In 1997, the federal
government announced that over 5 million illegal aliens are estimated
to be living in the United States. Since 1970, over 23 million
legal immigrants have been welcomed to the United States. More
than 8.3 million people immigrated to the United States in the
1980s, which is the highest number of immigrants in any decade
in American history. If these rates of immigration continue in
the 1990s, over 10 million immigrants will be welcomed into the
United States in the 1990s. In fact, Congress in the 1990 Immigration
Act increased the number of people allowed to immigrate per year
from 35 to 40 percent.
How has immigration affected the
economy, society, and culture of the American West? The settlement,
development, and continued economic health of the West all depended
on the rush of immigrant into the West from the 1820s to this
day. However, despite the dependence on immigration for the economic
growth and development of the West, Americans in the West have
historically have been troubled by the massive influx of peoples
into the West. The irony is that on the one hand their economy
and society depends on continued immigration, but Westerners resent
the coming of immigrants and have tried over the years to block
and limit their settling in the West. How can we explain this
Western ambivalence about immigration?
Let's look at the current debate
over immigration in the United States and in the West to see what
the issues are. In 1997, the federal government announced that
over 5 million illegal aliens are estimated to be living in the
United States. Since 1970, over 23 million legal immigrants have
been welcomed to the United States. More than 8.3 million people
immigrated to the United States in the 1980s, which is the highest
number of immigrants in any decade in American history. If these
rates of immigration continue in the 1990s, over 10 million immigrants
will be welcomed into the United States in the 1990s. In fact,
Congress in the 1990 Immigration Act increased the number of people
allowed to immigrate per year from 35 to 40 percent. Despite increasing
competition for jobs, the United States continues to increase
the number of immigrants it allows legally into the United States.
And we really don't know what are the numbers of new illegal immigrants
enter the United States each year. Why is the United States welcoming
so many new immigrant in the last few decades?
Since the 1970s, Americans have
been increasingly concerned about the growing numbers of illegal
immigrants, especially from Mexico and Latin America. In the 1980s
and 1990s, the majority of Americans want to limit legal and illegal
immigration. But America continues to open its doors to more and
more immigrants. With 4.7 percent of the world's population, we
are taking in more than 50 percent of the world's immigrants.
Why are we doing this if the majority of Americans want to reduce
this immigration?
In the "Frontline" documentary,
"Go Back to Mexico, many Americans in the West, especially
in California, describe their concerns about increasing numbers
of immigrants coming to the United States. Their concerns range
from taking American jobs, using scarce government services like
welfare and education moneys, increasing overcrowding and demands
for public services in California's growing cities, and the immigrants'
failure to assimilate into American culture. But why are these
immigrants coming? They are coming as economic refugees. Their
countries of origin in the Third World cannot supply the high-paying
jobs, the standard of living, the opportunities, and the future
that living in America can. America still beckons as a land of
opportunity for these immigrants.
So we have a fundamental conflict
between the U.S. government's policy of welcoming increasing numbers
of immigrants, immigrants' desires to come to and contribute to
the American economy, and Americans' fear that immigrants are
taking their jobs and threatening their standard of living. How
have Americans resolved these conflicts in the past. I believe
that a brief history of the debate over immigration to the West
from the 1820s to the present will shed some light on the current
immigration debate and Westerner's historical ambivalence about
immigration.
From a larger historical perspective,
the first illegal aliens, or immigrant problem, the West faced
was the coming of the Spanish to the Americas in the 1500s. By
1600, the Spanish had conquered Mexico and laid claim to what
is today the American Southwest, from California to Texas. From
the Indians' who had settled in this region, the Spanish conquerors
were the first illegal aliens, who threatened to undermine the
culture and way of life. Many Indian peoples refused to accept
Spanish control over the West.
In 1821, after hundreds of years
of Spanish domination, Mexico won its Independence from Spain.
Mexico was made up of a mestizo people, the descendants of both
the native Indian peoples and the Spanish settlers. After winning
its independence, Mexico was faced with a real dilemma in the
1820s, many Americans insisted that it was their God-given manifest
destiny to conquer the continent and to push aside inferior peoples
and cultures. Fearing this threat from the expansionist United
States, the Mexican government in the 1820s decided to encourage
white American settlers to settle in what is now the American
Southwest. The Mexican government offered white settlers free
land and freedom from taxes for five years in return for the settlers
becoming citizens of Mexico, becoming Catholic, and adopting Mexican
culture and society as their own. The Mexican government believed
that if the Southwest was settled and developed that the United
States could not conquer it from Mexico. This, however, was a
grave mistake.
By the 1830s, Mexico realized
that encouraging white settlers to settler in the Mexican Southwest
was a mistake. White settlers were not recognizing Mexican law,
not respecting the rights of Mexicans and Indians, and were refusing
to become part of Mexican society and culture. Thus, Mexico faced
an immigrant problem in the Southwest. Mexico acted to limit further
white immigration and more tightly regulate the white immigrants
who had settled in the Southwest. These efforts quickly led to
conflict. In 1835 and 1836, settler communities in Texas declared
their independence from Mexico and fought a war with the Mexican
government. In 1836, the white settlers in Texas, with secret
help from the United States government, had won their independence
from Mexico. But the Mexican government never really accepted
Texas Independence.
In 1846, the United States annexed
Texas into the Union and started a war with Mexico in order to
win the rest of the Mexican Southwest for American development.
By 1848, the United States had conquered the Southwest from Mexico.
In fact, the Mexicans' greatest fear had come true: The United
States had stolen half of Mexican territory as a result of its
war with Mexico. After winning the Southwest from Mexico, American
settler began flooding into California and Oregon. It was now
the American Southwest, and Americans would now face their own
immigrant problems in the region.
The first major immigrant problem
America faced in the West was from Chinese immigrants. From the
late 1840s to the early 1880s, thousands of Chinese immigrants
were recruited and encouraged to come to the American West to
work in the mines, farms, and businesses. Fleeing famine and political
unrest in China, many Chinese welcomed the opportunity to come
to America. However, by the 1850s, many white American settlers
in California increasingly saw these Chinese immigrants as a threat.
Facing moves to restrict further Chinese immigration, Norman Assing,
one of the leaders of the Chinese immigrant community in California,
wrote a letter to the governor of California arguing that Californians
shouldn't worry about Chinese immigrants. Assing argued that the
Chinese were civilized, part of the white race, and helping to
build the economy and society of the American Southwest.
By the 1870s, as a result of the
increasing presence of Chinese immigrant communities in the Southwest,
White Americans formed mobs and tried to burn-down the Chinese
homes and drive them out of their cities at gunpoint. This racial
violence was widespread, occurring from Seattle to Los Angeles
in the 1870s. These white mobs feared the Chinese because they
felt they were taking American jobs, threatening white businesses,
and not assimilating into American society. Clearly, the American
Southwest now had an immigrant problem. In 1882, the United States
government passed the Chinese Exclusion Act which shut the door
to further Chinese immigration to the United States. This was
the first time the American government had limited immigration
on the basis of race.
However, American businesses,
farmers, railroad and mining companies had depended on cheap Chinese
immigrant labor for the profits and much of their workforce. Unwilling
to pay higher wages to American workers, Southwest economic interests
increasingly looked to Japanese immigrants to replace the Chinese
workers they could no longer attract from China. From 1882 to
the early 1900s, economic and business elites recruited and encouraged
Japanese immigrants to come to the West. Afterall, the law said
that Chinese immigrants were no longer welcome, but it didn't
say anything about Japanese immigrants.
By the early 1900s, many white
American workers, farmers, and small businessmen began to fear
Japanese immigrants. They argued that the Japanese were taking
their jobs, threatening their standard of living, and not assimilating
into American culture. Facing increasing pressure from concerned
Americans, the United States government created an informal treaty
with Japan greatly restricting Japanese immigration to the United
States.
However, Western economic interests
were still not willing to hire White Americans and pay them higher
wages and benefits. Instead, these economic interests looked for
another group of immigrants to take the place of the Chinese and
Japanese immigrant workers they once depended on. From the early
1900s to 1924, Western economic interests recruited and encouraged
Indians and Philippinos to immigrate to the American West. Of
course, as you might imagine, by the late 1910s, the growing number
of Indian, Phillipino, and Eastern Europeans immigrants in the
West caused white Americans to again worry about an immigrant
problem. In 1924, the Federal government passed the Immigration
Act which shut the door to further immigration from Asia and Europe
to the United States. But this didn't solve the immigrant problem
for Western White Americans.
The 1924 Immigration Act did not
include Mexicans and immigrants from Latin America. Western economic
interests made sure they still had a source of cheap labor to
work in the farms, mines, and businesses. By early 1930s, thousands
and thousands of Mexicans had immigrated the American West. But
with the Great Depression of the 1930s, many White Americans came
to see these Mexican immigrants as a problem. In the early 1930s,
blaming these Mexican workers for the economic Depression in the
West, hundreds of thousands of Mexicans, both legal and illegal
immigrants, were rounded up and forcibly returned to Mexico. White
Americans now believed that with the Mexican immigrant problem
taken care of there would be plenty of jobs for them.
However, after their Mexican workers
were rounded up and deported, Western economic interests still
did not want to hire more expense, local White workers. Instead,
they recruited poor, Southern farmers and their families to migrate
the American West in the 1930s. As a result hundreds of thousands
of poor, White Southerners migrated to the West and took the jobs
once held by Mexican immigrants. This worked for a while, but
by the late 1930s, Western economic interests were facing a real
dilemma: They couldn't find enough cheap White, Southern workers
to work for them. Thousands of these workers had moved into the
growing Western military industries and many more refused to work
for such low wages and in such horrible conditions. So what did
the Western economic interests do now?
In the late 1930s and early 1940s,
Western economic interests convinced the Federal government that
it should actively support Mexican immigrants to come and work
in the West. They argued that there was now a shortage of cheap
labor to work in the fields, mines, and factories of the West.
From the late 1930s to 1964, working closely with Western economic
interests, the United States government encouraged millions of
Mexican workers to both work and settle in the American West.
But, by the early 1960s, many White Americans again began to worry
about the growth of Mexican immigrant communities in the West
and competition for jobs with Mexican workers. They demanded that
the Federal government end its support for the bracero program
in 1964. However, in 1965, the United States government passed
a new Immigration Act which once again large numbers of immigrants
to come from Europe and Asia.
As a result of increasing federal
government support for immigration since the 1970s, we have seen
the numbers of legal and illegal immigrants rapidly increasing.
However, the majority of American still feel, as they always have,
that massive immigration threatens their jobs, standards of living,
and American culture and society. Anti-immigrant sentiment in
the West has been rising since the 1980s. So why has the government
welcomed even larger numbers of immigrants in the 1990s than in
the 1980s? This is the real question that needs to be addressed
if Americans are going to have and open and honest public debate
about its immigration problem.
Since the 1970s, in order to keep
American companies in the United States, the Federal government,
under pressure from large global corporations such as IBM, Microsoft,
Ford, and GE, has open its doors to record numbers of immigrants.
Just as Western economic interests depended on and still depend
on new waves of immigrant workers to keep wages down and their
profits up, America's largest corporations are demanding an every
larger supply of workers. By rapidly increasing the number of
workers seeking work, and actively creating competition between
American and immigrant workers, American companies can keep wages
low and demand that their workers accept a reduced standard of
living. Recognizing this threat to their standard of living, American
workers then demand that the government close its doors to future
immigration. But their demands are going unheard. American companies,
many with global operations, just threaten to move their operations
out of the country if the government doesn't make sure that wages
are low and their profits are high. The best example of this pressure
can be seen by looking at the debate over increasing numbers of
"guest workers" be allowed into the United States. Microsoft
recently threatened to take some of its operation to India if
the government didn't allow Indian computer programmers and engineers
to work in the United States as temporary "guest workers."
The larger conclusion is that
America does not have an immigrant problem. It has a jobs and
wages problem. As long as American economic interests are unwilling
to pay the wages demanded by American workers to maintain their
relatively high standards of living, high compared to other, poorer,
less-developed countries, then they will be forced to seek and
recruit immigrant workers to the United States. The history of
immigration to the American West best illustrates this process.
Visitors to the West comment on the large Asian, Mexican, and
Latin American communities in its major cities. The West is a
meeting point of people from around the world because American
economic interests have encouraged immigration and continue to
do so. Until the government refuses to be blackmailed by America
corporations and limits further immigration to the West and to
America, Americans will debate about the causes and cures of the
immigration problem. The larger unanswered question is this: Can
the United States maintain its high standards of living in a global
economy that is creating a downward spiral of living standards,
as global corporations force workers to accept falling wages or
lose their jobs to other countries. In the end, if American economic
interests can't import workers to keep wages low, they will export
their factories and companies.