CLAS / HIST 4091 / 5091:
The
Reading 1: for Friday Sept.
2, 2011
Suetonius Augustus secs. 1-60; 97-101 (p. 43-74;
93-97)
Res
Gestae Divi Augusti (The
Deeds of the Deified Augustus) read entire at http://classics.mit.edu/Augustus/deeds.html
Tacitus Annals 1.1-5, read the first four paragraphs at http://classics.mit.edu/Tacitus/annals.1.i.html
Please
print and bring both the Res Gestae Divi Augusti
and the pages from Tacitus to class.
The Res Gestae Divi Augusti (the Deeds of Augustus) is the one of the most
important sources surviving from Roman times. It is the personal justification
of the first emperor for his long career. It formed one of the documents of
state which Augustus handed over to his heirs on his death, along with his
will, a survey of the empire as he left it, and instructions for the largest
public funeral
Suetonius (writing 120-30s
AD) was a Roman provincial from
Tacitus is perhaps the
greatest Latin historian ever. When he began writing his Annals c. 115 AD, the principate had been
established for well over a century and its problems had become evident.
Tacitus is highly critical of the authoritarian, personal and monarchical form
of rule that Augustus established. Naturally, his viewpoint provides a
counterpoint (and retrospective) on what Augustus offers and a nice foil to his
younger contemporary, Suetonius.
As
we read we should ask, first of the Res Gestae:
1. What did Augustus think
about or try to portray as his place in Roman history?
2. Although various items
recur, the document basically falls into three sections: offices and honors
held; public expenditures; war and diplomacy. What is the main thrust of each
of these?
3. What is the slant of the
document? What does it distort and what does it omit?
4. Who is named in the
document and who is omitted? Why might this be?
5. Note that Augustus uses
the last two sections to describe what he regards as the culmination of his
career. What do these mean?
6. What is said of the three
pillars of power (imperium, tribunicia potestas,
auctoritas)?
7. Why might Augustus have
drafted this document?
Then of all three sources:
8. What differing roles are
assigned to the Senate / ruling classes in the three documents?
9. What does Suetonius expect
from the emperor? How does this differ from what Augustus believed was expected
of himself?
10. What is Tacitus' view of
the principate? What is Suetonius' view? How do these
differ from the picture Augustus presents? Which view do you think is correct
(or is this even a valid question)?