Update from the 'CU101' Task Force – April
12, 2007
(1) Active Members of the Task
Force:
(2) Four sections of The Contemporary Research University and Student-Citizens were offered to students in either Baker or Farrand Residential Academic Programs {RAP} this past fall as a 2-credit hour A&S elective. The course was part of the Phase I pilot effort aimed at accelerating the cognitive and affective development of new students to enhance their ability to succeed as contributing and learning citizens of UC-Boulder, as well as devising a way to improve our students' abilities to find their niche on this large, complex campus. The two primary goals for the course were (1) to advance entering first-year students’ knowledge of the university community as a site for intellectual and ethical development and (2) to develop a multifaceted understanding of human differences as experienced in and around the university context. The four classes were taught by Vanessa Baird, Associate Professor, Political Science; Meloni Rudolph, Instructor, Farrand RAP; Valerio Fermi, Associate Professor, French and Italian; Carol Kearns, Senior Instructor, Baker RAP.
(3)
An extensive effort is being made to extract as much information as possible
from this very small initial effort (31 students) with the aim of providing
guidance with respect to improvements via modification and change. The four instructors provided detailed personal
perspectives, and the curriculum/instructor coordinator (
(4) The Task Force is presently working up a comprehensive report on the Phase I pilot which we anticipate being available for each Task Force member’s critique and comment before the end of April 2007. The Task Force is awaiting the formal report from the external research firm.
(5) Following submission of the comprehensive Phase I report to the Provost and the campus as a whole, a decision will need to be made about whether or not a Phase II pilot should be implemented for the next academic year. The Task Force has been working diligently to prepare for Phase II in advance due to the large lead times of certain tasks, so that the groundwork is prepared, if indeed, there is a decision to go forward with Phase II.