1. What is the nature of late 1990s'
America that Pleasantville opens in? What are the
major problems facing Americans in the late 1990s?
2. How does late 1990s' America contrast with
the 1950s' Pleasantville America? Is Pleasantville really
the ideal America it pretends to be?
3. Why do you think that it is the teenagers
in Pleasantville who first make the change from black and white
to colored? At what physical locations are colored people
first seen?
4. Do you agree with Roger Ebert about one
of the larger themes of Pleasantville:
"The film observes that
sometimes pleasant people are pleasant simply because they have
never, ever been challenged. That it's scary and dangerous to
learn new ways. The movie is like the defeat of the body snatchers:
The people in color are like former pod people now freed to move
on into the future. We observe that nothing creates fascists like
the threat of freedom."
5. Do you agree with Roger Ebert that Pleasantville
is a parable about the present and the past, that the present
isn't as bad as we often think it is and the past wasn't as good
as we often remember it to be:
``Pleasantville'' is the kind of parable that encourages us to
re-evaluate the good old days and take a fresh look at the new
world we so easily dismiss as decadent. Yes, we have more problems.
But also more solutions, more opportunities and more freedom.
I grew up in the '50s. It was a lot more like the world of ``Pleasantville''
than you might imagine. Yes, my house had a picket fence, and
dinner was always on the table at a quarter to six, but things
were wrong that I didn't even know the words for."
6. Why do you think 1990s David is so fascinated
by 1950s Pleasantville? Is he trying to escape from his
troubled life in the late 1990s?
7. What causes David/Bud to decide to
stop trying to prevent Jennifer/Mary Sue from changing the people
of Pleasantville? Why does David/Bud, like Jennifer/Mary
Sue, begin to consciously introduce change into the lives of the
people of Pleasantville?
8. Why do you think Pleasantville focuses so
much attention on Betty Parker's transformation from black and
white to colored? Is this a not-so-subtle comment on the
June Cleavers of 1950s' TV families?
9. Do you agree with Salon Magazine's
Charles Taylor that Pleasantville is a parable about democracy
and freedom:
"He's clearly working off the
now familiar equation of the present with the conformist '50s.
Ross wants to tell us that the rigid controls that religious and
political authority figures try to put on us run contrary to both
our natures and the meanings of democracy. He wants us to accept
that change and uncertainty and even inchoate upheaval are a necessary
part of democracy."
10. What is the significance of Pleasantville
teenagers' emerging desire to read books and understand the larger
world outside of Pleasantville? Why do the town fathers
later burn these library books?
11. How is Jennifer/Mary Sue transformed
in Pleasantville? What is the significance of her reading
D.H. Lawrence's Lady Chatterly's Lover?
12. Do you agree with Salon Magazine's
Charles Taylor about the contradictory message presented by Jennifer/Mary
Sue deciding to stay in Pleasantville:
"And why does a movie that makes
such a stink about authority figures who sit in judgment of other
people's behavior wind up having Witherspoon announce that she
needs to stop being a slut (the character's words) and hunker
down and study -- particularly when her unbridled sexuality is
what begins the loosening up in the first place? The message that
teens who explore their sexuality are headed for trouble is exactly
the same drivel issuing from the cultural ayatollahs Ross is excoriating."
13. Do you agree with James Berardinelli
that "Pleasantville is about the falseness of family
values and the need of the individual to break through society's
shield of conformity, but, most of all, it's about having fun
at the expense of nostalgia."
14. Why are Pleasantville's black and
white people so threatened by colored people and colors?
Why do they try to outlaw colors?
15. What does the Director Gary Ross imply
with his description of David/Bud's character about 1990s' young
people:
"For Tobey [David/Bud], it's from disengagement to engagement.
He's distanced, he's removed... he's voyeuristic. He looks at
life from a kind of distance, which is so much of what cynical
kids do today, that... the cynicism is a defense against hope.
And so they stay safe by judging, by putting up a cynical veneer.
By not showing that kind of vulnerability or that kind of exposure.
And the moment that Tobey [David/Bud] turns color in the movie
is the moment that he engages, emotionally."