12.
Questions to ask about History Books


Questions
on the Loewen Reading:
1. What does Loewen
mean when he argues that "history is furious debate informed
by evidence and reason"? (16)
2. Why do history
textbooks "exclude conflict or real suspense...[and] leave out
anything that might reflect badly upon our national character"?
(13)
3. Why don't teachers
teach against the history textbook if they know it is wrong? (290)
4. What does Loewen
mean when he writes: " Our society lies to itself about its past.
Questioning these lies can seem anti-American. Textbooks may
only reflect these lies because we want them to." (292)
5. Should parents,
teachers, and the community have the right to pressure teachers
to "present history as they want it presented"? (292)
6. Do you agree
with Loewen when he concludes: "Perhaps adults' biggest reason
for lying is that they fear our history-- fear that it isn't so wonderful,
and that if children were to learn what has really gone on,
they would lose all respect for our society" ? (296)
7. What does Loewen
mean when he argues that "surely in a democracy a historian's
duty is to tell the truth"? (296)
8. Do
you agree with Loewen conclusion that we shouldn't ask children
to learn history if it isn't the truth? (297)
9. Do
you agree with Loewen that "schools must help us ask questions
about our society and its history and how to figure out answers for
ourselves." (313)
10. What does Loewen
mean when he argues that "history is central to our ongoing understanding
of ourselves and our society"? (318)
Major
Questions Americans ask about their Government and Society:
-
What should
be the role of government in society?
-
Should the government
promote economic growth and opportunity?
-
Should the government
provide aid and support to those who can't support themselves?
-
Should the government
promote morality and values?
-
Should the government
promote democracy, our democratic institutions, and citizen participation
in government and society?
-
Should the government
protect the environment and people's health?
-
Should the government
work to preserve and protect the global environment?
-
What should
be the role of government in
protecting Americans from crime and punishing criminals?
-
Should the government
protect the rights of
minorities and provide opportunities for minorities to succeed
in American society?
-
Should the government
protect and promote the equal rights of women in American society?
-
What should
be the role of government in protecting and promoting the
rights of children
and future generations of Americans?
-
Should the government
provide economic and medical support to the elderly?
-
Should the government
try to expand American economic, political, and military
power and influence throughout the world?
-
Should the government
provide economic and political support to American and global
corporations?
-
What should
be the role of the government in solving social problems
and mediating cultural
and political conflicts in America?


In a
democratic society the government is the people. In a democracy,
the people have the right and responsibility to shape and control
their lives, their government, and their society. The larger object
of government is to protect the life, liberty, and happiness of Americans.
"Citizens
who are their own historians, willing to identify lies and distortions
and able to use sources to determine what really went on in the
past, become a formidable force for democracy." (318)
James Loewen
Loewen's larger
conclusions about High School History:
"America
history is longer, larger, more various, more
beautiful, and more terrible than anything anyone has ever said about
it"
--------------------------James Baldwin
"Once
you have learned how to ask questions--relevant and appropriate and
substantial questions--you have learned how to learn and
no one can keep you from learning whatever
you want or need to know."
Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner (312)
"The
answers one gets depends partly upon the questions one asks, and the
questions one asks depends partly upon one's purpose and one's place
in the social structure. Perhaps not everyone in the classroom will
come to the
same conclusion." (315)
James Loewen
"The
deeply frustrating lesson of history in the
American West and elsewhere is this: human
beings can be a mess--contentious, conflict
loving, petty, vindictive, and cruel--and human
beings can manifest grace, dignity, compassion,
and understanding"
Patricia Limerick, Something in the Soil (p. 21)
Five
Questions to ask about History Books:
1. Why was
it written? Who is the audience the book is written for?
2. Whose
viewpoint or perspective is the book written from? What political,
cultural, or social biases does the book reflect?
3. Is the
historical account believable? Is it credible? Do people really
act this way?
4. Does
this historical account contradict other
histories you have read?
5. How is
one suppose to feel about the America that is presented in this
historical account? Is it a
critical account, examining multiple perspectives
on issues and events?
"History
is central to our own understanding of ourselves and our society."
James Loewen
"Failure
to understand history weakens Americans' ability to shape and control
their lives, their government, and their society. Without an understanding
of the past, we cannot be active, responsible citizens. Democracy
requires that Americans understand and use their knowledge of the
past to shape the present and future.."
............Chris Lewis

Review
by David Dannenberg:*
Lies My Reviewer Told Me Clark Stooksbury's
review of James Loewen's Lies My Teacher Told Me ("Reconstructing
History," September 1995) was good, but missed a salient point.
One of the most insidious and destructive aspects of the state control
of schools is the control of the curricula, which necessarily become
politicized. Nowhere is this effect more pernicious than in the teaching
of history, which becomes by this process bland, reflective of current
political trends, statistics, and, worst of all, factually incorrect.
Loewen's point is not simply that we
are boring our students with watered-down feel-good history, but that
we are giving them an extremely inaccurate picture of the United States
of America, a picture where they see no role for themselves as individuals.
In the history presented in high school textbooks, "important"
personages are virtually deified; events occur without cause, debate,
or dissent; and the good guys win because it is preordained. History
as taught in this country is devoid of the ideas and intellectual
conflict that shape events; the protagonists are lacking the foibles,
motivations, and contradictions that show them as human; the bad guys
never win. Students thereby are given little or no opportunity to
empathize with our predecessors in such a way as to draw inferences
that relate historic events to current events, and can envision no
role for themselves in using ideas and convictions to shape future
events.
Without some broad understanding of how we got
where we are, students will have little idea how to get us where we
want to go. In all, the current teaching of catechisms of American
history amounts to an ideal formula for making students into the passive,
ineffectual, nihilistic, apathetic sheep that much of our populace
has become.
I am surprised that Stooksbury made
no specific mention of chapter eight, provocatively entitled
"Watching Big Brother: What Textbooks Teach About the Federal
Government." The concluding paragraph of this chapter states
in part, "[Textbook authors narcotize students from thinking
about such issues as the increasing dominance of the executive branch.
By taking the government's side, textbooks encourage students to conclude
that criticism is incompatible with citizenship. . . . All this
encourages students to throw up their hands in the belief that the
government determines everything anyway, so why bother, especially
if its actions are usually so benign" (emphasis mine).
David Dannenberg
Philadelphia, Pa.
*An e-mail
to H-Teach listserv, Spring 1997