![]() ![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
PWR Course PoliciesThe following are general course policies that apply to all PWR courses. However, because there may be some variation in the way instructors choose to implement them, it is your responsibility to consult your course syllabus and instructor about particular policies for your class.
ENROLLMENT
ADDS/DROPS
ATTENDANCE If you must miss a class, you are responsible for finding out what you missed and for keeping up with the assignments. If you know in advance that you will have to miss a class, it’s a good idea to let your instructor know ahead of time by e-mail or, better yet, by making an appointment with him or her. (E-mailing your instructor after the fact to ask, “What did I miss?” isn’t a good option. Your instructor doesn’t have the time to summarize an entire class period or workshop in an e-mail!) If you need to be absent for a religious observance or for military obligations, you must give your instructor two weeks’ notice. In the case of a military obligation, you will need a note from an officer verifying the reason for your absence. You will also need to arrange in advance for any work that needs to be completed.
FACULTY MAILBOXES
LATENESS
APPEALING A GRADE Step one: You may submit a formal, written appeal to the PWR conflict resolution coordinator. (Please see contact information on page iii at the beginning of this book.) All appeals must be made within 45 days of the academic term in which the course was taken. Step two: If the conflict resolution coordinator deems a review appropriate, he or she will evaluate all relevant course information. It is your responsibility to provide the coordinator with copies of relevant documents (e.g., course policies, syllabus, assignments, clean copies of papers). The coordinator will then have two other PWR instructors independently read and evaluate the paper(s) in question. The conflict resolution coordinator will speak with you and your instructor about the outcome of the review. The instructor will take the review under advisement in deciding whether or not to change the grade. Step three: If you are still not satisfied with the outcome of the appeals process, you may then take the matter to the director of the Program for Writing and Rhetoric, who, after reviewing the case, will make his or her recommendation to the instructor. Final authority for any grade rests with the instructor.
ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE
SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS
PLAGIARISM Plagiarism does not always take such blatant forms, however. Of equal concern, especially in a course like this one where you will be encouraged to draw on others’ ideas in your own writing, are the more subtle forms of plagiarism. For example, you probably know that all words taken directly from a source need to be quoted and cited, and that there are specific conventions for doing this properly. However, you may not know that merely changing a few words in a passage—say, by using the thesaurus function on your word-processing program—does not protect you from the charge of plagiarism. Passages that are similar to their sources in syntax, organization, or wording but are not cited are considered to be plagiarized. In fact, even if you cite the source but do not make it clear to your readers that the phrasing of a passage is not your own, the source is still considered to be plagiarized. Any time you use another’s work—ideas, theories, statistics, graphs, photos, or facts that are not common knowledge—you must acknowledge the author. Depending on the severity of the offense and on the instructor’s particular policy, the consequences for plagiarism vary, from having to rewrite a section of a paper to receiving a failing grade. Therefore, in addition to making sure you understand what constitutes an offense, it is important that you become familiar with your instructor’s policy. In the PWR, we see plagiarism as more than merely a matter of policy or legality. It is also an issue of respect and regard for other readers and writers. Some students are reluctant to cite their sources because they mistakenly believe that in college all their ideas must be original. But the university is a community of thinkers; as such, the writing we produce may be thought of as a conversation with other thinkers. As in any conversation, your “listeners” expect you to build on what has already been said. We all build on each other’s ideas, making our own small contribution to the discussion. At the same time, we all like to see our ideas acknowledged. Acknowledging other people’s work can only enhance your reputation as a credible, thoughtful, honest writer. Although the ideas in your paper may come from others, the way you put them together and make sense of them will be uniquely your own.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | Contact © Board of Regents of the University of Colorado 317 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||