, either in personal meetings or by phone or e-mail, it is not appropriate to expect an examiner to conduct what amounts to an uncredited independent study on your examination field. It is also not appropriate to ask each of your examiners to give you a practice oral exam or to quiz them about what questions they might ask. The examiner who is acting as your advisor may agree to give you a short practice oral shortly before your exam takes place.

VI. THE EXAM ITSELF

The Comprehensive Examination consists of two parts as follows:

  1. A 48-hour take-home typed answer (not to exceed 15 typed double-spaced pages) to a broad synthesizing question on the student's interests set by the three examiners—field, author, topic. The 48-hour period will be worked out in consultation with the student. The written exam should be submitted to the examining committee no more than three weeks before the oral exam, as it will be used as a basis to initiate discussion during the examination. The student must pass this section before proceeding to the oral exam. If a student fails the written exam, a new written question will be set and the oral will be postponed until the student satisfactorily passes the written exam. Under normal circumstances, the question will be similar to the original. Students may ordinarily retake the exam one time only within three months.
  2. A 2-hour oral examination. (Faculty members should schedule 2-1/2 hours for the oral exam to allow time for discussion.) Questions are asked on all three fields, and questions may refer, but will not be limited, to the pre-submitted written essay. After the first hour of the exam the examiners hold a discussion of no more than 10 minutes, during which the student must not be present. He or she will then be invited to return. The fourth member of the examining committee initiates questions in the second hour. The Director of Graduate Studies is present as a voting member.

All five examiners vote on all three parts of the exam and may pass or fail a student on one, two, or all three parts of the oral exam. A failure of two or more parts results in a failure of the whole oral exam. If a student fails the whole oral exam, she or he may retake it within a period of time determined by the examining committee. A retake of the whole oral exam will follow the same procedures as the original oral exam. A student who fails one part of the oral exam will receive a conditional pass and will normally be required to schedule a retake no sooner than one month and no later than three months after the original oral exam. The retake will normally be oral, though other procedures may be adopted at the discretion of the committee. A re-examination that is oral will be no longer than one hour per section and no longer than two hours overall. A student whose overall performance on the oral exam is weak may also receive a conditional pass and will normally be required to submit further written work.

VII. LOOKING AHEAD: THE DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS

Now that you've passed your Comps and you're officially "ABD," you will start thinking in more specific terms about your dissertation. The first step will be the selection of a dissertation director, whom you will choose in consultation with the Director of Graduate Studies. The second step is the writing of a prospectus in consultation with your dissertation director. Both of these steps are discussed in "Guidelines and Suggestions for the Prospectus, the Prospectus Conversation, and Dissertation Writing for the PhD in English," available in the Graduate Office.

A warning: Many Ph.D. students get bogged down at the point in their studies between Comps and the prospectus conversation, sometimes spending as many as three or four years formulating a prospectus. It doesn't have to be this way. Indeed, if you begin thinking early on in this process about your dissertation—that is, if you let the Comps preparation experience guide you in how to assimilate ideas, pull various texts and arguments together, and gain confidence in your own possible contributions to your field—you should be able to hold your prospectus conversation just two or three months after the Comps.

NOTE: In this description of the Ph.D. Comprehensive Examination procedures, should anything conflict with Graduate School rules, Graduate School rules take precedence.