REFERENCES

Cashin, W. E. (1995). "Student Ratings of Teaching: The Research Revisted" IDEA Paper No. 32. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.


RECOMMENDED READING

Ambrami, P. C. & d’Apollonia, S. (1990). "The dimensionality of ratings and their use in personnel decisions." In M. Theall, & J. Franklin, Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice. New directions for teaching and learning, No. 43, (pp. 97-111). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Austin, A. E., & Gamson, Z. F. (1983). "Academic workplace: New demands, heightened tensions." ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report, No. 10. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Braskamp, L.A. & Ory, J. C. (1994). Rating Scales and Checklists. Assessing faculty work: enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cashin, W. E. (1988). "Student ratings of teaching: A summary of the research" IDEA Paper No. 20. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

Cashin, W. E. (1989). "Defining and evaluating college teaching." IDEA Paper No. 21. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 339 731).

Cashin, W. E. (1990b). "Students do rate different academic fields differently." M. Theall, & J. Franklin, (Eds.). "Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice." New directions for teaching and learning, No. 43, 113-121. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cashin, W. E., & Downey, R. G. (1992). "Using global student ratings for summative evaluation." Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 563-572.

Cashin, W. E., Downey, R. G. & Sixbury. G. R. (1994). "Global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives: Reply to Marsh (1994)." Journal of Educational Psychology, 86: 649-657.

Cashin, W. E. (1996). "Developing an effective faculty evaluation system." IDEA Paper No. 33. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13, 321-341.

Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multi-section validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-309.

Diamond, R. M. (1994). Serving on promotion and tenure committees. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Diamond, R. M. (1995). Preparing for promotion and tenure review. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Diamond, R. M., & Adam, B. E. (Eds.). (1993). Recognizing faculty work: Reward systems for the year 2000: New directions for higher education, No. 81. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Feldman, K. A. (1977). Consistency and variability among college students in rating their teachers and courses: A review and analysis. Research in Higher Education, 6, 233-274.

Feldman, K. A. (1983). Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students. Research in Higher Education, 18, 3-124.

Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227-298.

Feldman, K. E. (1988). Effective college teaching from the students’ and faculty’s view: Matched or mismatched priorities. Research in Higher Education, 28, 291-344.

Feldman, K. E. (1989a). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators and external (neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education, 30, 137-194.

Feldman, K. A. (1989b). The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multi-section validity studies. Research in Higher Education,30, 583-645.

Feldman, K. A. (1992). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part I—Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments. Research in Higher Education, 33, 317-375.

Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II—Evidence from students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education, 34, 151-211.

Floyd, C. E. (1985). Faculty participation in decision making: Necessity or luxury? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 8. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

French-Lazovik, G. (1981). Peer review: Documentary evidence in the evaluation of teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 73-89). Beverly Hills, Sage.

French-Lazovik, G. (Ed.). (1982). Practices that improve teaching evaluation: New directions for teaching and learning, No. 11. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Goodwin, H. I., & Smith, E. R. (1985). Faculty and administrator evaluation: Constructing the instruments (Revised ed.). Morgantown: West Virginia University, Department of Education Administration.

Hendrickson, R. M., & Lee, B. A. (1983). Academic employment and retrenchment: Judicial review and administrative action. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report, No. 8. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Howard, G. S., & Maxwell, S. E. (1980). The correlation between student satisfaction and grades: A case of mistaken causation? Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 810-820.

Licata, C. M. (1986). Post-tenure faculty evaluation: Threat or opportunity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 1. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Marincovich, M. (1999). Using student feedback to improve teaching. In P. Seldin et al.(Eds.) Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching: A Practical Guide to Improved Faculty Performance and Promotion/Tenure Decisions, (pp. 45-69). Bolton, MA: Anker.

Marsh, H. W., (1991a). Multidimensional students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 285-296.

Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1991). Students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: The stability of mean ratings of the same teachers over a 13-year period. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 300-314.

Marsh, H. W. & M. Kunkin. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 143-233). New York: Agathon.

Marsh, H. W., and J. E. Ware. (1982). Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multi-dimensional student rating scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 126-134.

Miller, R. I. (1987). Evaluating faculty for promotion and tenure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Naftulin, D. H., Ware, J. W., & Donnelly. F. A. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48 630-635.

Olswang, S. G., & Lee, B. A. (1984). Faculty freedoms and institutional accountability: Interactions and conflicts. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Reports, No. 5. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Seldin, P. (1984). Changing practices in faculty evaluation: A critical assessment and recommendations for improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sixbury, G. R., & Cashin, W. E. (1995a). Description of Database for the IDEA Diagnostic Form. IDEA Technical Report No. 9. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.

Smith, A. (Ed.). (1983). Evaluating faculty and staff: New directions for community colleges, No. 41. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ting, K. (2000). Cross-level effects of class characteristics on students’ perceptions of teaching quality. Journal of Educational Psychology. 92(4), 818-825.

Yuker, H. E. (1984). Faculty workload: Research, theory, and interpretation. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Research Report, No. 10. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

top